Atmospheric Geoengineering

Atmospheric Geoengineering

Julian Rose, August 2010

I have drawn extensively upon a Global Research article  by Radi Ananda of July 30th 2010, entitled “Atmospheric Geoengineering, Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails” in putting together this article.

Many of us have had our suspicions concerning the advent of unusual cloud formations and abnormal jet trails forming in the upper atmosphere over the past decade. I have personally witnessed hundreds of days of ‘engineered’ jet trails and clouds, both in the UK and in Poland.  However, it has proved extremely difficult to obtain any information about this phenomena from official sources. When challenged, the normal answer is “nothing unusual is happening.”

This however, turns out to be very far from the truth, as we shall see from the evidence revealed in this paper. While I concentrate the majority of the article on just one recent example of professional research on this topic, there have, in practice, been hundreds of both official and unofficial documents exploring and exposing the military and civil aviation antics that are responsible for laying layer upon layer of toxic aerosol “chemtrails” in the sky above our heads on an almost daily basis for the last ten years.

These ‘events’ go unreported by mainstream media and governments remain silent. This collusion, prevents us, the general public, ever finding out that we are being subjected to a grand geoengineering experiment which has the effect of hobbling our health and severely disrupting the natural environment. Only by extensive use of the internet is it possible to unearth the facts and gain reasonable access to information about this vast and largely covert quasi-military operation in our sky’s.

We have the Belgium based Belfort Group to thank for bringing together more than seven years of research and fact finding on the activities that have become largely known as “Chemtrails.” At an international symposium at Delft University of Technology in Ghent, 29 May 2010, the Belfort Group enlisted Dr Coen Vermeeren, a senior aeronautics engineer, to address this issue. Dr Vermeeren took as the basis of his presentation, a 300 page scientific report entitled “Case Orange: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies.” (1) In his talk Dr Vemeeren frankly admits to the existence of ‘persistent contrails’:

“We also know that chemtrails do exist because we do the spraying; for crops, for example, and we know that they have been spraying for military purposes. So ‘chemtrails’ is not new. We know about it.”

The Case Orange report reveals the existence of publicly available material that shows that various forms of geoengineering have been going on for “at least 60 years.” Early examples include ‘cloud seeding’ UK war operations in Germany in World War Two and in Vietnam during US attempts to dislodge the North Vietnamese during the Vietnam war. However, these pale into insignificance by comparison with the extensive nature of current activities.

Controversy over the detrimental effects of such activities on both the environment and man, led to ‘Environmental Modification’ (En Mod) weaponry being banned under the auspices of “The UN Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques” in 1987. It is not clear whether this ban was ever fully enforced. However, interest in En Mod soon gained prominence when ‘global warming’ warnings and accompanying environmental stress issues attracted global scientific interest.(2)

The Case Orange report cites a number of US patents for the invention of a “Specific contrail generation apparatus for producing a powder contrail having maximum radiation scattering ability for a given weight of material. The seeding material consists of 85% metallic particles and 15% Colloidial Silica and Silica gel in order to produce a stable contrail that has a residence period of 1 up to 2 weeks.”

Then, in 2009, the publication of a report entitled “Modification of Cirrus Clouds to Reduce Global Warming” put the case for further geoengineering strategies (3). These all had the stated intent of creating a layer of reflective cloud capable of bouncing back the sun’s rays to prevent unwanted terrestrial climate heating.

The report finds that The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change findings to be exactly the same as the Hughes Aircraft Patent 1991. Hughes was later bought by Raytheon, The US government’s private defence contractor. This is the same company that aquired the contract to build HAARP ‘The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program” in Gakona, Alaska.

HAARP is a large 180 antennae grid that projects powerful electro magnetic pulses to heat a specific point in the earth’s ionosphere. This has the effect of creating electromagnetic frequencies that can be bounced back to earth at desired locations, causing major disruption to weather and geophysical elements, even deep underground. Up to 3.6 billion watts can be generated by HAARP, heating the ionosphere to over 50,000 degrees and “lifting a 30 square kilometre area of the ionosphere, thereby changing localised pressure systems or even altering the route of jet streams.” (4)(5)

The Case Orange report cites evidence that Raytheon could develop the capacity to “Exercise a form of complete ‘weather control.’” A situation bearing a marked similarity to the Monsanto corporation’s stated ambition “to control the food chain.” It is noteworthy that there are currently more than 500 ‘climate ready’ genetically modified plant gene patents awaiting licensing approvals in Washington and Brussels. ‘Climate Ready’ GM seeds and plants are promised by their creators to be capable of producing a crop under both flood and drought conditions.

The human rights and environmental watchdog ‘ETC Group’ gives the following prognosis on atmospheric geoengineering developments: “The roll-out of ‘Plan B’ (a reference to the use of geoengineering if other efforts to curtail emissions should be deemed ineffective) is being skilfully executed:

Prominent high level panels sponsored by prestige groups, a spate of peer-reviewed articles in science journals and a line up of panicked politicians in northern countries, nodding nervously in agreement as scientists testify about the “need to research Plan B.”

Rady Ananda states (in the Global Research article cited at the end of this paper (6):

“Case Orange ties-in a 1996 report by top military personnel in the US entitled “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” (7) with details such as – government spraying schedules, chemical orders, correct nomenclature used in airline operation manuals and calls for goeengineering by economists – to support its notion of “heavy involvement of governments at top level in climate control projects.” Ananda continues: “Owning the Weather in 2025 provides a specific time line for the use of En Mod technologies in cooperation with the Weather Modification Association, a business-government group promoting the ‘beneficial’ (my italics) uses of environmental modification (8):

2000-2025 Use chemicals for atmospheric seeding by civilian (as well as military) aviation

2004 Create smart clouds through nanotechnology, with exponential increase from 2010

2005  Introduce carbon black dust

In 2007, The World Meteorological Organisation (of the United Nations) published a statement that included “Guidelines for Planning of Weather Modification Activities.” This document clearly

implicates the UN in plans to conduct aerosol spraying activities on a wide scale.

In a section of the Case Orange report dealing with ‘the bare necessities of geoengineering through cloud generation for the survival of the planet’ the authors state:

“Our investigation team comes to the conclusion that climate control programs, controlled by the military but approved by governments, are silently implemented in order to avoid the worst case scenario they obviously do not want. The two basic instruments are temperature control through the generation of artificial clouds and manipulation of the ionosphere through ionosphere heaters.

Both remain basically military combat systems with the option to go into the offensive if deemed necessary. However, since several ionospheric heaters are installed at various places around the globe, one can assume that there is wide cooperation between governments in order to reach climate targets by 2025: controlling the weather and the planet.” (my emphasis).

The spraying schemes seem to be organised in a logical pattern so that the whole of Europe is covered in a 3 day period. Coloured maps of Europe indicate when each regime is to take place.

In the report’s section entitled ‘Recommendations’ the authors state:

“Persistent chemtrails have a devastating impact on eco-systems on this planet and to quality of life in general.” The authors call for the full disclosure of the current En Mod activities to the public, as well as for all civil aviation laws to be abided by.

One encouraging piece of information is that, in response to policy interest in geoengineering as a means to climate control, the sub committee of the United Nations Convention of Biodiversity, proposed, in May 2010, a moratorium of geoengineering activities (9). This proposal will be heard at the Tenth Conference of Parties to the UN Convention of Biodiversity in Nagoya, Japan in October this year (2010).

The Case Orange report further states that the US permits open air testing of chemical and biological weapons – but not under the civil law mentioned earlier in this article. The authors paraphrase the permissive law thus: “The Secretary of Defense may conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological agents on civilian populations.” It seems that ‘national security’ concerns can be used by the President to overrule environmental and public health considerations. Is the same true of Europe?

I have tried to provide a basic outline of the main evidence arising from the Case Orange report. It makes an important contribution to opening up otherwise secretive agendas that have no place in any self declared democracy. Other significant reports that can be found via a web search, include an important paper by Dr Ilya Perlingieri, entitled “The Consequences of Toxic Metals and Chemical Aerosols on Human health” (Global Research). Dr Perlingieri states:

“Over the past decade, independent testing of Chemtrails around the county have shown a dangerous, extremely poisonous brew that includes: barium, nano-aluminium coated fibreglass (known as CHAFF), radioactive thorium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, dessicated blood, mould spores, yellow fungal mycotoxins, ethylene dibromide and polymer fibres. Barium can be compared to the toxicity of arsenic (10) and is known to adversely effect the heart. Aluminium has a history of damaging brain function.”  I need hardly add that ethylene dibromide is a highly toxic agricultural pesticide.

In another report, Dr Hildegarde Staninger reports that “Exposure to aerial emissions of nano composite materials resulted in cholinesterase inhibition. (11). The chronic inhibition of this enzyme (that normally circulates in red blood corpuscles) caused by the spraying of these Chemtrail aerosols (for weather modification, but also for mosquito and other insect eradication) causes chronic poisoning. This exposure causes severe neurological disorders, including paralysis in humans.”

Now that we are party to this information we must to act on it. It is vital that we support the moratorium taking place in Japan this October. We must join together in calling for an immediate halt to this unprecedented form of covert genocide.  Also, do write to your MP’s and tell them that these global activities are not ‘conspiracy theories’; and that they are taking place without consultation and without any attempt to warn of their likely repercussions.


  1. Dr Coen Vermeeren symposium speech, Delft University of Technology, 29 May 2010, go 35 minutes in.
  2. Catherine Brahic: “Top science body calls for geoengineering ‘plan B’, New Scientist, 1/9/2009
  3. David L Mitchell and William Finnegan, “Modification of Cirrus Clouds to reduce global warming” Environmental Research Letters Vol 4. No 4, 30/10/2009. Subscription only:
  4. ‘About HAARP’ from a paper by Belitsos, Radical Wisdom, 14/7/2010.
  5. For further reading on HAARP see Prof. Michel Chossudovsky: “Owning The Weather” Global Research website.
  6. Rady Ananda, “Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails” 30/07/2010.
  7. Col Tamzy J.House, et al. “Weather as a Force Multiplier: “Owning the Weather in 2025”, Department of Defense U.S. Air Force, 17/06/1996. Publicly released August 1996. Reproduced at Federation of American Scientists:
  8. Weather Modification Website:
  9. Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, “In-Depth Review of the Work on Biodiversity and Climate Change, Draft Recommendations, Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nationa Environmental Programme, UNEP/CBD/SBTTA/l.9, 15/05/2010.
  10. See Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA)
  11. Sept. 7, 2009: (site no longer available) See papers of Dr Hildegarde Staninger on her web site.

By piotrbein