- Page 1 of 5
- 1
- 2
- 3
#1
WWWTT Posted 19 June 2013 – 06:57 PM
http://www.presstv.i…lls-fraudulent/
First,I am concerned why a story like this is getting very little traction?
Then the obvious,what are the consequences of fraud?
waldo Posted 27 June 2013 – 08:43 AM

Actually no, it’s easy to say. All the complainants had to do was find just one person who was affected and would have established at least some credibility to their case.
just one? madmax, on 25 Aug 2012 – 8:18 PM, said:
A signed affidavit indicates that 150 to 200 voters in Guelph showed up at a phony vote location at the Quebec Street Mall and some voters ripped up their voter identification cards in anger
That is the intent of voter suppression….
They did talk about this in QP and of course, when ask about such things, the Tories attack the person asking the question rather than stand up and admit mistakes were made but then again, it take a honest person to do such a thing.
#3
BubberMiley Posted 19 June 2013 – 07:17 PM
That’s some hilarious spin in that story. The judgement HAS been talked about, and reported on most news sites. Contrary to the Council of Canadians claim, it is THEIR case that was defeated, as the judge found no evidence that any member, volunteer, or employed third party with any connection to he CPC had any role in any fraud of any sort. They also failed to find a single Canadian who was prevented from voting.
#6
ReeferMadness Posted 19 June 2013 – 08:20 PM
People are so apathetic. That’s the pathetic part of apathetic. A country gets the government it deserves and God help us, apparently we deserve Harper. Some bad karma there somewhere.
#7
waldo Posted 19 June 2013 – 09:04 PM

the judge found no evidence that any member, volunteer, or employed third party with any connection to he CPC had any role in any fraud of any sort.
how was the Conservative Party of Canada’s CIMS database accessed… who would have access to the CIMS database?
Federal Court judge Richard Mosley said
I am satisfied that [it] has been established that misleading calls about the locations of polling stations were made to electors in ridings across the country, including the subject ridings, and that the purpose of those calls was to suppress the votes of electors who had indicated their voting preference in response to earlier voter identification calls.I am satisfied, however, that the most likely source of the information used to make the misleading calls was the CIMS database maintained and controlled by the [Conservative Party of Canada], accessed for that purpose by a person or persons currently unknown to this court.
#8
Bryan Posted 19 June 2013 – 11:17 PM
A better question is, where are these people whose votes were suppressed? Ten of thousands of them supposedly existed, according to the CBC and the opposition, but the judge couldn’t find a single one. Not ONE?
#9
WWWTT Posted 20 June 2013 – 03:04 AM

He said he THINKS that it was likely. That’s his personal political opinion, not a finding of fact. The reality is, he had no evidence of the sort. If he had a shred of evidence, the judgement would have been very different.
A better question is, where are these people whose votes were suppressed? Ten of thousands of them supposedly existed, according to the CBC and the opposition, but the judge couldn’t find a single one. Not ONE?
Actually,from what it looks like,waldo highlighted the judges ruling,not the judges personal political opinion.
Also,the ruling states that misleading calls were made.Don’t need to find people who were mislead to come to that finding.
#10 scribblet Posted 20 June 2013 – 03:17 AM

That’s some hilarious spin in that story. The judgement HAS been talked about, and reported on most news sites. Contrary to the Council of Canadians claim, it is THEIR case that was defeated, as the judge found no evidence that any member, volunteer, or employed third party with any connection to he CPC had any role in any fraud of any sort. They also failed to find a single Canadian who was prevented from voting.
Exactly, it has been discussed, this is the same story reported in May with a major spin on it, omitting those facts. The radical left wing Council of Canadians can’t get over their court loss.
http://www.cbc.ca/ne…t-decision.html
Mosley said he was not finding that the Conservative Party, its candidates or the suppliers providing live and automated robocalls were directly involved in “the campaign to mislead voters.”
#12
waldo Posted 20 June 2013 – 05:05 AM
Bryan, on 19 Jun 2013 – 11:17 PM, said:
He said he THINKS that it was likely. That’s his personal political opinion, not a finding of fact.
I see… so… the parts of the court/judge’s findings you like are facts… the parts you do not care for, those are… political opinions! But, again: “how was the Conservative Party of Canada’s CIMS database accessed… who would have access to the CIMS database?”
………………………
Confirmed: Canada 2011 polls fraudulent
The court emphasized in a Thursday ruling that it has found in no uncertain terms that widespread election fraud took place during the vote.
The ruling also stated that “there was an orchestrated effort to suppress votes during the 2011 election campaign by a person with access to the [Conservative Party’s] CIMS database.”
Accordingly, the Council of Canadians has called on the Conservative Party to investigate the issue. It says anything less at this point would be a cover-up on behalf of the Conservatives.
The Council of Canadians says that the non-cooperation, obstructionism, and attempts to disrupt the Federal Court case by the CIMS makes it look like Prime Minister Harper has something to conceal.
Garry Neil, Executive Director of the Council of Canadians said “This Federal Court decision is a major indictment of the Conservative Party of Canada.”
“Either senior leaders of the Conservative Party were directly involved in election fraud or they were astoundingly negligent in securing access to their voter database. Illegal or incompetent–just like in the Senate scandal.”
YH/HN
93.7K
1 comment
Comments are closed.