A great way to separate truth sites from disinfo sites
- Category: Jim Stone
- Created on 16 July 2013
- Written by Jim Stone
“Jeff Rense took me off his show after saying he had been “under a lot of pressure,” to do so after I started exposing Fukushima, as you have, as a terrorist mass murder psyops. Rense’s attitude towards me changed after the owners of his radio network sold their network to a group called Clearstream. Clearstream is apparently owned by J.P. Morgan and thus leads to the Bush family.
Mr. Rense sold his soul. His lies and propaganda about Fukushima are proof. By participating in the cover up of what really happened there, he is an accessory to mass murder.
Please try to confirm the financial connection with the Bushes through your sources as well. Thanks and keep up the excellent work.” – Benjamin Fulford in a note to Jim Stone
There are three great nuclear related topics which can be used as a litmus test to know when a web site is real or run by a member of the opposition. Fortunately many of the big ones, such as Alex Jones, Natural News, and many of the smaller ones are true opposition, though a few may argue that Alex Jones is not. But he does pass this particular nuclear litmus test. Anyone who fails this test, which is an easy one, can only be the opposition because the truth is simply too self evident.
1.The Japan earthquake was not as presented.
Fukushima was nuclear sabotage and the 9.0 earthquake never happened. All you need to know this fact is to look at the pictures of the perfectly un damaged cities as the nuclear tsunami rolls in, the Sendai damage reports, which reported zero collapsed structures, and the seismic records, which show the peak magnitude was 6.67 and 100 KM inland.
Reactor 4, which was defueled and had the core removed entirely for a scheduled replacement of the internal stainless steel shroud proved Fukushima sabotage when it “exploded”. Tepco has the receipts for the shroud, has proven the reactor was not only offline but completely disassembled as well, and has announced this publicly. Reputable news sites reported this fact, and even a few spurious ones did as well. But if you are on the bandwagon with Arnie Gundersen, the cold hard truth – there is no way reactor 4 could have exploded while sitting wide open and without a core absent planted extreme high magnitude explosives will be a mystery to you. And since ANY prompt criticality requires an absolute minimum of 70 percent enriched fuel and would have vaporized all the rods if it happened in the fuel pool, Arnie with his “prompt criticality” is a jack booted thug of Fukushima disinfo.
When all walls are added, reactor 4 had over 20 feet of concrete between the reactor and the outside of the containment in all directions but straight up, where it was five feet thick yet had all walls blown to smithereens to the North, South and West, and badly damaged to the East. Such a blast is beyond the reach of conventional explosives and can only be accomplished in a single blast with a nuclear weapon. The hydrogen theory is laughable when the facility was fully purged with nitrogen, and the liberation of hydrogen takes place between pressurized steam and zircon at no less than 2000 degrees celsius. With no core in the reactor, the fuel pool would have boiled off 1,900 degrees before any hydrogen liberation could have taken place, so between the nitrogen purge and no hydrogen present anyway, the hydrogen story at reactor 4 is laughable. Whether or not you agree with what it would take to blow away 20 feet of concrete, take a look at this classified photo which was uploaded to PinkTentacle by a whistleblowing nuclear engineer who worked at Fukushima and look at the disassembled reactor. This is Fukushima’s building 7:
Here is the picture of the nuke that blew reactor 3. The one at 4 was similar.
If you want more details on this topic, read the Fukushima report. WRH, NaturalNews, Icke, and even Infowars had enough honesty and balls to link this report, and Henry Makow took a severe hit over it. And I beg to question why he had to.
2. Stuxnet, which was written by the CIA and handed to Israel on a silver platter, caused the disasters at reactors 1 and 2, and mayhem at reactor 3 before the nuclear weapon, peddled off as a security camera by Israel, finished the job at 3. Reactors 3 and 4 had enhanced safety systems which would have prevented any virus from destroying them, so those two got the nukes.
But that is beside the point with regard to Stuxnet. Here’s the kicker –
The Washington Times, Drudge Report, Infowars, WRH, Icke, Natural News, and any other site worth it’s salt, reported that Stuxnet destroyed Fukushima by causing mayem in the safety shut down systems. Any site that avoided this topic and instead did nothing at all but trumpet ENE news and other nuclear scammers should be avoided, because if it is hidden from the public – the real reason why Fuku went haywire, it will lead to a culture of ignorance where Israeli attackers can destroy any facility they can manage to get a virus into. Magna BSP provided this opportunity at Fukushima. And Israel destroyed Fukushima to prove to Japan that there were no limits to what they would do to anyone who helped Iran with it’s nuclear program, and as a side kicker, the Japanese were strongly opposing Jewish cultural influence and financial domination. That all changed after the Fuku disaster which maimed the country badly. And anyone who avoids the topic of Stuxnet and Fukushima is aiding and abetting the zionists in their next attack, because such an attack can only be accomplished against an unaware public.
3. America’s nuclear facilities have been intentionally turned into ticking time bombs.
America’s nuclear facilities were never designed to handle all the “spent” fuel they are currently holding. And the fact that they are holding so much is an outright act of war by the Federal Government against America, and it cannot be any other way than that.
When doing the investigation into Fukushima, I had the opportunity to interview the lead engineer on the team that designed Fukushima #3. And he was not nearly as interested in Fukushima as he was in the banning of the closed loop nuclear fuel cycle. Initially, when all the nuclear facilities were designed and installed, they were done so with the calculation that the nuclear fuel cycle would be successfully closed (as the Fuku 3 engineer put it, “closing the nuclear loop”), where when fuel could not be run in a boiling water reactor anymore because it’s characteristics changed too much, it could, without reprocessing and in the same rods, be loaded directly into a different type of reactor and used as fresh fuel. When the complimentary reactor was done with the fuel it could be loaded straight back into the boiling water reactor and run as new.
After designing Fukushima, this engineer became the lead engineer in this project, and they succeeded in closing the nuclear fuel cycle in 1976. They were going to go operational with this technology in ALL the nuclear facilities as was originally planned when they were built, to prevent an enormous buildup of “spent” fuel that really was not spent at all. The fuel in American power facilities is good for approximately 20 cycles using this technology, and with the technology banned it is good for only ONE. This forced the nuclear industry to keep storing fuel in facilities that were only designed to handle a delay of this technology of 15 years. The technology was delivered in three years, and for no good reason at all Carter banned it via executive order.
I questioned this engineer over the safety of the system, and he said there was never any problem at all, and it was all political mind games to get it banned. He lamented the waste of fuel, but I saw things differently. Unlike this engineer, I knew the Zionist controlled Federal Government has long been the enemy of the American people, and I saw the banning of the technology as an act of war. Now we have facilities with 40X the spent fuel they were supposed to have sitting all over America just waiting for the right sequence of problems to cause a huge disaster. If ANYTHING goes wrong and one of those fuel caches catches fire, ANYTHING, like a smart bomb, a Stuxnet attack, or a nuclear war, it’s bye bye and every affected nuclear facility is going to become a nation destroying pit of hell. AND IT WAS DONE ON PURPOSE.
ANY WEB SITE WHICH AVOIDS THIS TOPIC, AND INSTEAD BLAMES THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY FOR THE WASTE PROBLEM IS A FRAUDULENT WEB SITE WHICH IS SERVING THE GOALS OF THE GLOBAL ELITE – TO DESTROY AMERICA WITH A FUTURE NUCLEAR ARMAGEDDON. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT BANNING THE CLOSED FUEL CYCLE CAUSED.
People think I got shilled really hard over the Fukushima report, but in reality there is no topic I have taken more heat over than this one – the intentional setup of America for a nuclear armageddon when there never was any excuse for it. When these nuclear facilities melt down and burn put the blame in ONE PLACE – the zionist controlled Federal Government, the zionists always hated America for it’s freedom and when they forced this enormous nuclear disaster in waiting on this country it was no doubt an end game plan to destroy us. This future cannot be avoided now absent immediate action to prevent it and you will NEVER see that action taken. We really are just one pump failure, irreparable pipe break, virus attack or smart bomb away from absolute catastrophe JUST LIKE FUKUSHIMA and since none of the fuel pools caught fire at Fuku, America’s future will no doubt be worse. Any site that calls this site a psy op black op should be severely questioned, ESPECIALLY when that site avoids this topic and the other two like the plague, to such an extent they will destroy others for even discussing them. My hat goes off to Henry Makow, a very good Jew who bit it big time in the name of the truth, and his faithful readers who stuck with him and the many others who did not give a damn about the threats issued by a single zealot.
A version of this article was first published on jimstonefreelance.com.