[discussion] Info-junk and bunk hurt anti-5G in the scam-demic — How are we going to react?

Piotr Bein, 4.1.2020

A member of Coalition “Poland Free of 5G”, independent  genocide researcher, and pro publico bono publicist and blogger,  I am totally against basing our public educatiuon efforts on junk science. We would be laughed at by professionals and much of the public if we tried to prop up anti-5G campaigns with conjectures, fabrications and other material devoid of fact.

Concernimg the relation of wireless to SARS epidemics, there is very scanty solid info  among copious material being distributed and quoted. The public learns rubbish  that is readily undermined by Big Telecom’s propaganda, casting doubts also on the other aspects of our efforts to educate the public.

Inadvertently, info-junk is distributed along with valuable material by activists who lack expertise to assess an article or video. For example, the article by Professor Payeras i Cifre on 5G relation to Covid-19 contains the following flaws, in my opinion.

  • A scientific study of a relationship to “incidence of infections”, an entity based on error-crippled diagnostic test, and fraudulent and arbitrary standards (vastly varying between countries, cities and hospitals) cannot possibly produce meaningful results.
  • A hypothesized “direct correlation” is likely spurious, and the “relationship” a conjecture, unless derived with statistical rigour. One may as well hypothesize urban development, noise and air pollution in the cause-effect relation and “prove” the hypotheses with respective maps.
  • Fixation on 5G is self-deceit, as SARS viruses are triggered/enhanced by frequencies emitted by earlier generations featuring different bands and spectrums, incl. sound frequencies and those modulated onto the carrier signal — according to Dr. Wojtkowiak and ref. 10 she cites. If I understan, the virus trigger could also come via radio and TV.
  • The article’s No. 1 chart: the most infected countries, annotated that they all receive 5G satellite signals. What countries with negligible infection incidence receive such signals? Why should it be 5G when we know that world powers can separately emit torsion field signals from Space influencing life-steering flow of info, incl. capability to kill and make ill (or heal and strenghten).
  • Comparing jurisdictions on a given date is subject to errors due to variations in factors such as number of tests/diagnoses administered, stage of epidemic (onset, peak, decline), effect of natural torsion fields that vary across the Earth’s surface at a given time.
  • Differences across borders may be due to diagnostic testing policy, population age distribution, and mandatory vaccination regime, for example.
  • Chart No. 4: San Marino (pop. 33k) should be compared with other cities and towns, not with whole countries. Sample size affects precision of results, while social differences such as averaged out densities of 5G infrastructure and population skew the results.
  • Chart No. 5: Comparison of Italian cities includes only 5G by Vodaphone.
  • Chart No. 13 — Equipped with 5G or not, military bases are most vulnerable to epidemics, beside hospitals, schools, prisons, stadiums and big conferences.
  • And so on…

To the same junk genre belong statements on 60 GHz as the cause of respiratory failure in Covid-19.  It is hogwash patented by crackpot Joe Imbraiano who believes in flat Earth, too. This frequency can’t possibly be modulated onto the 5G carrier signal (max. about 30 GHz), and when beamed from, say, an alleged antenna on wheels from 1 km dstance, it is diluted a milion-fold., never mind beaming from satellites scores of km up in the sky.

The globalist scam-demic is panic enough, we don’t need to spice it up and lose face in the process. Such biased and sub-standard info enjoys undeserved respect of some anti-5G’ers, contributing to public disinfo and harming the movement by feeding propaganda against us, while valuable solid info and opinions are diluted if not ignored in our ranks.

.

What are we going to do about this problem?

.

We have to change the haphazrad ways we do things in this department. Otherwise we play into the hands of the global crime syndicate. An example from the past: Appeal Stop 5G on Earth and in Space leaned to globalist indoctrination on fake anthropogenic climate change.

For starters, without much upheaval in the existing grassroot structure, where by natural talent, profession and volunteering some persons create material, others publicize and distrubute  it, we should have some scientific oversight on basis of contents and fact to decide what should be selected and endorsed for dissemination and with what caveats. At present, too many activists and publicists  play scientists without having the slightest qualifications, nor even possessing common sense that they substitute with anti-wireless ideology.

Once we come to grips with such simple scheme, we may think of more sophistication: a strategized, structured and streamlined approach. Selecting material with scientific oversight before dissemination will also be flexible to adversary’s current technology implemetation (example: installation of LED lamp posts, deployment of 5G near hospitals), counter-propaganda direction and repairing the movement’s own failures and errors.

===========================

PB to a group of int’l anti-5G leaders: Dear All, Two int’l activism issues today, both concerning info dissemination that impacts the effectiveness and reputation of anti-wireless movement globally. Who is going to do something about it — Stop5G International?

1. Junk & bunk sources
Much has been said about coronavirus – wireless relation. Most of it is baloney, except general weakening of human immunity by radiowaves, but it concerns all illness aimed at Humanity by the same cabal who shower us with vaccines, GMO, chemtrails, Rockefeller medicine, Big Pharma drugs etc. .
One example, Prof. i Cifre’s conjectural “association” of 5G with Covid-19 infectivity is debunked here:
In that note, I suggest some remedies to repair the damage that has been done with the substandard info.
There is more bunk of this sort peddled by the best of the anti-5G activists God knows why, because there are no proofs for what is being asserted. The public consumes the headline by Dr. Havas on US equivalent of i Cifre’s article without the question mark inserted by Havas for lack of confirmation by statistical analysis, just like i Cifre’s sensational headline is devoid of evidence. These are merdia methods. Correlation with fabricated data (incidence of Covid-19) is GIGO.
The supposed oxygen-starving effect of 60 GHz belongs to the same category of fakes. The best  “evidence” I could get from reputable activists is that Joe Imbriano said so.  Well, he also says our Planet is flat and there are no satllites in the sky, but I prefer a spherical Earth. In fact, a satellite 60 GHz signal would be so diluted at the Earth’s surface that it would make no difference to oxygen absorbability by humans.  For a ground antenna, the signal gets diluted a million-fold at 1000 m distance.
2. Evidence of radiowave impact on SARS CoV-2 virulence
What do we say in place of the junk and bunk on the covid sub-topic? Dr. Diana Wojtkowiak of Coalition “Poland Free of 5G” responds scientifically to the info crisis:
The topic might be too exotic to most people, so I provide Highlights in front of Her article:
  • Coronavirus activity relation to radiowaves, incl. 5G frequencies, has been in the open for over a decade, sponsored by the perpetrators of the Covid-19 “pandemic” and the global 5G roll-out. 
  • According to ample scientific literature, radio waves independently stimulate two signalling pathways in bio-cells, making SARS-CoV infect them more aggressively and virulently. A mobile communication carrier signal, modulated digitally or by amplitude modulation with acoustic frequencies, affects ranges which the carrier signal alone can’t influence. 
  • SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and possible successors exceed bio-weapon  requirements. A geographic area or a selected person may be targeted with strong radiowave field to invoke high virulence in a virus, resulting in high mortality in humans. The intensity of radio wave radiation determines virus aggressiveness.
  • We can pharmacologically affect virus-caused processes and we could also control the effect of radioowave radiation. A number of natural substance could temper SARS CoV-2 aggressiveness.
  • SARS-CoV protein increases the expression of an activator inhibitor that causes fibrosis and clots in small lung vessels, leading to lung damage. Micro-clots are probably crucial in the occurrence of respiratory failure. Evidently, we are dealing not with pneumonia, but disseminated intravascular coagulation (thrombosis).
  • With Dr. Diana Wojtkowiak’s expertise in torsion fields, this knowledge forms a scientific base for her charges to Poland’s Prosecutor General against the country’s fascist regime for collusion in the crime of genocide. She has 30 years’ theory and hands-on experience in molecular biology, medicine, electronics and advanced physics. A rare all-round civilian scientist in torsion fields, a domain reserved for world powers’ military and secret services, she has been banned from Polish parliament hearings on 5G legislation
Please disseminate on both issues.
.

PB: Dear Claire, Before you attack, read the thread, ask for clarifications. I alert about Prof. i Cifre’s article on covid – 5G relation. Your response is offensive, accusatory, divisive and apologetic on the problem you have co-created. Expedient answerability cannot absolve responsibility. Because 60 petitions went nowhere, we are not entitled to deceive the public to win them over. Your reaction is not constructive and morally wrong.

Junk & bunk on virus and 5G relation is harming the reputation of our movement. It is in the globalists’ crosshair on this very sub-issue, as we talk. Do as you preach and accept critique as part of diverse input and activist positions. Despite your claims, we have lost this battle, for our nonsense on 5G around covid. We have a chance to self clean before the shit hits Big Telecom’s fan. Otherwise the adversary scores a double with the public: discredit anti-5G and cover up bio-weapon schemes. I trust you will understand my point.
It is not about your talents, my ego, nor John’s tiptoeing, even though he privately admits I am right about i Cifre’s article. Dr. Wojtkowiak has pointed to loads of papers. Nobody invokes them in our movement that instead is fed hogwash. John indicated a few papers on the topic, none of them contained this sort of info, so I questioned the ref’s. You took it as my seeking more science papers. The pseudo-science does not prove what anti-5Gers claim regarding covid. Superiority of “evidence” so far provided by some activists is a myth. Widely cited flat-earther Joe Imbriano also hails.
You are an expert on writing for the public, I know how the public reads. Headline by Dr. Havas on US equivalent of i Cifre’s article is consumed without its question mark, just like i Cifre’s sensational headline is devoid of evidence. These are presstitute methods. You do believe you’re winning minds and hearts with deception you ostensibly fight. Correlation with fabricated data (incidence of Covid-19) is GIGO. You are winning, by rubbish. We will be imprisoned “smartly”, because ignorant activists peddle fabrications, and it doesn’t matter out of which motive.
You allege that I have attacked you. In fact, I emailed John who among other ref’s uncriticaslly promotes the junk, incl. your translation of i Cifre’s:
With Claire, you are helping the globalists discredit the movement and implement real wireless-steered bio-weapon. If you intend to keep your bulletin substandard and add to the disinfo, please unsubscribe me, John. I unsubscribed from Claire’s months ago for similar reason.
Pointing out a flaw and suggesting a remedy is not an attack. The thread is between me and John, copies to activists (incl, you, so it’s disingenious to allege a snipe). You also insinuate that  I want new papers to convince the satanists. I am protesting to improve PUBLIC education, the goal of our movement and of my blogs.
If you really are so answerable to Humnaity, it behooves you to identify bunk, regardless of its author and the narrative you adopted. I do seek to excel in the gifts I have, just as you do. My “narrative” changes with the process of discovery. If campaigners diverge from truth, I blow the whistle.
Please reply with clear head, without pontification, maternity complex nor condenscendence. I am well aware of your contribution to the Appeal and beyond, credits are due to you for your indisputable achievements. They carry an onus for you to show leadership and from the situation that arose find a solution appropraite for the movement and the common good.
I helped you get out of the crisis with “internationalists”. So please don’t make me an adversary because something hit your ego; it was not my intention and I apologize if I did it. With compassion I’m very sorry and concerned to see you in this state of spirit, but I trust you will overcome this crisis, too, and grow ever stronger out of it.
Awaiting apologies for your snap riposte,
Piotr Bein
PS. Did you find out if Wi-Fi at that school was 60 GHz?
.

On Sunday, June 7, 2020, 2:48:53 AM PDT, Claire Edwards: Dear Piotr, I retiterate.  60 petitions that went nowhere.  One Appeal a major success that has finally woken up the public.  And why?  Because it was more outspoken and more comprehensive, clearer, well-designed and “messaged” the public with an uplifting symbol.  While Arthur Firstenberg treats it as his personal fiefdom, surrounds himself with sycophants and allies himself with the very globalists behind the wireless technology cull of humanity, it was I who wrote countless articles last year to promote the Appeal, it was I who did interviews and videos and travelled around Europe (entirely at my own expense – I’ve never had a single cent from Arthur) to speak in different places to promote it.  And where was Arthur?  Practically invisible.  Not a single article, to my knowledge, and a couple or three minor audio interviews with DJs.  So who is more responsible for the success of the Appeal?

You say that we need more solid science.  I edited Martin Pall’s submission to the ICNIRP consultation on the revised guidelines.  Before I edited it, it was largely impenetrable.  When I’d finished editing it, it was crystal clear, and I added quotes (with permission from MP) from people who had suffered massively from wireless technology, making the document incredibly powerful.  So much so that ICNIRP had what you might call an institutional heart attack when they received it.  You can find the before and after versions attached.
Another of Martin Pall’s documents I kept hearing much-praised from all quarters: “Martin Pall’s 90-page document”.  Everyone seemed terribly impressed that it was 90 pages long.  My immediate thought was, “How would you expect any member of the public to read 90 pages of scientific mumbo-jumbo?”  When I was working at the UN as an editor, I was quite sure that instead of doing minimal edits, which was what we did, if they changed the system so that editors worked within and for substantive departments, I could reduce almost every document down to at least one quarter of its original length, thereby saving the organisation millions of dollars in translation costs and making those documents much more understandable.  It used to cost $1,500 dollars per page or $3.50 per word for translation and publication in all six UN languages.  Martin Pall’s 90-page document is, frankly, a total mess and needs a huge editing job, which would make it clear, the information accessible, and reduce it to at least half the length.  Any serious publication is copy-edited before it’s published.  You probably have not seen texts before and after editing so you probably don’t realise.  And in fact, no one really “gets” the importance of editing, just as no one outside the language field really “gets” the importance of linguistic accuracy.
You stick to your “solid science”.  We will stick to our campaigning.  John and I are the ones winning hearts and minds, not your science.  Scientists gathered in dark rooms to tell other scientists how dangerous all this is.  Scientific papers that are impenetrable to the public.  You really think we have time to wait until we reach 60K scientific papers and the evidence is even more overwhelming than it is already?  By that time most of us will be dead and the remainder sick and suffering, imprisoned in “smart” cities.  Or the whole planet will be dead.  All credit to the scientists for all their efforts to alert the public, but we, members of the public, can make this message understandable and spread it in the public domain.
Get real, Piotr.  This is not about proving the case through the science.  It doesn’t matter how much science you present to these crooks.  This is a conspiracy.  If you cannot see that, then i cannot help you.  The scientists, of all people, know that this is a conspiracy since they have been defunded, fired and even had their lives threatened for trying to alert the public.  John and I will win over the public by our methods and if you want to do something else, fine, but don’t undermine our work by sniping in the background.
I have never in my life been any kind of activist before, and to be honest, I would quit this whole scenario in an instant if I felt I could.  I am utterly sickened by the behaviour I see absolutely everywhere.  So much ego, selfishness, self-importance, greed, attacking other people, “I’m-so-much-better-than-you”, superiority, patronage, jealousy, etc.  It is frankly all so little boys’ world.
I never felt the need to assert any ownership of the Appeal.  I had no idea that it was necessary until Arthur handed it over to the globalist conspirators.  I don’t need credit for my work as I am not motivated by any base instinct for praise, recognition, success, prestige, sycophancy, rewards, money, or any of these repugnant behaviours that I repeatedly see other campaigners exhibit.  However, rather belatedly, I realise, now that I find myself under constant attack and constantly undermined (always by men, by the way), that I need to fight my corner.  I thought it was enough to be sincere, committed, dedicated and caring about this situation and to genuinely do everything i can to prevent this catastrophe.  But apparently, while the patriarchy persists, this is not enough for a woman to do.
I have expertise, Piotr, and it’s not in the scientific domain.  It’s in the communication domain, where i spent my entire working life.  I don’t need instructions from you or anyone else because I know what I’m doing.  This is my specialisation, where I spent 40 years of my life (and am still in that same domain doing this, even though I’m retired) and also – let me add this although i would not normally do so – where I was universally recognised for being excellent at my work!  I’m happy to accept anyone’s helpful inputs, but I’m no longer going to accept put-downs from sniping commentators who don’t share my skills and don’t have the wherewithal or respect for other people to even acknowledge my significant contribution.  Again, I don’t normally feel the need to assert myself or claim credit for my contribution, but I do so in response to attacks such as yours.
I have great respect for Dr. D and her work and would be delighted to promote getting it into the public domain but when i looked at it some months ago, it was not understandable.  As i don’t speak Polish, I am unable to help.  I did take a close look at it when you first raised it but realised that the English version was not of a standard to be understood.  Perhaps you have now improved it.  But what you don’t know is that written communication takes place differently in English as compared to other languages.  So it is not just a matter of translation – it is a matter of structure.  And if the structure does not conform to the expectations of an English-speaking audience, then it will gain no traction and not be understood.  The structure of written English is significantly different from what is expected in most other languages.  I used to teach this at the UN through my own, self-designed courses which, as I said earlier, were celebrated throughout the organisation and because of that I was invited to take them to six different countries.  I hold a master’s degree in intercultural competence.
I am not answerable to you, Piotr, or to any other campaigner who seeks to be better than other people or to control the narrative and how other campaigners do their work.  I am answerable to humanity as a whole, particularly the innocent children, and to nature and the planet.  I am not going to be deterred by the sniping criticisms of anyone because i am determined to get this job done in the best way I possibly can.  I’m not perfect but I will apply my experience and expertise to obtaining the best possible outcome.  What is going on is a crime against humanity and I intend to stop it.  Whenever I am attacked, I am reminded of why I am doing this by the pictures below.
crimes against humanity.png
I work alone, but i benefit constantly from the interactions I have with other people.  I could not do what I do without the support of, and inputs from, others.  I see this campaign as a huge tapestry.  Diverse people from many different countries and domains bring their life experience, compassion, skills, knowledge and perception to bear and we all build on and synthesize the inputs of others.  This is why I don’t feel the need to claim credit for my work – because i believe that we are alll working cooperatively to achieve the outcome we want.  And i don’t dismiss anyone’s input, of whatever size or nature.  I don’t think that the contribution of the layperson who just knocks on a few doors or tells a few family members or forwards a few Twitter messages is any less significant than anyone else’s.  What counts here is purity of intention, untainted by self-interest or ego (and if we find someone is tainting their actions with self-interest or ego, we are entitled to, and indeed required to call them out, as in the present case).  As soon as we start judging and evaluating as “less then” anyone else’s input, we undermine them and deter others from contributing.  I am not a materialist and ultimately, I believe that everything that is happening is not about weighing the facts at all, but about awakening humanity from its lazy complicity with lies and abuse to active participation in a movement promoting personal autonomy, personal sovereignty, truth, beauty and, most importantly, a redefinition of human relationships.  This is really all about the end of the old, patriarchal paradigm and the ushering in of a just and peaceful new paradigm more oriented towards feminine values.
Please don’t contact me again as I am not interested in negativity or ego.  I would be happy to remain in contact with Dr. D, whom I met and liked and respected in February 2019 and if I can be of any service to her, I would be happy to do so.
.

On Saturday, June 6, 2020 9:24 PM, Piotr Bein:

I know Pall’s paper intimately, read it a few times,, translated highlights into Polish. His work does not show any proven link covid-wireless. I questioned him at his lecture tour here, he has no clue about torsion fields nor that mechanisms other than his VGCC are at work. VGCC does not explain the SARS CoV-2 respiratory failure.
Dr. Wojtkowiak has shown that torsion fields govern radiowaces-covid relation. BTW, please in your bulletin show a link to her work right after the main heading or embedded into it, not at the end, to where majority of readers don’t reach. Ignoring torsion fields leads to nonsense like metal screening of EMFs by Panagopoulos. Screening EMF’s energy does nothing to its info content. Electrosensitivity might be remedied, but not carpet irradiation for virus trigger. Wojtkowiak has ascertained empirically that metal screening does not affect torsion beams.
I found no work by Panagopoulos Belyaev 2015 on virus – radiowave effect. Please provide a link since you are so sure. Also, please refer in your bulletin to the critique of Prof. i Cifre’s junk science:
BTW, he is one person, not multiple authors. Instead of debunking, you add Magda Havas’ to the crackpot parade. Like the other pseudo-scientists, she leaves her junk & bunk with a question mark for useful idiot consumption. Ideology has numbed down the minds of top anti-5G activists, I will have no part in it, just as I totally reject anthropogenic climate change, the base of predecessor massive PsyOp scare.
With Claire, you are helping the globalists discredit the movement and implement real wireless-steered bio-weapon. If you intend to keep your bulletin substandard and add to the disinfo, please unsubscribe me, John. I unsubscribed from Claire’s months ago for similar reason.
.
John Weigel: Piotr, You’ll find plenty of material if you just do a Google search for “Panagopoulos Belyaev 2015”.  The following paper is in collaboration with Martin Pall: Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health. There’s more on Google Scholar.

.

PB: John, Do you have the link to Belayaev, Panagopoulos et al 2015?

.

PB: John, Until we have a better process, it would suffice to comment on the suspect material in your introductions, lest the public would absorb it uncritically. Consensus might force acceptance of falsehood in a group setting. We should be able to assess facts and decide if we agree, and if not, what is the additional information at the base of personal opinion differences.
If we were to create a process for sifting info-junk off, a moderator, a few experts and access to discussion by different opinions and critiques would be required.
Claire, My email concerns the relation of wireless to SARS epidemics. There is very scanty solid info on this subject among copious material being distributed and quoted. The public learns rubbish  that is readily undermined by counter-propaganda (e.g. the establishment agit-piece that John includes in his collection), casting doubts also on the other aspects of our efforts to educate the public.
We need a strategized and more streamlined approach to selecting material with scientific oversight BEFORE  dissemination. Otherwise we play into the hands of the global crime sindicate. With your skills, you could oversee and coordinate such area. but arbitrary “rules” are out of place in such work.
I measure success by the number of users who give up their smartphone. I do not know the evidence of the successes you name. Could you please provide?
I am totally against basing our educatiuon efforts on junk science. We would be laughed at by professionals if you tried to prop up campaigns with Prof. i Cifre’s conjectural article. The posters you attach are in this category re. 5G’s role. Sentence on 60 GHz is patented hogwash. This frequency can’t possibly be modulated onto the carrier signal (max. about 30 GHz),and when beamed from satellites, it is diluted a milion-fold. Breathe easy… The globalist scam-demic is panic enough, we don’t need to spice it up and lose face in the process. Joe Imbriano is crack-pot, believes in flat Earth — do you?
.
Claire Edwards: Dear Piotr, Oh, dear!  Gosh, yes, we do need more solid info, don’t we?  It’s such a shame we can’t have 31 thousand and one studies.  31 thousand and two or even three or four would help us such a lot, wouldn’t they?   Do you think one or two more will finally tip the balance and ICNIRP and the ITU and WHO and governments and health authorities all over the world will throw up their hands in horror and suddenly say, “Oh, if only you’d told us sooner!  Let’s ban all this wireless junk and start protecting people’s health!”
What we need, Piotr, since governments and other redundant, corrupt and irrelevant “authorities” on this planet have been bought and paid for by the likes of the eugenicist Bill Gates et al., is propaganda that convinces the public that all of this is unsafe.  And with i Cifre, we are winning that battle.
Proponents of the idea that yet more of the same will suddenly change everything are living in cloud cuckoo land.  The last thing we need is the same strategies and material as have been used in the past.  What we need is the kind of fresh, alternative, out-of-the-box thinking that does not play by the rules set by the system but breaks all the rules and does the unexpected, completely out-manoeuvring the kind of plodding, unthinking obeisance to the system and its globalist controllers that we see self-replicating everywhere thanks to the ubiquitousness of stupidphones  The kind of thinking that comes up with a beautiful design of a bee – a representation of life and not death – as the symbol for an appeal, for example, and makes that appeal the first one out of 60 to get traction with the public.
  • We won the information war over the dangers of 5G.
  • We won the information war over the connection between 5G and the non-existent “coronavirus”.
  • Now let’s win the information war over the dangers of these vaccines.
Let’s not play by the system’s rules, Piotr, because it gets us nowhere.  Personally, I’m playing by mine and having lots of fun.
.
On Monday, June 1, 2020 6:53 PM, Piotr Bein:
Dear John
Thanks for compiling the Updates. Inadvertently, info-junk is distributed along with it, for example, the article by Professor Payeras i Cifre on supposed relationship between 5G and Covid-19, contains the following flaws, in my opinion.
– A scientific study of a relationship to “incidence of infections”, an entity based on error-crippled diagnostic test, and fraudulent and arbitrary standards (vastly varying between countries, cities and hospitals) can’t produce meaningful results.
– A hypothesized “direct correlation” is likely spurious, and the “relationship” a conjecture, unless derived with statistical rigour. One may as well hypothesize urban development, noise and air pollution in the cause-effect relation and “prove” the hypotheses with respective maps.
– Fixation on 5G is self-deceit, as SARS viruses are triggered/enhanced by frequencies emitted by earlier generations featuring different bands and spectrums, incl. sound frequencies and those modulated onto the carrier signal — according to Dr. Wojtkowiak and ref. 10 she cites in: VIRAL Dr. Diana Wojtkowiak: The link between the SARS CoV-2 pandemic and the 5G network. To Poland’s Public Prosecutor General. If I understan, the virus trigger could come via radio and TV, Dr. Diana?
– The article’s No. 1 chart: the most infected countries, annotated that they all receive 5G satellite signals. What countries with negligible infection incidence receive such signals? Why should it be 5G when we know that world powers can emit torsion field signals from Space influencing life-steering flow of info, incl. capability to kill and make ill (or heal and strenghten).
– Comparing jurisdictions on a given date is subject to errors due to variations in factors such as number of tests/diagnoses administered, stage of epidemic (onset, peak, decline), effect of natural torsion fields that vary across the Earth’s surface at a given time.
– Differences across borders may be due to diagnostic testing policy, population age distribution, and mandatory vaccination regime, for example.
– Chart No. 4 — San Marino (pop. 33k) should be compared with other cities and towns, not with whole countries. Sample size affects precision of results, while social differences such as averaged out densities of 5G infrastructure and population skew the results.
– Chart No. 5 — Comparison of Italian cities includes only 5G by Vodaphone.
– Chart No. 13 — Equipped with 5G or not, military bases are most vulnerable to epidemics, beside hospitals, schools, prisons, stadiums and big conferences.
– And so on…
Biased and sub-standard info enjoys undeserved respect of some anti-5G’ers, contributing to public disinfo and harming the movement by feeding propaganda against us, while valuable solid info and opinions are ignored in our ranks.
We should select material for translations and dissemination judiciously, with some scientific oversight. I discussed it with Claire Edwards months ago, but nothing is happening.
What are we going to do about this problem?
.
On Friday, June 5, 2020, 7:17:54 AM PDT, John Weigel:
Ladies and Gentlemen,
 In a week when Microsoft’s Bill Gates announced the need for a world government and a universal vaccine passport  it requires a reassessment of Gates’ influence. If a person needs advice on technology, Gates is the ultimate source of relevant information. What gives Gates the authority to call for changes that impact everyone on the planet? If you have computer problems, you call a computer expert. When you need a plumber, you call a plumber. When it comes to world affairs, Gates is a plumber and yet Robert Kennedy, Jr. claims Bill Gates owns the World Health Organization.
 By contrast, an anonymous Vodaphone executive claims the vaccine promoted by Gates is a method for tracking and tracing individuals by inclusion of chemicals while, the speaker claims, Gates  “is innovating for the demise of humanity”. The question is who to believe. The Beforeitsnews website has been contacted for verification of the provenance of the audio.
 However, an article written by an individual in Ireland who wishes to remain anonymous reiterates what the speaker in the audio claims regarding Wuhan, Milan and the Princess Cruise liners. (Google Drive link attached.)
 In the face of emerging evidence of a link between Covid-19 and 5G technology from Belayaev, Panagopoulos et al in 2015 to Bartomeu & Cifre, the media persists in questioning the link as “conspiracy theorists” (See link below regarding attacks on technicians in the U.K.).
 The fact remains, both 5G and Covid-19 appeared at approximately the same time in the same places. Both will have a profound effect on humanity.

By piotrbein

https://piotrbein.net/about-me-o-mnie/