The petition of the century – Bank parasite case appealed to Supreme Court in Sweden

Suppose that someone suddenly came on how one of the Swedish society’s fundamental principles – one of the pillars on which the whole of Swedishsociety rests — is a giant lie and an even greater violation of the law.
Suppose then that same person, against all odds, manages to create a situationwhere “the cornerstone” is tried in court.
This person exists.
His name is Witte, Henning Witte.   Clan Wallenberg via Dolorosa Henning Witte’s stroke of genius was to let the clan Wallenberg flagship SEB, with the usual bankster arrogance, summer 2012 drag him to court in Norrköping in a case concerning a delinquent basic payment rate on a plastic card.
In their appeal to the Supreme Court explains Witte what the controversy is really about:
This court case is one of the most important civil cases ever brought in Sweden, more important than Neurosedynin-case in the 1960s.
Never before has the private banking system been challenged legally on their most tender point: banks manufacture money itself and, moreover, without the support of the law.
Most people think that it is only the Central bank in Sweden – Riksbanken makesmoney and that private banks lending money they already have, either throughdeposits or that they themselves borrowed money from the Bank or another.
The private banks ‘ surreptitiously taken privilege to be able to produce money (whichis why a license is so expensive), causing great damage to society.
Not only that, it allows a surreptitious expropriation of seven different levels, it causes massunemployment, inflation, high taxes, government debt, unnecessarily expensive products and much more.
If only the “Riksbanken” had the opportunity to make money, would all these socialproblems not exist, then it would only be legal tender in circulation.
A Court ascertains that the digital money that private banks manufactures, are illegal tender, and therefore not refundable, is of central importance for Swedish society as a whole and can be the starting point for a monetary reform which introduces stable and honest relationships in Sweden.
It is of the utmost importance for the management of the law that this case be tried by the Supreme Court, because private banks ‘ illegal ways of issuing money along withthe “Riksbanken” is damaging and shakes the entire community in its foundations.
Those who want to support lawyer Henning Witte that “bank parasite target” in HDcan join in the petition below: [2]
The Swedish basic law has given us a unique leverage to improve economicprosperity in Sweden from the Foundation, which in turn causes a strong boost for democracy, power is transmitted from the banks/big business to the population.
The relieving rule in the Constitution, see 9. Chapter 14 § second movement Constitution: “provisions on the monetary and payment system will be notifiedotherwise by the law.”
The most important part of the monetary system is the right to make money.  Parliament has therefore only by a law given the Riksbank this powerful right. The Riksbank may make cash and digital money, so-called legitimate money.
When most do not understand that digital cash is money and the cash has private banks surreptitiously taken itself the freedom to also issue digital money, which today hasled to a cash only is approx. 4.1% of all Swedish kronor.   The digital money that private banks do out of thin air by granting a credit money isillegal, because there is not a law, either in Sweden or the EU, which gives themsuch a privilege.
To expose this abuse of power from the banks is what HenningWitte’s case against SEB.
HD shall smite with the fist on the table and prohibit banks to make money without the support of the law and Parliament shall regulate thematter by a law.
Banks ‘ issuance of fake money on the sly is a pyramid scheme that has led to massunemployment, inflation and other woes.
Because money “created” in this way,without interest, the interest rate banks also require, cause there is always too littlemoney in society.
This creates a situation that with mathematical certainty over timemore and more of the country’s power assets into the private bankers trunks.
But it gets worse: the private bankers the ability to increase or decrease the”creation” of artificial money makes them the Group de facto control, inter alia, the Swedish economy’s business cycles.
It is easily understood that when the clan Wallenberg is in a good mood and sounds including SEB grant much loans, increasing the money supply in the community. This creates “drag in one size” in the Swedish economy, i.e. a so-called economic boom.
When the Wallenberg people, on the other hand, is less sunny mood and lendingbecomes restrictive, perhaps even negative, shows the economy-even though allfactories, shops and people who are demanding goods and services remain, i.e. aso-called slump.
This is what lawyer Henning Witte’s test case against “the banking parasites” is about-returning to the people’s democratic institutions, the exclusive right to createmoney and power over the Swedish economy from the private forces that stealingthis.
Act now as anything other than a dictatorship’s lackey and drag Your bit and stopbankers dictatorship before Sweden joins the same fate as recently stricken southern Europe.
Support the requirement that Supreme Court takes up the banking parasites target: T12 and T 2388-627-13 Göta Court of appeal Entire website:
http://kristofferhell.net/arhundradets-upprop-bankparasitmalet-till-hogsta-domstolen/
Laywer Henning Witte’s article:  http://www.whitetv.se/sv/gigantiskt-pyramidspel/538.html