CDSAPI ALERTS: EM radiation, Agent Orange, flu vax kill

From: “cdsapi” <[email protected]>
Date: January 14, 2014 12:56:44 PM PST (CA)
Subject: Stop exposing children to radiation from WiFi and 4G in schools until proven harmless”
Please sign the petition on the website
Cdsapi’s Added Comment:
The issue of WiFi, EMFs, Microwave Radiation,  Smart Meters, Cell phones and Cell Tower transmissions is extremely important –  but one to which most people are not paying sufficient attention because electromagnetic frequencies and radiation are so “invisible”, hence out of sight.
In the last 30 years, this Wireless EMF technology has become the very center and essence of “modern communication”, leading to an explosion of Expedient, Convenient Wireless Devices” that almost everyone now considers “essential”.
The fact that this technology threatens the biological functions of our body (especially the neurology of children and prenatal development)  looms like a proverbial sword over our heads.
Are we willing to sacrifice our health and the development of future generations for expediency and convenience”?
Are we prepared to sacrifice our children as “acceptable risk” as we continue to embrace an inherently dangerous technology?
Is it irresponsible idiocy or insanity to continue to blindly engage in, and expand, this mass experiment that envelopes and encapsulates everyone in a cocoon of electro-smog –  and then start asking questions of prudence after we are forced to deal with the dire and no-longer-deniable consequences staring us in the face.?
Stop exposing children to radiation from WiFi and 4G in schools until proven harmless
Why this is important
School children are facing a massive health crisis if the governments and education authorities continue to ignore the warnings on the potential health effects from long-term exposure to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices.
Many scientists and medical experts warn that long-term exposure to EMR interferes with the body’s internal bioelectrical signals which may lead to diseases such as cancer, immune dysfunction, infertility, reproductive disorders, DNA damage and other cognitive and neurological disorders.  Children are also most vulnerable as they absorb more radiation due to their thinner skulls, bones and developing cells.  Their life-time exposure will also be greater than adults today.
Scientific studies on the long-term health effects of WiFi on children have not been conducted, yet this technology is being vigorously rolled out in schools without parental consent or choice.  Children are being involuntarily exposed to wireless radiation for 6 hours a day, 5 days a week. This is unacceptable as there are safer wired options for schools to provide children with internet access.
Let’s raise our voices calling on the EU to adopt the precautionary principle, and to act now to protect our children and future generations.  Stop the use of WiFi and 4G internet in schools until long-term exposure is proven harmless.
Favour wired internet connections, and reduce microwave electromagnetic radiation exposure from all wireless devices.
Please sign this urgent petition and share it with everyone you know.
For the facts on WiFi in schools and scientific evidence go to
Please get informed,  take action and   pass on this knowledge.
Dangers of Cell Phones, Smart Meters and other Wireless Technology
From Dr. Ali Amiri  –  Coquitlam Family Chiropractic: I didn’t think this topic was a real health concern until I saw this movie. This movie is a real eye opener. If you value your health, you need to see this movie.
Watch the trailer to the movie
Are CELL PHONES Safe? Learn practical tools on how to protect yourself from developing brain cancer.
Are SMART METERS SAFE? It’s a LOT worse than you think.  Learn about the serious health side effects of being exposed to Smart Meters and EMF.
Urgent!- Help Stop Approval of Agent Orange Corn  –  Please Share

Is The USDA Really Dumb Enough To Approve Agent Orange Corn?

Is The USDA Really Dumb Enough To Approve Agent Orange Corn?
The Obama administration announced last week that it expects to approve corn and soybeans that have been genetically engineered by Dow Chemical company to tolerate the toxic herbicide — 2,4-D.  They are planning this approval despite the fact that use of this herbicide is associated with increased rates of deadly immune system cancers, Parkinson’s disease, endocrine disruption, birth defects, and many other serious kinds of illness and reproductive problems.!submitComment;D=APHIS-2013-0042-0050
cdsapi’s Added Comment:
Note:  2,4-D is one of the ingredients of Agent Orange that was (and is) responsible for so many children (still) being born with horrific birth defect.
Our government jumps from polices of idiocy to policies of criminal insanity to accommodate the demands of Corporate vested interests.
When do we stop blanketing the continent with ever more toxic killer chemicals, racing to the point of biological collapse with no return?
“Man is the only species that idiotically engineers and finances its own destruction, and does so in the name of “economic necessity”.  i.h.
The Deadly Truth About Flu Vaccines and Pregnancy
Cdsapi’s Added Comment: “They lie through their teeth”  –
It might be a good idea to read the following article before you or your family join the frightened lemmings stampeding to the nearest Flu-Vaccination clinic to get the heavily promoted “Flu Vaccine”, afraid that there might not be one left for them.  (That would be a blessing!  This is especially true for pregnant women – considering that there was a confirmed 4250% increase in miscarriages immediately following the H1N1 flu shot (1909-1910).
The Deadly Truth About Flu Vaccines and Pregnancy
Written By: Gary Null, PhD
Why does the CDC claim a flu vaccine during pregnancy is a safe and effective when even the H1N1 vaccine insert clearly states this is not true?
According to all official health reports, we are now fully in flu season.  It is that time of year when public health officials, physicians pediatricians and pharmacists warn that everyone over 6 months of age and older should protect themselves and get vaccinated.  This includes renewed propaganda to influence pregnant women to protect their unborn child and to threaten healthcare workers with job termination if they refuse vaccination.
A recent case that has received widespread media attention across the major networks was the firing of a pregnant nurse, Dreonna Breton, from her job at Horizon Healthcare Services in Lancaster Pennsylvania for refusing the flu vaccine.
Having waded through the scientific research about flu vaccine safety, Breton made the decision to reject because she felt the lack of safety outweighed the vaccine’s benefits.
Hence her employer fired her without giving due consideration to her personal OBGYN’s recommendations nor the scientific evidence she provided in support of her refusal.  The official dogma, still touted by the mainstream media, is that the flu vaccine is effective, safe and there is no need for pregnant women to avoid vaccination.
The question with all vaccines has always been whether or not the studies support federal official and the medical establishment’s claims.
There is a very simple reason why the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists notes on their website that “no study to date has seen an adverse consequence of inactivate influenza vaccine in pregnant women and their offspring.”
This is because no such study has been accurately designed and  performed to determine the flu vaccine’s safety in pregnant women.
The ACOG and CDC are not legally required to tell the truth about anything.  They can spin words and science to their heart’s content without legal repercussions for wrong doing or criminal behavior.  Nobody takes these associations and the federal agencies to court for cherry picking their studies or conducting remarkably poor clinical trials in order to promote their personal agendas and lies.  However, private vaccine makers are required to provide the most accurate information available to vaccine administering physicians and healthcare workers on manufacturing package inserts.  This is not only required to educate physicians about the vaccines being given to their patients, but also to provide a rough guideline in the event of vaccine adverse effects and injury.
And what do we find on these inserts?  Almost categorically, there is the warning that “safety and effectiveness have not been established in pregnant women or nursing mothers” for these flu vaccines.
There is a single question that needs to be answered: what is the actual gold standard proof to claim that the flu vaccine is safe for pregnant women and will not harm her fetus?   There is none.
Nor is there any valid evidence that flu vaccines are effective.
In an interview with Dr. Thomas Jefferson, coordinator for the Cochrane Vaccine Field in Rome, Italy, he stated that in 2009 he conducted a thorough review of 217 published studies on flu vaccines andfound only 5% reliable.  In other words, 95% of published flu vaccine studies are flawed and their conclusions should be dismissed.  This is not a great surprise; even CDC officials were  forced to confess that “influenza vaccines are still among the least effective immunizing agents available, and this seems to be particularly true for elderly recipients.”[1]  Dr. Anthony Morris, a distinguished virologist and a former Chief Vaccine Office at the FDA, found “there is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza.’  Dr. Morris stated, “The producers of these vaccines know they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.”[2]
In 2013, Dr. Peter Doshi at MIT and Johns Hopkins University  published a devastating report in the British Medical Journal discrediting the official fear tactics about flu season.  In the report Doshi stated, “The vaccine may be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and the threat of influenza seems to be overstated.”  He notes that a study published by an Australian team found that “one in every 110 children under the age of five had convulsions following vaccinations in 2009 for HINI influenza.”[3]
Separate independent studies conducted in the UK, Finland and Sweden concur that the flu vaccine directly contributed to the rise in cases of narcolepsy following receipt of GlaxoSmithKline’s Pandemrix vaccine.  The conclusion is that the vaccine triggered an immune reaction against the children’s sleep center cells.[4]   If these serious events are occurring among children, what are the true adverse effects happening to an unborn developing fetus in the womb when the mother is vaccinated?
The CDC’s website states, “if you are pregnant, a flu shot is your best protection against serious illness from the flu.  A flu shot can protect pregnant women, their unborn babies and even the baby after birth.”
Is there any scientific truth to this claim?[5]
We would expect that if this were true, then we would find this mentioned on the flu vaccine package inserts.  But we don’t. For example, for the H1N1 vaccine inserts, we find “It is not known whether these vaccines can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women or can affect reproduction capacity.”
Surprisingly few vaccine studies have been performed on pregnant women.  And none of them according to Dr. Jefferson are “high quality.”  While some extremely poor trials have been conducted, the CDC’s National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Disease research into the potential dangers and risks of the flu vaccine to both mom and fetus is negligible.  After evaluating all flu vaccine studies on pregnant women, and finding them “artificial” in the way they were designed and carried out, Dr. Jefferson concludes that “I would be very very cautious about vaccinating unborn babies.”[6]
The New York Times published an article touting the CDC myth of flu vaccine safety for pregnant women.  The Times quoted Dr. Jay Butler, CDC’s chief of the swine flu vaccine task force to relieve fears about flu vaccine adverse effects, especially to pregnant women.  Dr. Butler said, “There are about 2,400 miscarriages a day in the US.  You’ll see things that would have happened anyway.  But the vaccine doesn’t cause miscarriages.  It also doesn’t cause auto accidents, but they happen.”[7]
Not very reassuring to expectant mothers across the country, especially since none of the approved H1N1 vaccines used at that time had undergone rigorous clinical safety trials on pregnant women or the potential adverse effects of mercury-laced vaccines and other ingredients, such as spermacide, detergent and cosmetics, on the developing fetus.
In 2012, the National Coalition of Organized Women received documents with statistics based upon the government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) covering the 2009 and 2010 flu season. The CDC’s own vaccine injury data collection revealed a 4,250% increase in fetal deaths after the flu shot.  The VAERS statistics were confirmed later by Dr. Gary Goldman and published in the Human and Environmental Toxicology Journal showing that the HINI swine flu vaccine did in fact cause a 4,250% rise in spontaneous abortions.
The CDC has refused to provide further information under a Freedom of Information Act filing until after a three year period, a direct violation of  FIOA law.  When confronted and queried about the rise in fetal deaths among vaccinated pregnant mothers, the CDC’s Dr. Shimabkuru confirmed the agency knew of this increase.[8]
A study appearing in the journal Vaccine provides a strong warning against administering the flu vaccine to pregnant woman.[9]  The study observed a rise in inflammation in pregnant woman that relates directly to preeclampsia and leading to premature births.  Commenting upon this study, Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMedInfo, wrote this should be expected given the “highly inflammatory, neurotoxic and immunotoxic” ingredients found in flu vaccines.
In 2009 during the height of the swine flu, we published a review a safety trials conducted by the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases for pregnant women, persons with asthma, and the co-administration of the H1N1 and seasonal flu vaccines in healthy adults and the elderly.  Once again these studies display the power of deceptive science for propaganda use.   At that time, results were twisted, kneaded and molded into a smiley face, plastered on the CDC’s and pro-vaccine health websites, and aired across the media waves to convince us to rush to our nearest vaccination facility.
Those particular NIAID studies were performed in collaboration with Novartis and Sanofi Pasteur, each a manufacturer of an approved H1N1 vaccine.  Novartis’ Head of Strategic Immunization Planning, Dr. Clement Levin, and Sanofi Pasteur’s President Damian Braga sat as representatives on the CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP).  The vaccine industrial complex is therefore involved in making our health choices for us.  Furthermore, a review of all the clinical sites where the trials will be conducted reveals that most had representation on the ACIP.  There was no indication of any independent research entitiesparticipating in the trials without financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
The pregnancy study only included 120 women, and one of the exclusion criteria included any woman whose temperature rises to 100 degrees F or higher during the first 72 hours after injection being removed from the study.  This last point is a clear example of a confounder intentionally inserted into the study because adverse side effects that may appear in any of these women would not be included in the final data analysis.
The American public has every reason to be suspicious over our health officials vaccination claims and to hold them in distrust and even contempt.  Citizens’ confidence in the flu vaccine’s safety has dropped dramatically across the developed countries.  Our tax dollars are spending approximately several billions of dollars annually to mass-vaccinate the American population with a biological product without any scientifically concise proof of safety and efficacy.  But our distrust should not be based on the incestuous romance between government and the vaccine industry, although this surely exists.
Instead, the policy decisions being ruled by our national Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice rely on exceptionally bad science.  This is what should alarm Americans because it undermines the very foundation of medicine as an art to prevent disease, pain and suffering.  So to our health bureaucrats, “It’s the science, stupid!”
[1] Kidder D, Scmitz R. Measures of costs and morbidity in the analysis of vaccine effectiveness based on Medicare claims. In Hannoun C, et al. Eds. Options for the Control of Influenza 11. Amsterdam: Excerpts Medica, 1993; 127-33.
[2] Patrick, Jay. “Flu Vaccines ‘Worthless’ Says Eminent FDA Virologist.”
[3] Hubbard SB. “Johns Hopkins Scientist Slams Flu Vaccine.” Vaccine Information Network, May 16, 2013.
[4] “Glaxo’s Swine Flu Shot Linked to Narcolepsy in UK Kids.”  Bloomberg, February 26, 2013.
[5]  Pregnant Women Need a Flu Shot
[6]  Interview with Dr. Tom Jefferson, “The Gary Null Show” Progressive Radio Network, January 8, 2012
[7] McNeil, Donald. “Don’t blame flu shots for all ills, officials say” New York Times. September 28, 2009
[8] Dannemann E. “4,250% increase in fetal death reports covered up by the CDC”

By piotrbein