Grassroots anti-5G under globalist assault

Grassroots anti-5G under globalist assault

Piotr Bein, 10.9.2020

Contents

Foreword

Conclusions

Agents, useful ignorants and bullying

Arthur Firstenberg’s hijack and crassitude

The Appeal’s shortcomings score for globalists

Implications for our campaigning

S5GI press release for January 25 Global Day of 5G Protest

Claire Edwards’ discoveries

Joe St Clair — useful ignorant or au fait globalist?

Genocidal globalist agenda

“Attorney” Reza Ganjavi gate-keeper

Tanja Rebel — who she is not

Roots and operations of deceptive globalist agenda

For example Rising Up! and Extinction Rebellion

How it all fits together

Epilogue

See also

Appendix 1. Explanations by Nicolya Christi

Appendix 2. Draft retracted on August 6, 2020

Foreword

In a conflict following a hijack of the Appeal Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (the Appeal) a number of persons associated with the Stop 5G International (S5GI) have been accused of facilitating, consciously or not, globalist infiltration of the grassroot movement against 5G and wireless technology in general.  Upon examination, the allegations turned out to be biased against Nicolya Christi who in her rebuttal admits a misjudgement of the globalist initiatives that caught her interest several years ago.

A revision is also due following the globalist scam of the “covid” plandemic, specifically the relation between “covid” and wireless tech. It was another test to probe S5GI activist attitudes and behaviour that, according to their declarations, are pro publico bono. Unfortunately, the test also stains S5GI repute.

I had to rely on the conflicted parties’ willingness to counter critiques — an ideal that not always worked. Nevertheless, my apologies that it took so long to at least partly clarify.

On August 6, 2020, following a series of explanations by Nicloya to me personally and to a group that discussed the conflict, I have retracted the draft containing allegations against her, and placed it below as Appendix 2 for documentation purpose.

Other allegations stand, based on information some of the accused have provided themselves in group discussions. This case consumed disproportionate amount of time and energy on all sides relative to the result: no confluence of opinions and egos against the global genocidal cabal. Nicolya wrote me privately in the end:

Gratitude for all you are doing to bring clarity not just to this situation but in general in those threads. Seems that the topics covered are so multi-layered and multifaceted that much misunderstanding abounds. Such a shame people cannot communicate in the spirit of respectful enquiry with a view to mutually supporting each other to comprehend the core realities of the full spectrum of all that is spoken of in the threads. Why people need to ‘attack’ each other is the biggest shame given everyone is working on the same ’side’ as it were. So many brilliant minds in the threads but when pitted against each other dilute the major impact that could be achieved if they were all working together.

Misunderstandings do arise between passionate people, as some of us know from own experience. I hope that some day we will all reconcile and work together for Humanity’s benefit, against the globalists.

Conclusions

Clarification of ideological positions is necessary to keep the anti-5G grassroots mentally healthy, aware of possible infiltration and corruption, and resistant to de-railiong or capture to globalist agenda.

Some of the anti-5G grassroot independents don’t wish the Appeal Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (the Appeal) be used by dubious orgs  to approach local, national nor quasi-world governments. These entities are in bed with, or could readily be corrupted by the globalists whose agenda the activists chose to support. Time is out and it’s a wrong approach, just as emphasis on health effects is, without talking loudest about the 5G enslavement weapon: total control over Humanity towards NWO, with intermediate phases — Depopulation, Cyborgization, Transhumanism.

From lessons of the past year, grassroot groups should be watchful of cooption and subjugation attempts by the globalists. As important, they should revise strategy and tactics to adjust activities to newly discovered and emerging conditions and threats. It’s clear that we should remain in distributed, dispersed independent structures for robustness and diversity — the mimic of resilient natural ecosystems, the Maker’s Creation.

Grassroot independent groups and citizens are encouraged to closely watch the potentially controlled orgs who ostensibly declare anti-5G stance. Should you discover that their agitation, propaganda and actions indicate corruption of Humanity’s will, expose them. Disseminate your findings to warn and alert others, and when necessary withdraw from activity under dubious auspices.

On a positive side, the episode should stimulate the grassroots to revise current strategy and tactics, with a view on devising a more effective course.  Persons deemed “opposition” agents have many talents and there would be ample room to use those abilities and skills for the Common Good, once the muddy waters clarify.

Agents, useful ignorants and bullying

In e-wrestling between the exposers and the accused referred to below, the latter ones object to the former’s vocabulary. Here is a legal definition of agent: someone or something that acts or exerts power : a moving force in achieving some result. Agents are not necessarily nefarious; the concept of an agent of influence is more relevant. Such person is a useful ignorant when he or she advances an interest harmful to Humanity, while remaining unaware about it. Some of the persons react to critique as if they were under direct or indirect control by the globalist interests or powers. I call politruks the higher-level agents steering lower-level agents (from Soviet and Comintern politicheskiy rukovoditel = political handler).

In non-government and front organisations, consciousness of the leaders determines the character of the group, as ideologically non-compliant members resign or are purged. The more likely are deliberate conscious acts under direct control by politruks, the more removed a group is from genuine grassroots. The critiqued ones blame their victims, the exposers, in a self-defence reaction. Displacing own fault onto the victim intimidates the critic and absolves the offender from examining their own behaviour. Victimisation may induce fear in the victim, even infecting the community.

Oppressor’s attack fabricates own victimhood to justify the abuse and to manipulate the audience, perhaps even as a coping strategy and attention gainer. Abuser’s self-victimhood claims that the abuse was justified by the victim’s reprehensible behavior. Enter dehumanization (treating others as impaired mentally, malicious etc., thus scocial outliers) and diverting attention away from own abusive acts. The abuser counts on gaining and maintaining power and control over another person, but the act in itself serves to reinforce/enlarge abuser’s power in a group.

Abusers usually play victims to justify to themselves the cognitive dissonance between self-awareness and the way they treat others. In turn, victimhood expressed outwards attempts to deflect/evade negative opinion/condemnation from the audience. Unending threats of legal action serve to re-inforce the victimization effect both in- and out-wardly. A normal, honest person doesn’t need to do that in self-defense. A letter from an attorney  usually takes care of real offenders. Skilful attorneys can get the cost reimbursed by the offender.

I’ve been privy to victimisation of Claire Edwards, after her intellectual property (half of the Appeal) has been stolen and used by a group she would not approve of morally. She was broken down at the time, didn’t wish to deal with it anymore and rejected my offer to publish her discovery and e-conversations with her adversaries. Claire and others may have experienced byllying, a personal response under conditions of social power imbalance to the  abuser’s benefit. Hostile intent and repetition over a period would also point to bullying. It is asserted in this case psychologically/emotionally by repeated verbal harassment and threats.

Some of our bullies seem arrogant and narcissistic — again, the abuser empowers himself by demeaning the victim. Some of them do it either to “reverse” being bullied by others, to act out an inflated fragile ego, or in reaction to criticism or perceived disrespect because they think too highly of themselves. Other risk factors in a potential abuser that might apply (some evidence in discussions) include anger propensity, addiction to aggressivity, misjudging others’ actions as hostile, and self-image preservation — occuring separately or jointly. Personality disorders may also contribute.

Each personal trait alone is sufficient (for me) to reject each person, their org and initiatives, however fine they might appear to be. Unless they markedly improve, they are redundant, superfluous and don’t add value to the grassroots. When a decisive monumental course of collective action is needed to arrest the 5G roll-out, some of them obstructively argue or mince words, as if they didn’t know that 5G is a weapon, Greta is a conscious fake and a globalist plant, and anthropogenic climate change and “covid” plandemic are patented hoaxes by massive psy-op all over the world, to implement globalist NWO agenda.

From own encounters with bullies, I decided not to yield but to restore some balance of social power between the parties. I only regret I’ve not reacted earlier to this  obviously globalist assault, but hope others can benefit from examining the case for early detection and prevention in their own activism.

Arthur Firstenberg’s hijack and crassitude

Co-creator of famous Appeal Stop 5G on Earth and in Space, Claire Edwards has alarmed that her colleague and co-author on that project, Arthur Firstenberg has hijacked it and transferred to a group serving globalist agenda. Arthur may have committed two transgressions of law and ethical conduct:

  • He has effectively stolen Claire Edwards intellectual property — about half the contribution to the Appeal — and is disposing of it without her consent.
  • He disposed of the signatories’ endorsement of anti-5G cause — in effect an anti-globalist ideal — by making the document available to apparently same cause but in the hands of people with dubious propensity to globalist agenda.

Using ca. 200k signatory e-addresses he collected, Arthur keeps emailing 5G news out, some of them without stating the source properly. This opens an additional door to globalist agent provocateurs, not to mention Arthur’s  impudence of ignoring requests by signatories to have their signatures and e-addresses removed from his database. I and a few people I know kept receiving his mailouts after requesting repeatedly to be removed as signatories.

Arthur is key to this scandalous assault on grassroots. With his submission of the Appeal without signatories’ permission, globalists would be able to use it to legitimise their activity on the 5G front, with a potential to capture/derail/deflate independent national and local movements for ultimate globalist advantage. On August 1, 2020, Arthur requested that I vindicate him:

The 5G Space Appeal was not “hijacked” nor given nor shared with anyone. Not anyone, at any time. I have been working on these issues for 40 years and I have led my organization for 24 years, and I have never, in 24 years, shared anyone’s personal information or email addresses with anyone. I am only the caretaker of the Appeal, not its owner, and I take that responsibility seriously. There were four co-authors and many other contributors to the Appeal, not just Claire and me. All email addresses and personal information of the signatories are kept in a private database that is not accessible to anyone except me. Stop 5G International does not have it, has never had it, will never have it. I cooperated with Stop 5G International for a short while but never shared the database with them. They have never requested such a thing. A few people have from time to time requested that I share the email list of signatories from their own country, and I have always refused such a request. 
I parted company with Stop 5G International for two reasons: (1) most members of Stop 5G International own and use cell phones, and (2) many or most members of Stop 5G International believe in conspiracy theories, such as also you, Piotr, believe in, and accuse innocent people of, including Nicolya and me. 

A quantum physicist by education, referring to a propagandist entry on RationalWiki as his source, he rejects torsion field science. In a discussion among scientists Arthur-ignorant arrogantly opinions“Torsion fields” are a complete and utter hoax. Arthur’s crasstitude mixed with chutzpah surfaced when he reacted to my critique in group discussion: I recommend all of you permanently block Piotr’s emails, as I am about to do. He is nothing but a hateful, delusionary, racist piece of trash. My only “racist” references in discussions he witnessed were to Jew bankster cabal of global control and to Zionist villainy in Shoah and the broader Holocaust. Some people are well indoctrinated by the globalists; they already work for the globalists by espousing this sort of propaganda. They are desirables slated for control by the globalists.

On anthropogenic climate change consipracy, Arthur quotes  politically correct sources that keep silent on falsification of climate data by IPCC and lack of positive proof for a correlation of atmospheric CO2 concentration with temperature. Just like his “anti-racist” slur is compliant with subduing Humanity to the bankster agenda, Arthur’s cognitive dissonace is congruent with climate ideology of some of the S5GI people and too many in the grassroots.

Such mentality of some leaders and grassroot rank and file impede campaigns against the globalist  perpetrators of both climate change and 5G deceptions. Climate change agenda is an excuse and pretext for “smart” things in pushing 5G. Without explicit debunking of climate change hoax and fraud, no self-appointed activist against 5G  is credible at best, and a globalist agent, conscious or not, at worst.

The Appeal is now in self-appointed S5GI activists’ hands. Tanja Rebel, Kate Kheel and Pernille Schriver figure as contacts on the org’s press release below. There may be other persons in the org and related or collaborating groups, such as Stop5G in Zuckerberg’s fb outlet of corporate mass control, censorship and manipulation by the ruling cabal aka military-industrial-government complex.

The Appeal’s shortcomings score for globalists

Apart from the moral flaws if its caretakers, the Appeal under present custody also needs improvement to become a more effective campaigning tool. As is, the Appeal could mentally trap inexpert users, e.g. Big Telecom could show off an “effort” to soften the technology by reducing its bio-impact, but  retain full capability in the other aspects: mass control, connection to Artficial Intelligence and migration to Cyborgisation of Humankind..
The Appeal is not suitable for grassroots campaign and education purposes as it,
  • Reflects only the admin/contributors’ mindset (e.g. Arthur Firstenberg’s scientific/ideological bias above).
  • Presumes for itself more importance and usefullness to national/local groups than it can offer. Some groups command political, legal and technical expertise that would be more advanced for public education and submissions to authorities.
  • Is not being updated fast enough, e.g. it talked about 20k satellites when officially the number more than doubled. It does not follow the deployment of stratospheric drones and baloons for 5G, an essentiall supplement to the satellite hordes.
  • Contains inaccurate and incomplete info about wireless and its bio-effects. Not-so-expert groups would uncritically copy and propagate it.
  • Misses the other aspects of 5G and later generations: mass control, selective cohort/individual target weapon, transhumanism… These are no less important long-term than health effects.
With these shortcomings, the Appeal fell into the hands of irresponsible people clamouring for control via S5GI. Why would grassroots need a central org like S5GI? Even if they accepted some steering, the self-appointed team at S5GI does not have the necessary cross-domain expertise. Ideological confusion and fanaticism coupled with naivete and defective moral compass are prominent among some of them. Morality is of special concern, as immoral people are easier manipulable by the powers that should not be.
S5GI people are not capable of strategic direction to local groups, nor technical expertise necessary to understand the technology before it could be stopped. In e-discussions with experts present, S5GI activists and associates proved they can be arrogant, offensive and plain stupid when facing new knowledge: Arthur Firstenberg denied that anthopogenic climate change is a fraud, but maintained that torsion field theory is definitely a hoax, according to his “source”, RationalWiki. At the time of the “covid” plandemic, Tanja Rebel ignores serious scientific evidence (from the establishment research itself!) on enhancement with radiowaves of SARS virulence and waking the virus up from latency.
Some people in S5GI have an authoritarian tendency. A lordly “teacher”, Tanja adresses” boys and girls” insolently in a discussion: it should be up to me and anyone else to believe what they want to believe and do what they want to do. I replied: You dictate whatever you fancy. If you feel you have the right to do so, me too has a right to criticize and demand corrections [from a pro publico bono group].
Based on the evidence S5GI activists leave behind when forced to engage in public discussion, it will be clear below that morality among some of them, as well as sensitivity and responsiveness to critique need improvement. Who needs such orgs, an ideal setup for the globalists?

Implications for our campaigning

This is also an opportune time to examine grassroots strategy and tactics in light of a rather meagre progress. Many activists call to put differences aside and unite against common adversary. I asked: To do what? but S5GI people do not answer. Calls for unity are understandable, but now is also a convenient moment for globalists to infiltrate/capture grassroots. The S5GI org and the quality of some of its people open the door to infiltration and capture. Past year has shown that,
  • Too many grassroots members and leadears are still unaware of the globalist agenda and its real perpetrators (as opposed to those being falsely pointed out), and/or perceive the issues according to globalist propaganda, e.g. climate change and “covid” relation to wireless.
  • 5G’s non-health issues are not prominent in local group campaigns, as the public is poorly educated and the leading activists fear being ridiculed by the ranks and file and by the wireless lobby and corporate media.
  • ICNIRP, a private club created by the wireless lobby, and other bodies influenced or under military-industrial complex’s control (WHO, IARC…) act under a covert agenda in conflict with Humanity’s good, refusing to tighten safe limits for RF irradiation. In former Soviet block, standards are being relaxed a 100-fold to match those in the Western world.
  • Focus on 5G rather than on all wireless contributors to the irradiation “soup” skews activist and public attention onto the lobby’s “safe” limits for 1G thru 5G technologies.
  • Governments at all levels largely don’t care about public protests, expert conferences and appeals, nor submissions to hearings etc.
  • School and medical boards could not care less that students, patients, and staff are constattly exposed to Wi-Fi radiation, as long as their hides are covered by federal/state emission standards.
  • Seemingly non-globalist states like Russian Federation show their true colours, by declaring support for 5G roll-out and AI. Despite national opposition, Putin has by presidential decree declared green light for 5G, beside gross relaxation of wireless safety limits.
  • Big Telecom propaganda neutralises our public education efforts. At the same time, most users of wireless become addicted to their gadgets and the new “lifestyle”.
  • Pseudo-scientific junk and misleading bunk are increasingly and indiscriminately peddled by ignorant grassroot members because the rubbish info fits our anti-wireless agenda.
  • Putin’s dictatorial moves on AI, 5G and worsening wireless “safety” limits   also proves that both “sides” of the deceptive “dialectic” are on the same globalist page, as were communist vs. capitalist “blocks”, both controlled by the Bankster Power Cabal.

To counter shortcomings like those above, a strategic importance assume education and constant awareness of:

  • the ubiquitous Bankster Cabal control to the point of total spectrum dominance in implementing NWO, and
  • their lackeys at all government levels and international and national political, social, financial and economic institutions.

To develop and implement a grassroot strategy for more effective activism in response to political, social and technical dynamics in the wireless and related domains (e.g. “covid” at present), improvements are necessary in face of grave genocidal/de-humanizing  threat that becomes increasingly obvious and imminent from the Bankster Cabal.

Take information verification for our dissemination, for example. An e-platform could help share key information for activist awareness and public education material. A forum of our technical, legal etc. specialists could discuss and vet the material, before we pass it on to the public and the officials, thus minimising the chance of disseminating junk and bunk. Based on local experience, approaches that work and technical submissions to hearings and legislators, groups and individuals could peruse the material according to their needs.

Groups on FB and other social network platforms do not fill the bill. They are oulets of info-tech’s mass surveillance, manipulation, censorship and data harvesting. They attract disinfo and trolls. Moderators may mow down or purge whom they choose to, and may lack expertise to assess posted material.

A few moderators and a forum on a dedicated webasite could assemble ideas and transform them into improved ways for our activism.

We should also keep in mind that the internet could be closed down. Rather than centralised organisation schemes and communications outside of our control, we need resilient, dispersed structure: higly educated, self-directed grassroots locally diversified and independent of each other.

The globalist bullies of Reclaim the Power have infiltrated UK anti fracking protests, and later morphed, together with like Climate Camp, into Extinction Rebellion. A grassroots member warns of actions led by those people, as due to social media publicity, the groups caused intense police coverage at anti-fracking eventsThe courts used those media posts as evidence that the ENTIRE anti-fracking movement intends to commit acts of domestic terrorism. The person advises:

The only way to “train” for activism is to get out to a camp or event of your choosing and just DO IT. Remain completely autonomous in your actions and NEVER let anyone tell you what to believe or do. Trust your gut feelings at all times. Never give your real name or address, email or phone number to anyone until you are completely sure about them.

Real activism avoids breaking the law or at least, avoids being caught doing so. Avoid telling anyone of your plans. Civil disobedience or rebellion is unashamed and indefensible sabotage by large numbers of people. Do not attend such events in public places where facial recognition or surveillance on a huge scale operates.

S5GI press release for January 25 Global Day of 5G Protest

In plain view, the supposed grassroot org is exploiting the half-stolen Appeal in the name of world’s anti-5G activism:

S5GI reps, one of them being a veteran of XR, announce delivery of the Appeal to national and covert world government branches: EU, UN, WHO. The latter ones are infamous for unquestionably pushing ICNIRP fake standards of wireless safety. Both groups of institutions keep us “thinking globally” but acting empowered only to a limited degree and only locally, while tramping on our basic rights at both levels, with barely a few current national and local exceptions.

What does S5GI do, aspiring to custody of another Global Day of 5G protest? Nothing revolutionary, more of the same that has failed us to date, a status quo that maintains globalist and 5G perpetrator agenda despite mass public protests. I have participated with grassroots in Poland to stop pro-5G legislation. Such efforts are futile, e.g. deputies and senators admit privately to reporters they know of the threats to health but would vote for 5G laws anyway. And they did; Poland has 100 times worse safety limits for radio wave irradiation than under Communism!

Others around the world erxperience similar obstacles. Given that, an energetic change of strategy is in order, away from reliance on mass public appeals, letters from scientists and emphasis on the health and life effects, while the perpetrator cabal remains fuzzily defined at best, and the grassroots skip weaponization of radio waves and mass control issues for fear of public disapproval and media ridicule.

Claire Edwards’ discoveries

Following her gradual discoveries in the 4th quarter of 2019, Claire Edwards’ public exposure of the globalist connection began with a post on a marginal blog. Some graphics from Claire’s alert is clearer after reading that post. Key to Claire’s allegations were findings on globalists’ Club of Rome, Club of Budapest and WorldShift initiative. The subject is a bit complex, so if you need to, you will find more in the material further on.

In subsequent discussions during the “covid”plandemic, Claire found more evidence supporting her suspicions. In both cases, alerting on Nicolya Christi’s alleged connections to these orgs and people turned out to be mistaken, based on her final submission for this article. I keep the graphics intact, though, for evidence of what Nicolya rebutted.

laszlo

christi

institute

global

In the second round of allegations, Claire documented Nicolya’s alleged association with Barbara Marx Hubbard,, along with conjectural evidence of her part in globalist WorldShift, and more material on the said globalist initiatives, interspersed with a social media post on Nicloya’s book and a note on her, its author. One might wrongly conclude that her book was among WorldShift activities. Claire also suspected continuation of Nicolya’s association with S5GI as she found credits to her in S5GI’s newer video production, Nicolya rebutted this allegation, too: [discussion] Is this Stop 5G International?

On August 5, 2020, following a series of explanations to email discussion circle, Nicolya  summarised her position (Appendix 1). At its face value, the summary vindicates her, but an item remained unclear, as Nicloya did not wish to rebuke this accusation by Claire:  I wonder how came it, then, that you invited a complete stranger, Joe St Clair, to moderate your first conference call on 5G on 13 June 2019!  What a coincidence! On August 22, 2020, Nicolya explained to me privately this point, too. She believes in JStC’s ignorant innocence. Without his permission to use his name — a strange circumstance for the public figure he is,she was reluctant to name him. .

Despite JStC’s apparent stance against 5G, presumed innocence of this UK Director of the World Sustainable Development Forum is also under a question mark, as I show next. Having found the hard way her mistakes by gullibly trusting people attached to the globalist agenda, Nicolya should have critically examined this figure. Asked about it on August 22,2020, she replied she trusts people on the face value of their words, and lacks formal education and knowledge that would allow her to discern. I deem her vindication fulfilled on the face value of her explanations.

Two items in Claire’s second round contain material on Arthur Firstenberg’s exploitation of the Appeal for globalist WorldShift purpose. Arthur denies any wrongdoing but is evasive on the facts of taking control of the Appeal without co-author Claire’s and the signatories’ consent, and handing it to S5GI.

Joe St Clair — useful ignorant or au fait globalist?

JStC opinions on “covid” to 5G relation and lays out his rescue-the-world ideology:

  • [2016] Joe St. Clair – Club of Budapest and Ervin Laszlo — Joe St. Clair, Global Director, Club of Budapest; Executive Director, Laszlo Institute of New Paradigm Research, Author, International Management Consultant… international meeting for “The New Paradigm in Physics” hosted by Ervin Laszlo

In both interviews JStC seems naive and ignorant: he has no clue about the “pandemic”  hoax&fraud,  doesn’t know of Sun-driven climate change, nor of absence of 60 GHz in 5G, nor of triggering enhanced coronaviruses by radiowavesbelow any 5G carrier frequencies. His campaigning on the two latter points adds to the junk&bunk material peddled indiscriminately and mindlessly by the anti-5G movement:

Perhaps he “intuits” rather than examines someone else’s apparent ideals and goals. Critical study also requires basic knowledge of sciences and the global oppressive system, which JStC does not display. This presumed shortcoming could explain his gullibility at the time he was attracted to globalist initiatives. However, after sufficient time to revise one’s views, JStC failed to renounce the globalist agenda rooted in fraud&hoax of “climate change” and “covid”, both of which he still believed in at the time of the above interviews.

It does not matter in effect, if JStC is an innocent useful dupe or the globalists’ conscient collaborator. The Reader will assess whether UK national director of the World Sustainable Development Forum programme is a globalist post or not. Within that global agenda, a non-elected body UK Stakeholders for Sustainable Development (UKSSD) pushes for the globalist agenda on the pretext of “covid” deception on top of over-exploited climate” fraud: We believe the Sustainable Development Goals can create a socially just and green recovery from the Covid19 pandemic.  

In both world-wide frauds, non-elect UKSSD provides guidance to local governments. The new direction for rebuilding post-plandemic communities includes demolition of covid-infected structures. Dissident Deborah Tavares on IsraeliNewsLive puts this UK plan into wider globalist context, as Claire Edwards does in exposing globalist hijack of 5G grassroots.

Genocidal globalist agenda

Good two weeks before 25.1.2020 global day of 5G protest, Claire alerted: Stop 5G International hijacked. Under legal threats and still stigmatised by the hijack of the Appeal — her hard work and idealist contribution to our common cause, as well as by vain efforts to clarify with S5IG and related people, she writes cryptically:

Arthur Firstenberg has chosen to associate the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space with a dubious self-appointed group, stop5ginternational, which was infiltrated by someone closely associated with various people at the very top of the Club of Rome/Agenda 21/2030/”sustainable development” movement, which believes in top-down control of people and resources, and depopulation. This is contrary to the aims of the stop 5G movement.

On 19.1.2020, Claire divulges the mysterious person at S5GI — alleged WorldShift  leader Nicolya Christi. The movement carried out socio-engineering tasks of the Club of Budapest. Club of Madrid is its political (politruk) counterpart, and both stem from the Club of Rome. S5GI was established by people connected to WorldShift, according to Claire, but Nicolya’s response to Claire’s allegations (Appendix 1) would vindicate her.

Claire explains WorldShift agenda in email exchange with S5GI and national activists. She assembles anti-human statements by so-called environmentalists, who support Greta’s psy-op and fraudulent climate change narrative:

  • Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.”  – John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal
  • Humans on the Earth behave in some ways like a pathogenic micro-organism, or like the cells of a tumor.” – Sir James Lovelock, Healing Gaia
  • The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.” – Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
  • A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to  the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.” – ProfPaul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb [he was the main promoter of the eugenics agenda of the Club of Rome]
  • I don’t claim to have any special interest in natural history, but as a boy I was made aware of the annual fluctuations in the number of game animals and the need to adjust the cull to the size of the surplus population.” – Prince Philip, preface of Down to Earth
  • A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.” – United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment
  • A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” – Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor
  • “… the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion.” – Club of Rome, Goals for Mankind
  • One America burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes. This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population,we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.” – Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier
  • If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” – Prince Philip, Duke of  Edinburgh, patron of the World Wildlife Fund
  • I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems.” – John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal
  • The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing.” – Christopher Manes, Earth First!
  • The extinction of Homo Sapiens would mean survival  for millions, if not billions, of Earth-dwelling species. Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on Earth – social and environmental.” – Ingrid Newkirk, former President of PETA
  • Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” – David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club
  • Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition.” – Peter Singer, founder of Animal Rights

Claire reproduces WorldShift 20 Declaration:

  • “It is the responsibility of the people to choose leadership that is knowledgeable and wise
  • We base ourselves on the Club of Rome Limits to Growth in 1972
  • “We need to replace the obsolete notions of nation-states
  • We need a “whole-system shift
  • “The human community needs comprehensive structural reform
  • “We need to leave everything we know behind in order to get to where we need to go.”
  • A systemic thorough reinvention of every aspect of humanity
  • “We are at a point in time when the spiritual dimension must become paramount in issues of decision making.”
  • “All states should establish an office for the specific fulfillment of the Millennium Development Goals” [later morphed into Agenda 21/2030]
  • Capital must be protected as other property rights”
  • A new bottom line must be established which incorporates the well-being of the environment and of people as part of the social bargain of society as a limited liability entity.”
  • “We must implement a proper valuation of the natural world independent of human interests”
  • “National sovereignty must be balanced with universal norms and values.”
  • “The human future and financial markets must be sustainable”
  • We need a “Global Environment Economy”
  • “We must … partner one another through the greatest social transformation ever known.”

In short, complete revolution and destruction of existing order: the family, society, humanity, and national states and sovereignty. Anybody of normal morale would be shocked and feeling downtrodden when accused, as Nicloya was, of association with this anti-God cesspool.

“Attorney” Reza Ganjavi gate-keeper

Reza Ganjavi self-declares a very non-litigious approach. He goes out of his way to avoid litigation and find peaceful solutions. He has assisted many friends with legal related topics, and they achieved excellent results. His experience includes family history in law and numerous personal litigation cases. Reza stresses that he is not a certified attorney.

Despite the credentials, Reza proved to be a dictator on FB, delusional about other people’s “delusions” which he fabricates on the go with verbal abuse. He shoots “legal” threats from the hip. He emailed me on behalf of an unnamed  friend shortly after publication of Claire’s findings on my blog. He insisted on a phone or skype conversation. I preferred written exchange, as he mentioned legal nature of his intervention. His attempt ended up in an unproductive, abusive  tantrum.

His self-advertisaing and offer of legal help “to friends” is a disaster, counterproductive to what he declares he seeks. I found that also with other people Reza tends to explode in a harassing, abusive, and insulting way when he does not get what he wants. Reza reacted so to Bruce Cain quoted on my blog. Bruce elaborates his grievance against Reza, the new admin of FB Stop5G Group, after previous admin(s) and moderators have been summarily purged on 27.9.2019, allegedly for reasons of Bruce’s libellous behaviour regarding Reza.

Bruce’s account of the conflict indicates lavatory bullying by “bulldozer” Reza, FB group admin or moderator at the time. I have requested from Reza copies of the alleged postings. Reza has not provided them to date. Whose civil/legal standard is it?

Beside abusive pressure on Bruce, Reza also displayed his bullying tactics with legal threats.  It looks like he tried to create a power imbalance, a situation absolving him from duty to provide evidence to substantiate his charges about Bruce’s alleged libels. Reza displayed similar tactics when faced with my refusal to delete what he deems an unlawful publication. Reza should know that his activism pro publico bono exposes him to scrutiny and criticism.

Mark Steele, UK prominent exposer of radiowave weaponisation, put Reza in his place regarding another “legal” threat:

Your efforts and threats should be focused at those deploying the 5G LED weapon surely and not at those who have rumbled the hidden hand of control and disempowerment. Can we firstly agree that 5G is a weapons system.  For those that have difficulty with that, then your ignorance will not help the 5G movement going forward.

Secondly can we also agree that C02 and the UN – EU push for dangerous uninsurable untested technologies harmful to the environment to mitigate the fake C02 agenda that include 5G weaponry are deployed as a covert plan to commit genocide on the people.

For those that can’t agree to the technicalities and published uncontested science that supports the above please leave the Anti 5G movement to those that understand it and the evil plan to deploy it.

Reza is one of those who would rather praise brainless protect-the-climate campaigning than educate the public about this bankster fraud. I clicked fb link in Reza’s signature block, and got this nonsense:

reza klima
Rubbish aside that radiowaves markedly heat up Earth’s climate, it’s news that there is a connection between climate and 5G. On a positive side, Reza showed he can discuss with his opponents difficult technical issues in a civil manner.
Reza swears that nobody at S5GI nor he support the globalist agenda. But he, like Tanja below, use Facebook personally and as campaigning tool consolidating and connecting the grassroots under S5GI. Jew psychopath Mark Zuckerberg’s FB is a globalist tech instrument to control Humanity with the CIA-Microsoft-Google etc. industrial-government oppressive complex, created by and under strict control by the Jew bankster cabal.
FB group setups expose all users and their secondary contacts to invigilation and manipulation by the complex. FB and other social networks have been exploited to manipulate the Arab Spring, Brexit and Trump election, and God knows what else using megadata from trackimg and measuring  the behaviour of social media users.
Well done, globalist agent Reza Ganjavi, it does not matter if of the useful idiot or the stooge kind.

Tanja Rebel — who she is not

Tanja has a useful ignorant’s history in XR  (that she prefers not to recollect and renounce). She confirms in e-discussions her lingering ideological confusion: polit-correct elements of cultural neomarxism,  climate change idiocy, Zionist Holocaust belying, and mindless sensing of “antisemitism”.

In her discussions, also here, here and here, the disposer of stolen Appeal, Tanja Rebel signs her emails with litanies of who she is not. Collated from her emails to date, she considers herself to be more or less what she signed on 22.2.2020:

Not a Eugenicist, Nor a one-eyed extremist, Not UN paid, Nor in XR, Not a Zionist, Nor an anti-semite, Not funded by Soros, Nor a bully, Not a harasser, Merely a grassroot activist who believes in international cooperation

Served in a sauce of slurs reversed at the critics, this stew of virtue-signalling labels instead of concrete answers to questions does not pass vetting. One need not be consciously Soros-funded eugenist to serve globalist agenda as a useful idiot. On July 2, 2020, prompted by a new discussant, Tanja finally gave a straight answer on her XR membership:

The bullies who cry loudest know – for I told them many months ago – that I was part of XR Rebellion early on, but that I have since left. The picture taken was long ago when I was a steward at a local XR Rebellion march. I helped coordinate for I thought at the time that they would be awake to all pollution. They were not and still aren’t. I fought hard to get XR to ask Councils and Government to declare Environment – not one-eyed Climate – Emergency, but they would not. When I persisted I was subsequently blocked from their Facebook group (the local one) and I left, starting a separate Stop 5G group on the Isle of Wight.

In fact, I asked Tanja previously and got “cease and desist” scares, fortified with “attorney” Reza’s threats. Now Tanja indirectly admits she works for the globalists; I rebuked:

All pollution is one, since the villain is one: the Jew bankster cabal in control of money, economy, technology. They shape and program our lives and lifestyles, commandeer us into scam-demic obedience, so why don’t they nudge us into truly environmentally friendly lifestyles, and reform their corporate and military practices — genocidal to Humanity and Biosphere. They can arrange zillions in own bailouts, but not even a mere call for remedies on Fukushimas they control by deceptive “dialectic”: Jew hydrocarbons (dirty) versus Jew nuclear energy (clean). So fighting anything of the whole is futile without naming the culprit. You are out of luck, Tanja, this can’t be done withourt being “antisemitic”.

Exhaled CO2 and cow farts are pollution to Tanja, but radiation from “clean” nuclear power and waste is not. Making people guilty covers up the globalists. So does belittling those who name the villain: the globalist Jew bankster cabal. Centralisation pursued by S5GI too often result in hijack by the cabal. S5GI has not developed any effective strategy,  struggles with science of the issues and is unable to sort out junk from quality information. In effect S5GI castrates the grassroots to the cabal’s advantage. I “bullied” on:

“Group think” is imposed by herding local outfits into “international”  Stop5G FB (another evil Jew’s tech, why are you using it, Tanja?). Junk&bunk gets publicity, instead of real info that would educate the public and shut up Big Telco’s smears. Activists Claire and Tanja have both refused public correction of the junk&bunk. To me it is indirect support of the globalist agenda (knowingly or not).

Tanja opportunistically condones “climate change” ideology: [S5GI] choose to remain credible in the Public’s eye as that is the main way to retain and gain public support. As you well know, the general Public are so brain-washed that it is hard to get through to them at all and screaming way-out there claims at them won’t help. Neither will denying Climate Change, for – like it or not – Climate is the mantra of our time. Tiptoeing instead of telling how the cabal shapes public perceptions is irresponsible at best, complacency with the globalist agenda otherwise. S5GI may as well resign, sparing us globalist lies peddled to win the public over.

The “antisemite” slur came to bear in Tanja’s hawkishnessHere’s a “joke” for all to savour: A raving loonie anti-Semite, a smart industry employed person convicted of manslaughter (maiming a person for life) and a UN Stooge accuse someone of being a genocidal maniac. The “antisemite” is me, for pointing out to Tanja that her cultural neomarxist zeal may lead astray as it did an XR activist in Canada, who referred to a caricature of the Holocaust, a false version of Shoah scripted and orchestrated  by the Jew bankster cabal and Zionist Jew puppets.

Tanja’s “ethnic” slurs indicate she is Holocaust-denier as the majority have suffered most, e.g. Poland lost 80% of intelligentsia and at least 6 million documented citizens. She is also an antisemite as she ignores accounts by the survivors of Orthodox Jews murdered in Shoah by the Zionists. She is pro-Zionist for the same reasons, plus   hijacking the term Holocaust exlusively for Jews, in order to justify the Holocaust Industry and “Religion” and the Zionist occupation of Palestine.

She does not make sense, either, in terms of revolution exploits by the Judeocentric cabal for centuries, returning in the neo-marxist destabilisation of the USA via BLM communists, according to leading analyst Jon Christopher Bjerknes, a Jew who “has killed the Jew in himself”. 

In short, Tanja has a globalist-Judeocentric ideological mess in her mind. Who needs such pre-programmed activists in a movement against globalist, Israel- and psychopath Jew-led technology of 5G? Coincidentally, similar “ethnicities” govern the plandemic technologies.

This writer is a survivor of the broader Holocaust that includes goyim, if we followed an equivalent of the Judeocentric definition of Jew Holocaust survivors that covers all living Jews regardless whether they descend from those rescued from Shoah or not. My late Father came very close to annihilation by the genocide of Polish intelligentsia and patriots in the hands of joint actions by Zionist Nazi Jew Gestapo and Soviet Jew NKVD political police.  

Tanja is out of luck. Taught by the tragic history of my family and my Polish nation, I will relentlessly pursue ideological garbage that infects arrogant ignorants and fanatics, poisoning the general public. I owe it to my ancestors, Eastern European survivors of genocidal World Wars orchestrated by the Jew bankster cabal, and to the millions of martyrs who innocently perished because the Jew “revolutionaries” hated them and sacrificed in the world wars and revolutions to further supremacist Jew goals.

Roots and operations of deceptive globalist agenda

The fake “climate change” agenda is obvious:

Among the first signs that fake climate change and Stop5G were conflated into one campaign was this Swiss poster, marvelled over by Claire (similar one Reza applauded for Stop 5G Schweiz):

The climate change hysteria flows from media-distorted and -overblown, dodgy IPCC science. In the hyped-up abhorrent and repugnant craze that sucks some young people into suicide and many more into clinical depression, Greta Thunberg leads inter-generational warfare to divide and conquer masses for globalist agenda that is hidden from view. XR is a street implementer of this mental garbage; respectable mothers of families fall into the trap. So do many government officials, while their colleague members of secret societies know well what is at stake.

Supplemented with system knowledge by Shai Danon, an Israeli publicist for a better world, Claire lays out her understanding of the recent history and goals of the globalist agenda of depopulation and cyborgization. Independently, but with threads common with Claire’s, Mark Windows explains the forces underlying a capture of anti-5G movements and the connection with the Fake Green Agenda, UN and Citizen Assemblies. The latter one fools people into submission to undemocratic governance and manipulative delphi “public” meetings that steer away from public benefit. Interviews with XR protesters reveal a cognitive dissonance  as to issue formulation and vested global interests.

Hosted by Danish investigative reporter Lucas Alexander for Age Of Truth TV, Norwegian scientist and researcher of climate politics and history, Dr. Jacob Nordangård tells that Rockefellers and other elitist families are behind the orchestration of the “Climate agenda” (he calls it “depopulation plan”). The topics discussed indicate the depth of Nordangård’s research (see his books):

UN Agendas 21/2030; climate change denial; environmentalism; secret societies and think tanks: Club of Rome, Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, CFR, Federal Reserve and Population Council 1952; Rockefeller dynasty, Illuminati bloodline families and NWO elitist power structure; Greta Thunberg, Aldous Huxley and Brave New World; gender and transgender agenda, New Age movement; Sweden, feminism, microchipping; veganism; occult rituals; 5G, SmartMeters, SmartCities, EM frequerncies and radiation; HAARP, DEW, chemtrails, mind control…

From my own research for Prof. Christian Scherrer’s International Comparative Genocide Research Project, the NWO idea, plan and multi-faceted implementation began with the Rothschilds in 18th century. I conclude:

Numerous power groups are responsible for millions of fatalities in 20th century wars and genocides, but NWO-apocalyptic-messianic Judeocentrics seem to lead them all. Extreme Jews and Jewish bankers have instigated, supported and executed wars and revolutions. Judeocentrics had traded off a few hundred thousands new settlers in Israel for tens of millions dead in 20th century wars, incl. Jewish masses opposed to Zionism. Human life means nothing to them, in accord with Talmudic hatred and fanaticism. Shabbataian Frankists and Dönmeh, and Zionists are still at play in world’s power centres. They are the Judeocentric Power Complex (JPC), a global web of extreme Judeocentrics and Gentile supporters, not just the Zionists, all guided by “end time” ideology.

[…] JPC elite’s beliefs in total evil and destruction of Gentiles for redemption of Jews, have been driving Judeocentrics at the helm of global politics since the 17th century. The process manipulates global Jewry, including Orthodox Jews who oppose Zionism and NWO as contrary to Torah. Judeocentric policies follow Zionist, Bolshevik, Nazi and Communist traditions, coated in new phrases and rhetoric. JPC rhetoric, history, and recent developments point to advancement of the NWO ploy…

I must have hit some truth, as the paper togethter with dozens of others from leading independent genocide researchers (which I’m not one formally) have been destroyed on Prof. Scherrer’s computer shortly before publication in Volume 1, reserved for the most significant cointributions on this ambitious project covering 20th and 21st century genocide. In an update I would include the “technological” genocide I’ve learned since then: abortions, nuclear pollution, GMO, Rockefeller “medicine”, Big Pharma poisoning, chemtrails, vaccinations,  wireless…

For example Rising Up! and Extinction Rebellion

An out-of-date website of Rising Up! (RU) directs to Extinction Rebellion (XR) and posts forms to pledge and join them. RU consists of former activists of Compassionate Revolution Ltd. (birthed in the Occupy movement), Earth First! Occupy, Plan Stupid, Radical Think Tank and Reclaim the Power, offering a space that can be used for actions needing collective intent. In the  UK anti-fracking protests, the Reclaim the Power instigators did not end up in courts, but the grassroots activists did, so the “Ltd.” predecessor is intriguing:

Technically Compassionate Revolution Limited is a company limited by shares; we have no intention of profiting from this venture. As “Directors” we gift our time to the “company” and we will run the “company” along gift economy lines. If we need financial support for some element of the work, for example some technology changes, we may ask members to gift donations. We have incorporated because company Directors have limited liabilities- often with devastating consequences. We believe changes to the law are vital to hold company directors responsible for the activities of their companies.

Roger Hallam, a brain behind Reclaim the Power, RU and XR explains how he saves his own skin: recruit grassroot activists who want to go to jail for the cause. RU website confirmspeople may be willing to undertake acts of defiance, some of which could be illegal […] and they may wish to share their actions with others. Our site and processes are designed to support such sharing that is done by giving individual groups the decision power, but upon advice / feedback and continual review by a strategy group who sets the date and type of mass actions,  and the broad frame and demands of these events — a scheme like the “actions” Stop 5G Int’l appointed itself to organise globally.

Hallam reveals in a summary of a “climate emergency” campaign that he would be very interested in extremely valuable key activists joining the team or starting escalations in your own locality […] contact me or other people involved in such actions to get meet face to face and discuss the nitty gritty of what is planned. 

As team leader RU website features Gail Bradbrook, a doctor of biology, an economic justice campaigner and compassionate revolutionary. According to a public document “Principles and Values” (March 2018) she was RU co-founder: The initial members of the Holding Group were decided by the former strategy group (Roger Hallam, Simon Bramwell and Gail Bradbrook) at the RU gathering in Stroud, March 2017, as Stu Basden, Gail Bradbrook, Simon Bramwell and Jay. She names XR: it’s the biggest thing we have attempted. People are hosting talks in the areas where they live and we’re asking them if they are willing to take part in processes that will lead to arrest and very short periods of time in jail.

Among key resources for nonviolent activists, Bradbrook and “Principles and Values” recommend Blueprint for Revolution by Srdja Popovic, a super-activist produced by CIA and US State Department for carrying out “non-violent revolution around the world”, from Otpor! that toppled down Slobodan Milosevic (later murdered in his cell during trial in the Hague), through colour revolutions, Arab Spring, Euromaidan and “refugee” flooding of Europe, to “anti-government” protests in Iran today. The manual for these operations was developed by U. of Massachusetts professor Gene Sharp, the founder of Albert Einstein Institute, which trained provocateurs to launch popular resistance campaigns around the world, aimed at replacing governments opposed to the dictates of Western elites.

Hallamwe all stand on the shoulders of the giants who went before us – namely Gandhi and Martin Luther Kings and the many practitioners of nonviolent struggle from around the world. Our contribution has been to systematise the approach for our western highly digitalised context.

How it all fits together

From her experience as White anglophone in Quebec under terror by the separatist, Marxist-Leninist  and paramilitary Front de libération du Québec (FLQ), augmented by the events of “solidarity with natives” protests, Canadian grassroots analyst AmazingPolly lays out the structure of revolutinoary cell network under oligarchs’ management:

marxist revolution
Polly interprets the graph starting at minute 42:00, as follows:
  • Overarching cover is Civil Society, in the triad with State and Market
  • Overarching ideology is Marxism
  • Hierarchical Core = worldwide network of super-oligarchs
  • Operative Cells = movements and groups e.g. antifa, and protesters for native, Black power, environmental etc.causes who farm out to anarchists  and other Leaderless Cells and Individual Operatives outside of the Functional Core
  • Peripheral Assistance to Operative Cells and Individual Operatives

The graph used by Polly is a subset of a larger picture of global Bankster structure of power and control. From fragmentary info I imagine it looks like this, in hierarchical order of levels, more or less:

  • The highest level (Banksters) contain Decision and Steering Functions: ideology, strategy, intelligence, technology, analysis…
  • Executive Group for global mass manipulation of conscience by ideology, religion (Bnai Brith, Chabad Lubavitch, Zionists…)
  • Special Ops — Kosher Nostra, intelligence services and special forces of selected “states” (USA, UK, Israel, Saudi Arabia….)
  • Financial/Economic Ops — global/regional banks, central banks, investment banks, subordinate corporations
  • Implementation Group for world-wide government bodies (UN, IAEA, NATO, WHO…), national governments (via Bilderbergers, CFR, Trilateral Commission…), top hierarchies of religions, State of Israel, Illuminati
  • Media Management (MSM and “alternative”, movies, pop culture, current spin, re-writing history)
  • NGO Management

Compare to a hierarchy depicted by a US blogger, author on an article on Gaites as crypto-Jew and a cog in the global Jew cabal. The Author deems Illuminati to be the driving force, whereas I believe they are just a lower-level in the Jew bankster pyramid. :

In the graph that Polly uses, the Hierarchical Core would be subordinated to NGO Management from Bankster scheme, while Peripheral Assistance would flow from its lower levels.

  • Civil Society is Soros-controlled NGOs.
  • State is run by corrupted partiocracy/democracy.
  • Market is Corporations and their law system inserted into law-giving of State and International Institutions.
  • Peripheral Assistance are various official institutions, foundations, institutes, think tanks, government departments, intelligence services and their operatives like Antifa…
  • Super oligarchs in Hierarchical Core are lower-level bankster (Soros…) and other “movers and shakers”.

Epilogue

Stuart Basden co-founded XR. In RisingUp! he was Holding Group member. He was also in the XR Guardianship Team —  sort of neo-Comintern politruks. Creep Basden’s reversely racist, hateful (racially, geo-ethnically), historically belied and “gender”-wise messed up neo-marxist credo:
[…] constructed delusions that have been coded into societies and institutions around the world: 
  • The delusion of white-supremacy centres whiteness and the experience of white people, constructing and perpetuating the myth that white people and their lives are somehow inherently better and more valuable than people of colour. 
  • The delusion of patriarchy centres the male experience, and excludes/hinders female assigned people from public life (reducing them to a possession or object for ownership or consumption). Patriarchy teaches dominating and competitive behaviours, and emphasises the idea that the world is a place of scarcity, separation and powerlessness. 
  • The delusions of Eurocentrism include the notion that Europeans know what is best for the world. 
  • The delusions of hetero-sexism/heteronormativity propagate the idea that heterosexuality is ‘normal’ and that other expressions of sexuality are deviant. 
  • The delusions of class hierarchy uphold the theory that the rich elite are better/smarter/nobler than the rest of us, and make therefore better decisions. 
Most anybody could take Basden’s gibberish apart. I will not waste time here. The point is that people of this sort mobilize millions to actions on behalf of the globalists… and masses trust them! — like in the French and Bolshevik revolutions, in major wars, e.g. Spanish war and Stalin’s wars for psychopath’s domination.
Most cynical in all of this: scores of grassroots activists are deluded that perpetrators (“class hierarchy“) of 5G somehow don’t deceive Humanity on climate change and the globalist agenda they unwittingly support. Two characteristics strike the observer in the personalities reviewed here: ideological confusion and quest for social control. Will the grassroots fall prey of such useful idiot “revolutionaries” who believe they help liberate Humanity from the chains of the bankster NWO cabal?

See also

……………………………………………………………..

Appendix 1. Exoneration of Nicolya Christi

On Wednesday, August 5, 2020, 06:56:08 AM PDT, Nicolya Christi wrote:
The only response I can give to this latest round of defamation from Claire Edwards is the same as I have all along. Where is her irrefutable proof re the allegations she continues to make about me? – allegations that could not be further from the truth. 

Several times I have offered to speak directly with her to put her straight but she will not communicate other than slander me in emails and online. If she were really interested in the truth then surely she would wish to get her facts straight rather than putting two and two together and presenting six?

I agreed to her conditions to take my own initiative WorldShift.Earth offline, a platform which had nothing at all to do with the C of Budapest or any other Club as she continues to accuse and state as ‘fact’, and which I have never ever had anything to do with personally to the point of being known to be vehemently opposed to such. She stated that if I took WS.Earth offline and removed myself from the overall stop 5g movement she would leave me alone. I did so but still this incomprehensible vendetta against me continues. I took WS.Earth down because after her ongoing public slandering and wrongful association of it with the “Clubs” she refers to after realising that to continue on with it would invite ongoing attacks from her and thus it would never be free of her false allegations/associations. 

For the record again:

1) My only association with Ervin Laszlo is as a writer, one of several invited to contribute to three of his books. There was a co-written endeavour re a manuscript at his invitation, which amounted to nothing. He wrote a book some years ago titled ‘WorldShift 2012’, which I never read but was inspired by the title ‘WorldShift’ as this is what the world is going through now, an important and timely shift. In 2009, I was invited to join a group called ‘WS2012′ which consisted of just three people and never got off the ground. I broke away several months later and set up WorldShift Movement alone. It had absolutely no association or involvement whatsoever with any ‘Club’. I cannot emphasise enough that my involvement with “Clubs”/“Soros”/”eugenicist practices” etc is the same as any one of you randomly cc-d into Claire’s email attacks on me – in other words, like you, I have zero involvement/association. I had not even heard of the name “Soros” until she accused me of being funded by it/him. I did not even know what “eugenicist” meant and had to look it up.

2) I did not set up S5GI nor did or do I fund it. I cannot even fund my own life and so continue to live from hand to mouth. I did not agree to it being called Stop5G International and made that clear. The group consensus made its final decision. I can confirm that S5GI are a group of dedicated everyday people who care as deeply about the threat of 5g to humanity, Nature and the Earth as anyone copied into these emails.

3) I did put a call out last May (2019) to set up an ‘International Counter-5G Round Table’ and a person who wished to join the group invited some of her own contacts Claire being one. I had no prior knowledge of Claire before as the stop 5g movement was something I had never been part of. Claire “dropped out” (in her own words) before the first call and not for the grossly inaccurate reasons she cites but because she had come straight in wildly accusing another genuinely innocent participant of being an “infiltrator”, “agent for the dark agenda” and an “actor”, and had become obsessive and very vocal about that stating that either “he went or she would not join”. I made it clear he was no such thing and she then by her own choice “dropped out” and turned on me. I began to hear that she had been bad-mouthing me to potential new colleagues – and here we are today. Someone who knows her well stated that if you are on the right side of her you are safe but if you are on the wrong side she turns into a formidable enemy. The fact is I made a stand for an innocent party she was publicly falsely accusing and thus came under her radar by having done so and have since been the subject of her malignant obsession. People who know me well and know what I am having to deal with here state that the Claire Edwards they have looked at on the video interviews she has made where she slanders me, comes across as “elegant, eloquent,  intelligent, and believable” and they are astonished it is the same Claire Edwards writing the emails and online attacks. Most people will not see the bewildering extent of vicious language she uses to convey her fabrications about me, which is so extreme that the term ‘psychosis’ and ’split personality’ immediately spring to mind.

4) I am no longer part of the stop 5g movement having upheld my word and agreement to leave. I have nothing to do with it at all. In fact, the entire experience has been so distressing that I wish I had never ventured into that arena in the first place, which I did only out of deep concern re the impact of 5g on the health and wellbeing of all living beings; a concern I wrote about in March 2019 – https://nicolyachristi.love/5g-a-humanitarian-crisis-nicolya-christi/ – after which I put out a call to some internationally located ‘stop 5g’ spearheads for the purpose of joining forces for the greater good of combined worldwide efforts to stop 5g. 

5) I am none of what she accuses and if she would only get onto a call – along with everyone she copies into her attacks for the purpose of acting as some kind of jury backing her up – (only now I discover that these people never asked or gave permission for her to copy them in as I never gave permission for her to expose my email address to all and anyone she chooses) – I would answer every single question/accusation/allegation and you would all come to realise that Claire is grossly wrong on every count and that this is all a devastating misrepresentation (attack/personal vendetta) against myself. But she will refuse to do so as she has before because her accusations would transpire to be null and void and the reputation she is trying to build for herself on the back of my own would turn to dust. It is also clear that Claire feels a lot of anger towards S5GI and even though she knows I am no longer part of it still she attacks it – why?

6) The only thing I can agree with in all she cites is that I too have reservations about the Club of Rome – which I know nothing about but it is just a feeling I have. The Club of Budapest I have NEVER had anything to do with but my gut feeling backed up by observations is that it is a benign few pockets of inactive, isolated, and mostly retired individuals, who are followers of Ervin Laszlo’s Work. Were Claire to conduct proper, thorough and scrupulous research she would see that there is no linking of my name to that organisation at all, not even on the long list of member names cited. But she botches ill-fitting jigsaw pieces together to create a picture that is utterly false in regard to myself and her litany of accusations about me. She literally makes it up as she goes along to suit the agenda’d narrative in her head. Ervin Laszlo asked me to become involved with the Club of Budapest a few times and I blatantly refused to the point of offending him. I am a free spirit. I work alone. I have no interest in joining such groups. I am not funded and financially barely survive from one week to the next. The round table I initiated (no longer operative) was to be a think-tank type closed group to brainstorm about what could be done to stop 5g.
 
7)  If one can attack another on such a public scale because of a former association, then why is no one asking about her own eighteen-year ’top level’ association with the nefarious UN? Does that make her all that she accuses me of too? An organisation she vilifies on one hand yet, as it would appear, receives funds from with the other in the form of a pension. Is this not blood money and therefore a contradiction in terms?

8) I had/have nothing to do with any other WorldShift outside of the initial phone calls (never a single meeting) with WS2012 (2009), the set-up of my own WS.Movement (2010), and a brief foray into evolving that into something called WSInternational (2011), which came to nothing as pressure was applied to link it to the C of Budapest without my permission and in direct opposition to my emphatic stance. So I immediately dropped WSInternational within weeks of it being launched. The final straw re WS Movement/WS International was when after remaining unwavering about keeping the C of B away from it only to then hear that permission had been given for “132 world shift URL’s” to be made available to all and anyone including C of B members. My response was to immediately delete WSInternational. Eight years later after no other WS activities as far as I could tell, I decided to independently launch WS.Earth and did not inform EL as it was nothing to do with him. However within months Claire had jumped on it inaccurately associating it with “Clubs/Soros/eugenicists/Laszlo” etc and I realised I needed to finally let go of the vision I had held since 2010 of a movement for the people because it would be hounded by Claire and thus forever tainted by the wilful and calculated destruction she was out to cause.

9) With regard to her statement that Ervin Laszlo pulled his own site down to hide my name – this is simply not true. It just so happened that he was having a new site built at that time which I knew nothing about and only came to my attention when she pointed that out. I do not follow EL or his endeavours so it was news to me. Several months earlier before any of this had happened I told EL that I did not wish to be on his inactive ‘Faculty’ and to remove my name from his website. It is as simple as that. 

10) With regard to the S5GI video ‘We Do Not Consent’ –  I offered two photographs for it as they were struggling to find royalty free images and emailed people, including me, asking if any such could be donated. I had nothing to do with the making of that video nor the funding of it and was mortified to see my name had been placed in the credits without my permission, which I only saw when it had gone live. I immediately insisted it was removed. The person who took it upon herself to include it without asking me first emailed to say that she had done so because she thought it would ‘prove’ I was no longer part of S5GI, a line of thinking I still fail to grasp. So to reiterate: I have never donated a single penny to S5GI. I am no longer part of it. I have asked to be removed from all mailings and have no involvement at all with it or the stop 5g movement.
 
11) Claire takes her accusations to new heights now with the sudden allegation that I “stole her Appeal and 2.5 years of her work”. The Appeal she refers to is the Earth-Space Appeal, which I have read was the brainchild of at least four people but she claims it as her own. I do not know if it is “hers” or not. However, this latest accusation is yet another classic case of her making it up as she goes along to suit her agenda to further blacken my name. Let me make it clear: I HAVE NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE APPEAL OTHER THAN POSTING IT ON MY SOCIAL MEDIA, AS HAVE MANY THOUSANDS OF OTHERS WHO ARE INSPIRED BY IT. It is on hundreds of sites but she does not accuse each of those of “stealing it and 2.5 years of her work”. Up until recently that accusation was the misfortune of someone else. But now it suits her agenda to pin this allegation on myself. I would never ever steal anyone’s work, nor have I, nor would I ever. Again, rather than throwing further unfounded claims at me why not first present undeniable evidence? But she will only present words that support her fictional script. Her so-called evidence shows a screenshot of the Appeal in a slider on the WS.Earth website – what it does not go on to show is the handful of other worthy causes included in that slider – linking straight out to each respective website. It was in the slider because it merited being highly visible on the WS.Earth site along with the other humanitarian/world-saving causes featured alongside it such as Boyan Slat’s ‘Ocean Clean-Up Campaign’, and Polly Higgin’s ‘Make Ecocide a Crime’ and ‘Earth Protectors’ etc.

I wish that people would insist on seeing hard evidence and irrefutable proof of someone’s accusations about another person. Nobody seems to ask her for this but instead appear to blindly accept whatever she presents and even thank her for doing so. But what she presents in regards to myself is total fabrication. 
 
I am an open book and have nothing to hide but none of her audience seem to be interested in asking me for my side of the story and her interviewers do not insist on her presenting verifibiable facts, (and not her doctored versions). Nor are they contacting me to ask for my side of the story given the slander is about me and my Work. They are not acting from integrity or a professional neutral stance but siding with her and in that are also complicit in her attacks. One of the interviewers I personally contacted asking him why he would air such libellous allegations without presenting verifiable and coherent evidence or checking her story before filming. He would only state: “I personally know Claire and trust her everything she says.”.

I have tried all along to be understanding of Claire’s attempts to expose the ‘dark agenda’ operating in the world but her accusation that I am part of it is 100% incorrect
 
It seems she is now too far in re her ongoing smear-campaign to acknowledge she has made up these wild allegations to blacken my name, all of which are born out of a fanatical obsession with myself. Nor will she apologise for dragging my pristine name and reputation through the mud in the way that she has/is. 
 

Why does she refuse to talk with me and hear my side of the story – a necessary and instrumental action on the part of any investigative party who is genuinely and authentically concerned with exposing facts and not damaging innocent people along the way in the pursuit of that endeavour. 

Is anyone listed here interested in the actual truth in regards to all that she accuses re myself? 

The biggest lesson this has taught me is how easy it is to put random isolated pieces of information together (other than the C of Rome which I know nothing about but do not trust) and turn them into a work of fiction worthy of Hollywood. 

How do I even begin to extricate myself from this web of falsities and untruths when she is relentless, driven to the point of fanatical, in regard to the ruination of my name, reputation and Work.  

There is no accusation that Claire can levy at me that I could not stop in its tracks were I afforded the opportunity to put the record straight on each and every allegation/statement. But instead I am reduced to trying to do so in exhaustive and all too lengthy emails (as I have done several times over the past months) each of which are met with further attacks and hostile counter-accusations. She has no interest in listening to my responses to her allegations, the more I deny them the more preposterous and extreme the next round of allegations.

If anyone has any answers as to how I can prove that I am none of what I am being accused of I would really appreciate your advice?

I respect and support her compulsion to expose the ‘dark’ but to do so authentically one must be scrupulous in their research and presentation of facts. Otherwise, as I have stated before, the effect is that of an antibiotic flushing out good bacteria along with the ‘bad’. 

Please, before you take in all that she states about me do ask for irrefutable evidenceto back up her claims – none will be provided only juxtaposed jigsaw pieces botched together to embellish the fantasy she has in her head fuelled by her obsession – a point supported by mocking references in regard to the way I look, the sound of my voice, my reputation re my Work, etc. 


There is not a single shred of evidence to confirm that I am or have ever been part of any ‘Club’. All who are part of the C of B are publicly listed. I do not know where you would find that list but googling might lead you to it. If you do find it you will not see my name (even though other names she accuses will be on it) because I refused to be part of it and never wavered for a moment on that stance.
 
There are dozens of statements and claims she has made about me all set out in dozens of emails I have been copied into along with endless lists of people unknown to myself. One such statement which she has visited a few times, but now with increasing fervour, is that my name is on a “new Nuremburg Trials list for crimes against humanity” – this is just one fraction of what I have been dealing with since December 2019, when ‘Stop 5G International’ launched. As far as I am concerned, the only person splitting and dividing the stop 5g movement is Claire Edwards who peddles her script to anyone, world-wide, who will listen. And they do … and they believe … and my name is muddied at best. 
 
My final word on all of this is to implore anyone who reads or watches anything that Claire Edwards states about me to insist on viewing unadulterated, non-botched together ill-fitting puzzle-pieces that from her perspective enhance her inauthentic and personal agenda’d narrative and objective.
 
I hope my Work speaks for itself. PEACE, LOVE, LIGHT, TRUTH, KINDNESS and GOODNESS are my compass, and nothing or no one will ever throw me off course.

In Truth.
 
Namaste,

Nicolya



Nicolya ♥♥

www.nicolyachristi.love
https://www.facebook.com/nicolyac
https://www.facebook.com/NicolyaChristi/

………………………………………………………………

Appendix 2. Draft retracted on August 6, 2020. Originally under different link

Piotr Bein, since 3.2.2020

Contents

Conclusions

Agents, useful ignorants and bullying

Arthur Firstenberg’s hijack

Shortcomings of the Appeal

Implications for campaigning

Stop 5G International press release for Jan 25th Global Day of 5G Protest

Claire Edwards’ discoveries

Genocidal globalist agenda

“Attorney” Reza Ganjavi gate-keeper

Tanja Rebel — who she is not

Roots and operations of deceptive globalist agenda

For example Rising Up! and Extinction Rebellion

How it all fits together

Epilogue

See also

Conclusions

Having deciphered deceptions and maniipulations by the globalists and their agents (mindful of it or not) among us, the grassroots’ independent thinkers don’t wish the Appeal Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (the Appeal) be used by dubiously-connected orgs  to approach local, national nor quasi-world governments.

These entities are in bed with, or could readily be corrupted by the globalists whose agenda the agents chose to support. Time is out and it’s a wrong approach, just as emphasis on health effects is, without talking loudest about the 5G enslavement weapon: total control over Humanity towards NWO, with intermediate phases — Depopulation, Cyborgization, Transhumanism.

From lessons of the past year, grassroot groups should be watchful of cooption and subjugation attempts by the globalists. As important, they should revise strategy and tactics to adjust activities to newly discovered and emerging conditions and threats. It’s clear that we should remain in distributed, dispersed independent structures for robustness and diversity — the mimic of resilient natural ecosystems, the Maker’s Creation.

Grassroot independent groups and citizens are encouraged to closely watch the potentially controlled orgs, who ostensibly self-declare a stance against 5G. Should you discover that their agitation, propaganda and actions indicate corruption of Humanity’s will, expose them. Disseminate your findings to warn and alert others, and when necessary withdraw from activity under their auspices.

On a positive note, the episode should stimulate the grassroots to revise current strategy and tactics, with a view on devising a more effective course.  Persons deemed “opposition” agents have many talents and there would be ample room to use those abilities and skills for the Common Good, once the muddy waters are cleared.

Agents, useful ignorants and bullying

In e-wrestling between the exposers and the accused referred to below, the latter ones object to the former’s vocabulary. Here is a legal definition of agent: someone or something that acts or exerts power : a moving force in achieving some result. Agents are not necessarily nefarious; the concept of an agent of influence is more relevant. Such person is a useful ignorant when he or she advances an interest harmful to Humanity, while remaining unaware about it. Some of the persons react to critique as if they were under direct or indirect control by the alien interests or powers. I callpolitruks the higher-level agents steering lower-level agents (from Soviet and Comintern politicheskiy rukovoditel = political handler).

In non-government and front organisations, consciousness of the leaders determines the character of the group, as ideologically non-compliant members resign or are purged. The more likely are deliberate conscious acts under direct control by politruks, the more removed a group is from genuine grassroots. The critiqued ones  blame their victims, the exposers, in a self-defence reaction. Displacing own fault onto the victim intimidates the critic and absolves the offender from examining their own behaviour. Victimisation may induce fear in the victim, even infecting the community.

Oppressor’s attack  fabricates own victimhood to justify the abuse and to manipulate the audience, perhaps even as a coping strategy and attention gainer. Abuser’s self-victimhood claims that the abuse was justified by the victim’s reprehensible behavior. Enter dehumanization (treating others as impaired mentally, malicious etc., thus scocial outliers) and diverting attention away from own abusive acys. The abuser counts on gaining and maintaining power and control over another person, but the act in itself serves to reinforce/enlarge abuser’s power in a group.

Abusers usually play victims to justify to themselves the cognitive dissonance between self-awareness and the way they treat others. In turn, victimhood expressed outwards attempts to deflect/evade negative opinion/condemnation from the audience. Unending threats of legal action serve to re-inforce the victimization effect both in- and out-wardly. A normal, honest person doesn’t need to do that to defend their stance. A letter from an attorney for couple of hundred bucks usually takes care of real offenders. Skilful attorneys can get the cost reimbursed by the offender.

I’ve been privy to a stage of victimisation of Claire Edwards, after her intellectual property (half of the Appeal) has been stolen and used by a group she would not approve of morally. She was broken down at the time, didn’t wish to deal with it anymore and rejected my offer to publish her discovery and e-conversations with her adversaries. Claire and others may have experienced byllying, a personal response under conditions of social power imbalance to the benefit of the abuser. Hostile intent and repetition over a period would also point to bullying. It is asserted in this case psychologically/emotionally by repeated verbal harassment and threats.

Some of our bullies seem arrogant and narcissistic — again, the abuser empowers himself by demeaning the victim. Some of them do it either to “reverse” being bullied by others, to act out an inflated fragile ego, or in reaction to criticism or perceived disrespect because they think too highly of themselves. Other risk factors in a potential abuser that might apply here (some evidence in discussions) include anger propensity, addiction to aggressivity, misjudging others’ actions as hostile, and self-image preservation — occuring separately or jointly. Personality disorders may also contribute.

Each personal trait alone is sufficient (for me) to reject each person, their org and initiatives, however fine they might appear to be. Unless they markedly improve, they are redundant, superfluous and don’t add value to the grassroots. When a decisive monumental course of collective action is needed to arrest the 5G roll-out, some of them obstructively argue, for example, as if they didn’t know that 5G is a weapon, Greta is a conscious fake and plant, climate change narrative is a manipulation and anthropogenic climate change is a hoax.

From own encounters with bullies, I decided not to yield and restore some balance of social power between the parties. I only regret I’ve not reacted earlier to this  obviously globalist assault, but hope others can benefit from examining the case for early detection and prevention in their own activism.

Arthur Firstenberg’s hijack

Co-creator of famous Appeal Stop 5G on Earth and in Space, Claire Edwards has alarmed that her colleague and co-author on that project, Arthur Firstenberg has hijacked it and transferred to a group serving globalist agenda. Arthur Firstenberg may have committed two transgressions of law and ethical conduct:

  • He has effectively stolen Claire Edwards intellectual property — about half the contribution to the Appeal — and is disposing of it without her consent.
  • He disposed of the signatories’ endorsement of anti-5G cause — in effect an anti-globalist ideal — by making the document available to ostensibly same cause but in the hands of people with dubious connections to globalist agenda.

Using ca. 200k signatory e-addresses he collected, Arthur keeps emailing 5G news out, some of them without stating the source properly. This opens an additional door to globalist agent provocateurs, not to mention Arthur’s  impudence of ignoring requests by signatories to have their signatures and e-addresses removed from his database.

Arthur is key to this scandalous assault on grassroots. With his submission of the Appeal without signatories’ permission, globalists would be able to use it to legitimize their activity on 5G front, with a potential to capture/derail/deflate independent national and local movements for ultimate globalist control.

Also important is Arthur’s ideology of science. A convinced quantum physicist by education, referring to a propagandist entry on RationalWiki as his source he rejects torsion field science, that he deems to be a hoax. On anthropogenic climate change, however, he quotes  politically correct sources that avoid delving into falsification of climate data by IPCCC and lack of positive proof for a correlation of atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature. This cognitive dissonace is congruent with climate ideology of some of the people at Stop 5G International.

The Appeal is now in self-appointed Stop 5G International activists’ hands. Tanja Rebel, Kate Kheel and Pernille Schriver figure as contacts on the org’s press release below. There may be other persons in the org and related or collaborating groups, such as Stop5G in Zuckerberg’s fb outlet of corporate mass control, censorship and manipulation by the ruling cabal aka military-industrial-government complex.

Shortcomings of the Appeal

Apart from the moral flaws, the Appeal under present custody also needs improvement to become a more effective campaign tool. As is, the Appeal could be mental trap for inexpert users, e.g. Big Telecom could show off an “effort” to soften the technology to cause lesser bio-impact, but  retain full capability in the other aspects. This is already plain, e.g. pushing fibreoptic cables (known to harm electrosensitives), or Li-Fi as scantly tested as everything in wireless.
The Appeal is not suitable in its campaign and education functions intended by Stop 5G International, since it,
  • Reflects only the admin/contributors’ mindset (e.g. Arthur Firstenberg’s scientific/ideological bias above).
  • Presumes for itself more importance and usefullness to national/local groups than it can offer. Some groups, for example, command more advanced expertise for public education and submissions to govt etc.
  • Is not being updated, e.g. it talks about 20k satellites while officially the number more than doubled. It does not follow the deployment of stratospheric drones and baloons for 5G, an essentiall supplement to the satellite hordes.
  • Contains inaccurate and incomplete info about wireless and its bio-effects. Not-so-expert groups would uncritically copy and propagate it.
  • Misses the other aspects of 5G systems and later generations: mass control, selective cohort/individual target weapon, transhumanism… These are no less important long-term than health effects.
Why would grassroots need a central org? Even if they accepted some steering, the self-appointed team at Stop 5G International does not have the necessary cross-domain expertise. Ideological confusion and fanaticism coupled with naivete and defective moral compass are prominent among them. The org’s people are not capable of strategic direction to local groups, nor technical expertise necessary to understand the technology before it could be stopped. 

Implications for campaigning

This is also the right time to examine grassroots strategy and tactics in light of a rather meagre progress. Many activists call to put differences aside and unite against common adversary. I asked: To do what? but “managers” at Stop 5G International do not answer. Calls for unity are understandable, but now is also an opportune moment to infiltrate/capture grassroots. The Stop 5G Internationall org and the quality of some of its people open the door to infiltration and capture. Past year has shown that,
  • The above non-health issues are not prominent in local group campaigns, as the public is poorly educated and the leading activists fear being ridiculed by the ranks and file and by the wireless lobby and corporate media.
  • ICNIRP, a private club created by the the wireless lobby, and other bodies influenced or under military-industrial complex’s control (WHO, IARC…) act under a covert agenda in conflict with Humanity’s good, refusing to tighten safe limits for RF irradiation. The opposite ensues in former Soviet block;: standards are being relaxed a 100-fold to match those in the Western world.
  • Governments at all levels largely don’t care about public protests, expert conferences and appeals, nor submissions to hearings etc.
  • School and medical boards could not care less that students, patients, and staff are constattly exposed to Wi-Fi radiation, as long as their hides are covered by federal/state emission standards.
  • Seemingly non-globalist states like Russian Federation show their true colours, by declaring support for 5G roll-out and AI implementation. Despite national opposition, Putin has by presidential decree declared green light for 5G.
  • Big Telecom’s propaganda neutralises our public education efforts. At the same time, most users of wireless telecom become addicted to their gadgets and the new “lifestyle”.
  • Focus on 5G rather than on all wireless contributors to the “soup” skews activist and public attention onto the lobby’s “safe” limits from 1G thru 5G.

For grassroots strategy-setting, more useful would be a structured platform for sharing key material (vetted by specialists), and, based on local experience, approaches that work and technical submissions to hearings and legislators. Individual groups and users could peruse the material according to their needs. Groups on FB and similar platforms do not fill the bill. They are oulets of info-tech’s mass surveillance, manipulation, censorship and data harvesting. They attract desinfo and trolls. Moderators may mow down or purge whom they choose to, and may lack expertise to assess posted material.

A website/blog posting links submitted by local org sources (assumed to be guarded against the above) to their own material seems a better solution. In any case, we should keep in mind that the net could be closed down. Rather than centralised organisation schemes and communications outside of our control, we need resilient, dispersed structure: higly educated, self-directed grassroots locally diversified and independent of each other.

The globalist bullies of Reclaim the Power have infiltrated UK anti fracking protests, and later morphed, together with like Climate Camp, into Extinction Rebellion. A grassroots member warns of actions led by those people, as due to social media publicity, the groups caused intense police coverage at anti-fracking eventsThe courts used those media posts as evidence that the ENTIRE anti-fracking movement intends to commit acts of domestic terrorism. The person advises:

The only way to “train” for activism is to get out to a camp or event of your choosing and just DO IT. Remain completely autonomous in your actions and NEVER let anyone tell you what to believe or do.
Trust your gut feelings at all times. Never give your real name or address, email or phone number to anyone until you are completely sure about them.

Real activism avoids breaking the law or at least, avoids being caught doing so. Avoid telling anyone of your plans. Civil disobedience or rebellion is unashamed and indefensible sabotage by large numbers of people. Do not attend such events in public places where facial recognition or surveillance on a huge scale operates.

Stop 5G International press release for Jan 25th Global Day of 5G Protest

In plain view, the supposed grassroot org is exploiting the half-stolen Appeal in the name of world’s anti-5G activism:

The org reps, one of the agent ladies being a veteran of XR, announce delivery of the Appeal to national and covert world government branches: EU, UN, WHO. The latter ones are infamous for unquestionably pushing ICNIRP fake standards of wireless safety. Both groups of institutions keep us “thinking globally” but acting empowered only to a limited degree and only locally, while tramping on our basic rights at both levels, with barely a few current national and local exceptions.

What does Stop 5G International do, aspiring to custody of another Global Day of 5G protest? Nothing revolutionary, more of the same that has failed us to date, a status quo that maintains globalist and 5G perpetrator agenda despite mass public protests. I have participated with grassroots in Poland to stop pro-5G legislation. Such efforts are futile, e.g. deputies and senators admit privately to reporters they know of the threats to health but would vote for 5G laws anyway. And they did; Poland has 100 times worse safety limits for radio wave irradiation than under Communism!

Others around the world erxperience similar obstacles. Given that, an energetic change of strategy is in order, away from reliance on mass public appeals, letters from scientists and emphasis on the health and life effects, while the perpetrator cabal remains fuzzily defined at best, and the grassroots skip weaponization of radio waves and mass control issues for fear of public disapproval and media ridicule.

Critic Claire Edwards’ discoveries

Following her gradual discoveries in the 4th quarter of 2019, Claire Edwards’ public exposure of the globalist connection began with a post on a marginal blog. Some graphics from Claire’s alert is clearer when you first read the above text. The subject is a bit complex, so if you need to, you will find more in material further on.

laszlo

christi

institute

global

Genocidal globalist agenda

Good two weeks before 25.1.2020 global day of 5G protest, Claire alerted: Stop 5G International hijacked. Under legal threats and also stigmatised by vain efforts to clarify with Stop 5G International and related people, she writes cryptically:

Arthur Firstenberg has chosen to associate the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space with a dubious self-appointed group, stop5ginternational, which was infiltrated by someone closely associated with various people at the very top of the Club of Rome/Agenda 21/2030/”sustainable development” movement, which believes in top-down control of people and resources, and depopulation. This is contrary to the aims of the stop 5G movement. This woman is central to a worldwide movement whose objectives may not be in alignment with those seeking to stop 5G and her participation in the stop 5G movement may be motivated by a desire to attract people to her own cause.

On 19.1.2020, Claire divulges the mysterious person at Stop 5G International — WorldShift’s leader Nicolya Christi. The movement carried out socio-engineering tasks of the Club of Budapest. Club of Madrid is its political (politruk) counterpart, and both stem from the Club of Rome. Stop 5G International was established by people connected to WorldShift.

Nicolya Christi infiltrated the stop 5G movement starting in June 2019. […] Her stated intention was […] to collectivise and lead the stop 5G movement via a “round table”.  She is the coordinator of the Worldshift movement, which was started by Ervin Laszlo, himself the leader of Club of Rome in Hungary and initiator of the Club of Budapest by agreement with Aurelio Peccei, founder of the Club of Rome. The Club of Budapest is the social engineering arm of Club of Rome.  “The WorldShift Network was designated as being responsible for the international projects of the Club of Budapest as well as for the coordination of the National Clubs.” 

Claire explains WorldShift agenda in recent email exchange with Stop 5G International and national activists. She assembles anti-human statements by so-called environmentalists, who support Greta’s psy-op and fraudulent climate change narrative:

  • Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.”  – John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal
  • Humans on the Earth behave in some ways like a pathogenic micro-organism, or like the cells of a tumor.” – Sir James Lovelock, Healing Gaia
  • The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.” – Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
  • A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to  the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.” – ProfPaul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb [he was the main promoter of the eugenics agenda of the Club of Rome]
  • I don’t claim to have any special interest in natural history, but as a boy I was made aware of the annual fluctuations in the number of game animals and the need to adjust the cull to the size of the surplus population.” – Prince Philip, preface of Down to Earth
  • A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.” – United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment
  • A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” – Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor
  • “… the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion.” – Club of Rome, Goals for Mankind
  • One America burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes. This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population,we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.” – Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier
  • If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” – Prince Philip, Duke of  Edinburgh, patron of the World Wildlife Fund
  • I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems.” – John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal
  • The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing.” – Christopher Manes, Earth First!
  • The extinction of Homo Sapiens would mean survival  for millions, if not billions, of Earth-dwelling species. Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on Earth – social and environmental.” – Ingrid Newkirk, former President of PETA
  • Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” – David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club
  • Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition.” – Peter Singer, founder of Animal Rights

Claire reproduces WorldShift 20 Declaration:

  • “It is the responsibility of the people to choose leadership that is knowledgeable and wise
  • We base ourselves on the Club of Rome Limits to Growth in 1972
  • “We need to replace the obsolete notions of nation-states
  • We need a “whole-system shift
  • “The human community needs comprehensive structural reform
  • “We need to leave everything we know behind in order to get to where we need to go.”
  • A systemic thorough reinvention of every aspect of humanity
  • “We are at a point in time when the spiritual dimension must become paramount in issues of decision making.”
  • “All states should establish an office for the specific fulfillment of the Millennium Development Goals” [later morphed into Agenda 21/2030]
  • Capital must be protected as other property rights”
  • A new bottom line must be established which incorporates the well-being of the environment and of people as part of the social bargain of society as a limited liability entity.”
  • “We must implement a proper valuation of the natural world independent of human interests”
  • “National sovereignty must be balanced with universal norms and values.”
  • “The human future and financial markets must be sustainable”
  • We need a “Global Environment Economy”
  • “We must … partner one another through the greatest social transformation ever known.”

In short, complete revolution and destruction of existing order: the family, society, humanity, and national states and sovereignty.

“Attorney” Reza Ganjavi gate-keeper

Reza Ganjavi self-declares a very non-litigious approach. He goes out of his way to avoid litigation and find peaceful solutions… He has assisted many friends with legal related topics, and they achieved excellent results. His experience includes family history in law and numerous personal litigation cases. Reza stresses that he is not a certified attorney.

Despite the credentials, Reza proved to be a dictator on FB, delusional about other people’s “delusions” which he fabricates on the go with verbal abuse. He shoots “legal” threats from the hip. He emailed me on behalf of an unnamed  friend shortly after publication of Claire’s findings on my blog. He insisted on a phone or skype conversation. I preferred written exchange, as he mentioned legal nature of his intervention. His attempt ended up in an unproductive, abusive  tantrum.

Then I found that also with other people Reza tends to explode in a harassing, abusive, vulgar and insulting way when he does not get what he wants. Reza reacted so to a text by Bruce Cane quoted on my blog. In his text Bruce elaborates his grievance against Reza, the new admin of FB Stop5G Group, after previous admin(s) and moderators have been summarily purged on 27.9.2019, allegedly for reasons of Bruce’s libellous behaviour regarding Reza. I have requested from Reza copies of the alleged postings. Reza has not provided them to date.

Beside abusive pressure on Bruce, Reza also displayed his bullying tactics with legal threats.  It looks like he tried to create a power imbalance, a situation absolving him from duty to provide evidence to substantiate his charges about Bruce’s alleged libels. Reza displayed similar tactics when faced with my refusal to delete what he deems an unlawful publication. Reza should know that his actisim pro publico bono exposes him to scrutiny and criticism.

Tanja Rebel — who she is not

Tanja has a useful ignorant’s history in XR  (that she prefers not to recollect and renounce), and confirms in e-discussions her ideological confusion: sick, polit-correct elements of neomarxism,  climate change idiocy, Zionist Holocaust belying, and mindless sensing of “antisemitism”.

In her discussions with agents of critique, Tanja Katarina Rebel, the disposer of stolen Appeal, signs her emails with litanies of who she is not.  It’s a reavealing information. Collated from her emails to date, Tanja self-declares in her defence:

Roots and operations of deceptive globalist agenda

The fake “climate change” agenda is obvious:

Among the first signs that fake climate change and Stop5G were conflated into one campaign was this Swiss poster, marvelled over by Claire:

The climate change hysteria flows from media-distorted and -overblown, dodgy IPCC science. In the hyped-up abhorrent and repugnant craze that sucks some young people into suicide and many more into clinical depression, Greta Thunberg leads inter-generational warfare to divide and conquer masses for globalist agenda that is hidden from view. XR is a street implementer of this mental garbage; respectable mothers of families fall into the trap. So do many government officials, while their colleague members of secret societies know well what is at stake.

Supplemented with system knowledge by Shai Danon, an Israeli publicist for a better world, Claire lays out her understanding of the recent history and goals of the globalist agenda of depopulation and cyborgization. Independently, but with threads common with Claire’s, Mark Windows explains the forces underlying a capture of anti-5G movements and the connection with the Fake Green Agenda, UN and Citizen Assemblies. The latter one fools people into submission to undemocratic governance and manipulative delphi “public” meetings that steer away from public benefit. Interviews with XR protesters reveal a cognitive dissonance  as to issue formulation and vested global interests.

Hosted by Danish investigative reporter Lucas Alexander for Age Of Truth TV, Norwegian scientist and researcher of climate politics and history, Dr. Jacob Nordangård tells that Rockefellers and other elitist families are behind the orchestration of the “Climate agenda” (he calls it “depopulation plan”). The topics discussed indicate the depth of Nordangård’s research (see his books):

UN Agendas 21/2030; climate change denial; environmentalism; secret societies and think tanks: Club of Rome, Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, CFR, Federal Reserve and Population Council 1952; Rockefeller dynasty, Illuminati bloodline families and NWO elitist power structure; Greta Thunberg, Aldous Huxley and Brave New World; gender and transgender agenda, New Age movement; Sweden, feminism, microchipping; veganism; occult rituals; 5G, SmartMeters, SmartCities, EM frequerncies and radiation; HAARP, DEW, chemtrails, mind control…

From my own research for Prof. Christian Scherrer’s International Comparative Genocide Research Project, the NWO idea, plan and multi-faceted implementation began with the Rothschilds in 18th century. I conclude:

Numerous power groups are responsible for millions of fatalities in 20th century wars and genocides, but NWO-apocalyptic-messianic Judeocentrics seem to lead them all. Extreme Jews and Jewish bankers have instigated, supported and executed wars and revolutions. Judeocentrics had traded off a few hundred thousands new settlers in Israel for tens of millions dead in 20th century wars, incl. Jewish masses opposed to Zionism. Human life means nothing to them, in accord with Talmudic hatred and fanaticism. Shabbataian Frankists and Dönmeh, and Zionists are still at play in world’s power centres. They are the Judeocentric Power Complex (JPC), a global web of extreme Judeocentrics and Gentile supporters, not just the Zionists, all guided by “end time” ideology.

[…] JPC elite’s beliefs in total evil and destruction of Gentiles for redemption of Jews, have been driving Judeocentrics at the helm of global politics since the 17th century. The process manipulates global Jewry, including Orthodox Jews who oppose Zionism and NWO as contrary to Torah. Judeocentric policies follow Zionist, Bolshevik, Nazi and Communist traditions, coated in new phrases and rhetoric. JPC rhetoric, history, and recent developments point to advancement of the NWO ploy…

I must have hit some truth, as the paper togethter with dozens of others from leading independent genocide researchers (which I’m not one formally) have been destroyed on Prof. Scherrer’s computer shortly before publication in Volume 1, reserved for the most significant cointributions on this ambitious project covering 20th and 21st century genocide. Inf an update I would include the “technological” genocide I’ve learned since then: abortions, nuclear pollution, GMO, Rockefeller “medicine”, Big Pharma poisoning, chemtrails, vaccinations,  wireless…

For example Rising Up! and Extinction Rebellion

An out-of-date website of Rising Up! (RU) directs to Extinction Rebellion (XR) and posts forms to pledge and join them. RU consists of former activists of Compassionate Revolution Ltd. (birthed in the Occupy movement), Earth First! Occupy, Plan Stupid, Radical Think Tank and Reclaim the Power, offering a space that can be used for actions needing collective intent. In the  UK anti-fracking protests, the Reclaim the Power instigators did not end up in courts, but the grassroots activists did, so the “Ltd.” predecessor is intriguing:

Technically Compassionate Revolution Limited is a company limited by shares; we have no intention of profiting from this venture. As “Directors” we gift our time to the “company” and we will run the “company” along gift economy lines. If we need financial support for some element of the work, for example some technology changes, we may ask members to gift donations. We have incorporated because company Directors have limited liabilities- often with devastating consequences. We believe changes to the law are vital to hold company directors responsible for the activities of their companies.

Roger Hallam, a brain behind Reclaim the Power, RU and XR explains how he saves his own skin: recruit grassroot activists who want to go to jail for the cause. RU website confirmspeople may be willing to undertake acts of defiance, some of which could be illegal […] and they may wish to share their actions with others. Our site and processes are designed to support such sharing that is done by giving individual groups the decision power, but upon advice / feedback and continual review by a strategy group who sets the date and type of mass actions,  and the broad frame and demands of these events — a scheme like the “actions” Stop 5G Int’l appointed itself to organise globally.

Hallam reveals in a summary of a “climate emergency” campaign that he would be very interested in extremely valuable key activists joining the team or starting escalations in your own locality […] contact me or other people involved in such actions to get meet face to face and discuss the nitty gritty of what is planned. 

As team leader RU website features Gail Bradbrook, a doctor of biology, an economic justice campaigner and compassionate revolutionary. According to a public document “Principles and Values” (March 2018) she was RU co-founder: The initial members of the Holding Group were decided by the former strategy group (Roger Hallam, Simon Bramwell and Gail Bradbrook) at the RU gathering in Stroud, March 2017, as Stu Basden, Gail Bradbrook, Simon Bramwell and Jay. She names XR: it’s the biggest thing we have attempted. People are hosting talks in the areas where they live and we’re asking them if they are willing to take part in processes that will lead to arrest and very short periods of time in jail.

Among key resources for nonviolent activists, Bradbrook and “Principles and Values” recommend Blueprint for Revolution by Srdja Popovic, a super-activist produced by CIA and US State Department for carrying out “non-violent revolution around the world”, from Otpor! that toppled down Slobodan Milosevic (later murdered in his cell during trial in the Hague), through colour revolutions, Arab Spring, Euromaidan and “refugee” flooding of Europe, to “anti-government” protests in Iran today. The manual for these operations was developed by U. of Massachusetts professor Gene Sharp, the founder of Albert Einstein Institute, which trained provocateurs to launch popular resistance campaigns around the world, aimed at replacing governments opposed to the dictates of Western elites.

Hallamwe all stand on the shoulders of the giants who went before us – namely Gandhi and Martin Luther Kings and the many practitioners of nonviolent struggle from around the world. Our contribution has been to systematise the approach for our western highly digitalised context.

How it all fits together

From her experience as White anglophone in Quebec under terror by the separatist, Marxist-Leninist  and paramilitary Front de libération du Québec (FLQ), augmented by the events of “solidarity with natives” protests, Canadian grassroots analyst AmazingPolly lays out the structure of revolutinoary cell network under oligarchs’ management:

marxist revolution
Polly interprets the graph starting at minute 42:00, as follows:
  • Overarching cover is Civil Society, in the triad with State and Market
  • Overarching ideology is Marxism
  • Hierarchical Core = worldwide network of super-oligarchs
  • Operative Cells = movements and groups e.g. antifa, and protesters for native, Black power, environmental etc.causes who farm out to anarchists  and other Leaderless Cells and Individual Operatives outside of the Functional Core
  • Peripheral Assistance to Operative Cells and Individual Operatives

The graph used by Polly is a subset of a larger picture of global Bankster structure of power and control. From fragmentary info I imagine it looks like this, in hierarchical order of levels, more or less:

  • The highest level (Banksters) contain Decision and Steering Functions: ideology, strategy, intelligence, technology, analysis…
  • Executive Group for global mass manipulation of conscience by ideology, religion (Bnai Brith, Chabad Lubavitch, Zionists…)
  • Special Ops — Kosher Nostra, intelligence services and special forces of selected “states” (USA, UK, Israel, Saudi Arabia….)
  • Financial/Economic Ops — global/regional banks, centtral banks, investment banks, subordinate corporations
  • Implementation Group for world-wide government bodies (UN, IAEA, NATO, WHO…), national governments (via Bilderbergers, CFR, Trilateral Commission…), top hierarchies of religions, State of Israel, Illuminati
  • Media Management (MSM and “alternative”, movies, pop culture, current spin, re-writing history)
  • NGO Management

In the graph that Polly uses, the Hierarchical Core would be subordinated to NGO Management from Banksterscheme, while Peripheral Assistance would flow from its lower levels.

  • Civil Society is Soros-controlled NGOs.
  • State is run by corrupted partiocracy/democracy.
  • Market is Corporations and their law system inserted into law-giving of State and International Institutions.
  • Peripheral Assistance are various official institutions, foundations, institutes, think tanks, government departments, intelligence services and their operatives like Antifa…
  • Super oligarchs in Hierarchical Core are lower-level bankster (Soros…) and other “movers and shakers”.

Epilogue

Stuart Basden co-founded XR. In RisingUp! he was Holding Group member. He was also in the XR Guardianship Team —  sort of neo-Comintern politruks. Creep Basden’s reversely racist, hateful (racially, geo-ethnically), historically belied and “gender”-wise messed up neo-marxist credo:
[…] constructed delusions that have been coded into societies and institutions around the world: 
    • The delusion of white-supremacy centres whiteness and the experience of white people, constructing and perpetuating the myth that white people and their lives are somehow inherently better and more valuable than people of colour. 
    • The delusion of patriarchy centres the male experience, and excludes/hinders female assigned people from public life (reducing them to a possession or object for ownership or consumption). Patriarchy teaches dominating and competitive behaviours, and emphasises the idea that the world is a place of scarcity, separation and powerlessness. 
    • The delusions of Eurocentrism include the notion that Europeans know what is best for the world. 
    • The delusions of hetero-sexism/heteronormativity propagate the idea that heterosexuality is ‘normal’ and that other expressions of sexuality are deviant. 
    • The delusions of class hierarchy uphold the theory that the rich elite are better/smarter/nobler than the rest of us, and make therefore better decisions. 
Most anybody could take Basden’s gibberish apart. I will not waste time here. The point is that people of this sort mobilize millions to actions on behalf of the globalists… and masses trust them! — like in the French and Bolshevik revolutions, in major wars, e.g. Spanish war and Stalin’s wars for psychopath’s domination.
Most cynical in all of this: basdens, firstenbergs, rebels, chrisitis, ganjavis, kheels… are deluded that perpetrators (“class hierarchy“) of 5G somehow don’t deceive Humanity on climate change and the globalist agenda they unwittingly support. Two characteristics strike the observer in the personalities reviewed here: ideological confusion and quest for social control. Will the grassroots fall prey of such useful idiot “revolutionaries” who believe they help liberate Humanity from the chains of the bankster NWO cabal?

See also

By piotrbein

https://piotrbein.net/about-me-o-mnie/

13 comments

Comments are closed.