Bronek Chapski: KIDS: THE FACE OF MULTICULTURALISM
These two pages should open multiculturalism’s dark windows. Some of the info here can’t be verified in cold hard terms due to changing cash numbers. However, the painted picture that rests on this canvas, represents actual coloring. The objective: To enhance understanding so others can ambulate on the yellow brick road to peace.
It’s no secret that multiculturalism has been pushed down society’s esophagus. We of the older generation have seen the fight for peoplehood; the bloody Poznan Riots, Czech Spring and Andopov’s Hungarian Revolution. We’ve also heard about the famous bus sit-in. Because of governmental hammering for equalitarianism there was coerced school bussing. This was followed by a middle class loss of billions of dollars and white flight. American citizens wanted the same as captive Soviet peoples; they sought to be themselves. In short, ethnicity, despite denial, proved vital.
As we all know impressions are pertinent. Kids represent homo sapien future. Our boys and girls will determine if greed should be pertinent in mankind’s psych and (2) who will benefit from military occupations, bombing and image-making of “the nemesis.” That’s why this article deals with an element of the future, the next generation.
This is being typed at a time when American progeny are facing economic hardships. It’s in an era of worshiping Martin Luther King like Russian children glorified Lenin. These lines are appearing at a time of family financial crunch and diminishing replacement rates for European American children. You are reading this in an era where countless millions of abortions are as common as lunch in fast food restaurants. No animosity is intended.
Seems monopoly news is slanted. In yesterday’s mainstream paper we read about Israelis demonstrating due to housing costs. There’s no mention of Hebrews taking hundreds of thousands of Palestinian homes or illegal settlements on occupied land. This is why there’s Middle East animosity, wars. It’s why cyberspace poses a threat.
We all know one side of the multicutural coin. It’s the majority seeking to retain values, tradition.
On the other side of the coin is what countless millions in Europe perhaps unfairly refer to as a Jevray (Hebrew) psych. Billions in other lands use different verba to imply the same meaning. Elite hierarchy, team up with the ultra rich and Zionists, to insist that multiculturalism is the way US and Eurabia children must go.
What about themselves? Well, Hebrew journalists insist that it’s no secret that unfortunately, Israel is a result of nations, all over the globe, finding the Zyd to be intrinsically alien, manipulative and overall not trustful. As for the Zydowski (Jewish) psych, millions felt that they were not part of the countries in which their ancestors had been born for hundreds and in some cases thousands of years. They disliked their neighbors and sought to have their own state. As we all know, this was accomplished. It was sort of a mutual agreement. Society sought peace and harmony.
Perhaps if an unwanted element was removed from Europe, children of the next generation(s) would do everything in their power to seek neighborly relations. Journalists spoke of the potential for reducing a mentality that sought property of others. Israel would be a new beginning for Jews. Seems just about everyone wrote about brotherhood.
In the East, Bolshevik intellectual hierarchy was concerned with education oscillating around Universalism. Many Western European academic professionals retained the same philosophy.
Large parts of the noted two groups emigrated to the United States. They retained their dreams of universalism for their new encompassing homogeneous majority. At the same time they fostered extensive sentiment for an element that was alleged to be victimized for thousands of years. This culture changing chutzpah was described as love.
Academia could be seen harboring a mass of individuals with gratefulness for being able to share in America’s bounty of richness. At the same time this element professed dual loyalties. Much of the global Slavic media put what appears to be an antagonistic anti-majorityite Jan Gross in this category (as a symbol). Put another way, Zionism was called many names and it retained numerous strategies to strengthen itself while weakening host majority populations. Harmless anti-Semites and Zionists had field days fighting one another. See Prof. Kevin MacDonald’s works on this.
There were those who emphasized that they sought dialogue. During all this, one Zionist activist, a billionaire and heir to a global liquor empire, is alleged to be a worldwide goodnik philanthropist. His name is Bronfman. Today he is one of Zionism’s key figures (see data on Birthright tours). It seems that he has been instrumental, since around 1980, in donating, what can be called tax-free philanthropy $$$, for youth visiting Jewish places of historical meaning.
Of course, the above noted axle is not alone in globalsyjonizm’s wheel. During a time when Euro-Ams were told to forget their roots, thousands of Zionistic entities sought to solidify tradition. There’s no time to compose a dissertation on this mechanism. It’ll surfice to touch The American Zionist organization. Since around 1999, it spent between 600 million and $1 billion to send nearly 300,000 diaspora Jews on free vacations to visit Israel (and her occupied lands). Children, young adults and others have been told that Israel was a territory without people. It has been written, all over our globe, that the indigenous Palestinian population has been mocked; Pals have been painted in the most unpleasing tones by monopolies that retain a hold and greatly influence info flow within Western society.
Members of the noted organization have affirmed, via numerous writings, that Zionist type members of society provide free airfare and housing to indoctrinate children. Over and over we have read that once European and American Hebrew children vacation in Israel, Israelis provide magic. The “us against them” fires are fed.
It has been read that researchers at Brandeis University verified that about 75% of those visiting Israel retained an everlasting solidarity amongst what they consider to be their people. There are even Birthright films. In one US video educated Benjamin Netanyahu, leader of the fanatical, often called fascist Likud Party, emphasizes that a visit to Israel can alter a life forever.
We read that thousands of young impressionable American and European children dance with Israeli soldiers, shop, go sight-seeing, take pictures and essentially have the time of their lives. This is all done at a most impressionable period of their youthful existence… Many of these J-American kids are just reaching puberty. Copulation? Reproduction?
I had read in Russian, before cardio problems, and recently in Slavic and American publications, that many taking this incredible fun ride are able to do so because of philanthropists located not only in many states, but all over the world. Is this more than a validation of global networking? Are Z-ethno love seeds being planted?
Periodicals have indicated that a Mr. Sheldon Adelson, a multimillionaire element of the blood-sucking casino industry, has contributed over $100 million to this Zionistic seeding. Tel Aviv, of course has contributed much more. Birthright, a key in the touring, has a budget, for this year, alleged to be near $100 million.
In other words, during economic meltdown, the scope of this international Zionistic networking is mind boggling. Zionistic global enterprise is beyond the comprehension of the average Mr. and Mrs. John Doe, Jan Kowalski, Hans Schmidt or Ivan Ivanov (subjected to years of multicultral indoctrination).
How impressionable is a youthful trip to a psychological homeland? Well, some marry and thousands remain. Others, become lifelong activists. If we adjudicate all this, by the treatment doled out to the indigenous Palestinians, it’s easy to wonder about the worldwide “us against them” syndrome and (2) the global transnational image of the Zyd. Certainly such is not advantageous to them or mankind as a whole.
With an army of armed guards, accompanying thousands of Israeli children to Poland, does such an image present comradeship, or peace? In an age of coerced multiculturalism, bonds are being formed and Zionist identity solidified.
The image of Jewish children obtaining indoctrinational tours to Europe and Israel is portrayed by media in a positive light. In a similar goodnik mirror image AIPAC is worshiped by congressmen.
On an individual scale billionaire Marc Rich, an open AIPAC lover, is a founding father of Birthright and other ultra Zionistic entities. He shows the weight of what international Z clout implies. Newspapers indicated that instead of securing the electric chair (long incarceration), he was pardoned by what the likes of Clintonites represent.
As for character, often antagonistic touring Z groups, demand removal of indigenous religious and majority symbols. Although generally hidden by mainstream media, this is more than resented. These Jews leave an impression that might prove to be more than disadvantageous in the long run. Perhaps it’s like continuing to place logs on a fire.
Seen in light it’s easy to comprehend indoctrination of multicultural adherence and wars.