Thank you for that, so now we know we are on a firmer footing, however I am sure it is an agenda as the technology has the overcapacity to kill and is a weapon. Weapons only have one purpose and that is to kill. See attached. This is the beam forming kill grid proposal for Glasgow. It is not a telecommunications system, that is only a masquerade maybe if the telecommunications industry understood that they are going to kill their customers they might think differently. Oh by the way each transmitter here requires a 150m public exclusion to fit within the ICNIRP guideline which is a cooking value.
From: Réza Ganjavi
Sent: 31 January 2020 09:07
To: Mark Steele and list
Subject: Response to Mark Steele
I am fighting against the crooks (wireless industry) — see www.emfcrisis.com — see this mega letter I conceived of and coordinated: https://emfcrisis.yolasite.com/hardell-calling-out-roosli.php
WHEN I don’t have to waste time dealing with unlawful actions against my rights.
So please don’t mix the two.
“Can we firstly agree that 5G is a weapons system.”
That’s a fact that is well documented, that 5G is used in weapon systems. I believe your point is, because it damages our DNA, it is a weapon. I tend to agree. Some might find it a far fetched idea since other things that damage our DNA , like smoking , are not considered weapons. But in the case of 5G, I share your belief.
“Secondly can we also agree that C02 and the UN – EU push for dangerous uninsurable untested technologies harmful to the environment to mitigate the fake C02 agenda that include 5G weaponry are deployed as a covert plan to commit genocide on the people.”
Mark, I have not had time to independently and objectively verify all that is said in the above paragraph — which is heavy and contains a lot of concepts — each of which needs verification. But my personal belief/impression is, that the climate move is over – exaggerated — I have serious concern about XR leadership’s alleged ties to the wireless industry. I find the timing of 5G deployment and XR big bang extremely suspicious and think it may be a diversion tactic.
Regarding CO2 I have read from both sides — one of the founders of Greenpeace said it’s fake.
I do not believe the wireless executives in Switzerland that I’m banging heads against have the agenda to kill people. They just want people’s money. If they kill people there’s nobody to use their service.
On a more global basis, I have no idea if that is anybody’s agenda or not. Again, I think money is the main motive, and they need customers — so if they kill the customers there’s no money. I am not denying such an agenda exists.
“Its pretty obvious that the law has been broken with the illegal unlawful deployment. for those who obfuscate over this a true crime is committed as everyone and every Judge does know. Ignorance is no defence in law.”
I 100% agree.