PB: The discussants miss a fundamental fact: there is no SARS CoV-2, neither isolated nor genomically sequenced, and unique covid cases probably occured after inoculation of some people via test swabs containing mRNA and/or spike protein particles:
- Science: Delivery of vax (also against “covid”) ingredients and bio-sensors by nano-tech to cells in the body + Fibers in masks and test swabs
- VIRAL Analysis of covid swab test fibres – genocide confirmation
- [Nov 2020] THEY CAN VACCINATE US THROUGH NASAL TEST SWABS AND TARGET THE BRAIN
[UGETube] How to save the world, in three easy steps
[Finnish website] https://rapsodia.fi/mrna-rokotteen-keksijan-varoitus-piikkiproteiinista-2/
[audio, Apple Podcasts] How to save the world, in three easy steps
[discussion, FreeRepublic] How to save the world, in three easy steps. DarkHorse Podcast
Posted on 2021-06-13, 7:19:37 AM by Cathi
Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology.
Mr. Steve Kirsch is a serial entrepreneur who has been researching adverse reactions to COVID vaccines.
Dr. Bret Weinstein is an evolutionary biologist. Bret talks to Robert and Steve about the pandemic, treatment and the COVID vaccines.
Steve’s paper on COVID vaccine reactions:
1 posted on 2021-06-13, 7:19:37 AM by Cathi
To: Cathi I’m surprised that hasn’t been zapped from YouTube for mentioning Ivermectin.
2 posted on 2021-06-13, 7:22:19 AM by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
To: Cathi That is a terrible title for this, especially when it really is a very worthwhile watch, even though I have only watched the first 30 minutes of it.
3 posted on 2021-06-13, 9:02:07 AM by Robert DeLong
To: Robert DeLong Well, I finally got to the end. Yes, I imagine Weinstein regrets the title, too…:-) Especially since the summary was more along the lines of we will be stuck with this forever according to the mRNA inventor. The part that was most interesting is in the last half wherein the scientist outlines the “signals” from the bio-distribution study coupled with the VAERS data that he and his FDA buddies are most concerned about. The heavy concentration of lipid nanoparticles in the bone marrow both explains the adverse effects they are seeing (thrombocytopenia) and portends future concerns about hematologic (cancer) diseases.
And they are also concerned about reproductive concerns based on concentrations in the ovaries. Big emphasis on the inadequacy of the public health agencies and the pressure and censorship that is making telling the truth impossible for anyone in the system. Overall, depressing though the scientist did report they are not yet seeing any indication of “antibody-dependent enhancement.”
4 posted on 2021-06-13, 2:24:17 PM by Cathi
To: Cathi I will have to set aside time to watch the whole thing I guess. Thanks for the update. 8>)
5 posted on 2021-06-13, 3:09:12 PM by Robert DeLong
To: Cathi Mandatory viewing, though I almost stopped in the middle because of Steve Kirsch’s rudeness to Dr. Robert Malone. Kirsch eventually tones it down, and all ends well.
Had I seen this four months ago, I might not have gotten vaccinated.
6 posted on 2021-06-13, 5:36:41 PM by TChad
To: TChad Yes, his behavior was hard to watch and once Weinstein’s patience had run out he gave Kirsch a yellow penalty card…:-)
But, I would have paid a lot of money to have access to Malone’s expertise, connections to the FDA and his very honest take on the vaccine, the actual science and the current adverse effects of the vaccine. Frightening, but very useful.
And we got it for free…:-)
7 posted on 2021-06-13, 6:13:19 PM by Cathi
To: Cathi thank-you for the post
it will take a while to view the entire podcast but from what I have seen thus far it will be worth it
8 posted on 2021-06-14, 10:14:52 AM by khelus
To: Cathi As an AML leukemia patient, 2:19 really stood out as something new – as they discussed how the marrow is effected. I’m so grateful I didn’t get it.
9 posted on 2021-06-16, 12:21:06 AM by HollyB
To: Cathi Considering Dr Malone and Steve both were vaxed is telling also.
10 posted on 2021-06-16, 12:23:09 AM by HollyB
To: Cathi I’m just reading your post. I noted the same at #9.