BC Provincial Court hearing — Exhibits

Source: https://piotrbein.net/2021/09/16/bc-provincial-court-hearing—-exhibits/

Disputant: Piotr Bein

Hearing in room 308 on February 1, 2022, 10 am Plaintiff did not appear in the Court, the Judge dismissed the case

….

Hearing in room 308 on September 17, 2021, 2:30 pm POST-PONED, the Plaintiff brought too many witnesses, the Presiding Judge needs more time alloted to the trial

Surrey Provincial Court, 14340 57th Ave. Surrey BC

Violation Ticket 3585:AJ14542337-1

Police File No: 726:AJ14542337

Table of contents

Exhibit 1: Unlawful emergency

Exhibit 2: EPA/M012, BC CDC and RCMP guidance

Exhibit 3: Singled out, targeted and entrapped. Thrifty store ban

Exhibit 4: RCMP officers’ malfeasance

Exhibit 5: Threat, assault, torture, extorsion

Exhibit 6: Requesting witnesses and RCMP case information

Exhibit 1: Unlawful emergency

Ministerial orders regarding the “covid-19 pandemic” are unlawful, as their science basis is fraudulent. There has been no emergency whatsoever, according to science and data.

The “pandemic” is an unprecedented genocidal fraud. The peddlers, abettors and executors of the mass psychosis should stand before the Court, not this mask-exempt ailing senior who has done nothing wrong and defends Canada’s law and order, having done his homework as a scientist, researcher and investigative reporter.

The RCMP Offcers and the store Manager displayed ignorance of law, science and fact. They jointly targeted and entrapped me, then the Officers threatened me, assaulted, tortured and extorted to using an iffy medical device. They violated Canadian Constitution, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Criminal Code, the Nuremberg Code, RCMP enforcement guideline, and the BC pandemic order itself. If only the RCMP and the Manager defended us from adultered foods!

I was born just after World War II from Polish survivors of the Nazi Holocaust and joint Nazi – Soviet extermination of Poles. I grew up under the communist regime. English is my second language; will the Court please excuse my language difficulties.

Highlights of science and fact:

  • SARS CoV-2 has never been isolated from a sick person with “covid-19” symptoms, nor sequenced genomically anywhere in the world, incl. BC.
  • All diagnostic testing is invalid as it requires knowledge of SARS CoV-2 genomic sequence.
  • A mass psychosis of fear is driven by relentless announcing the “cases” based on the fraudulent testing and deaths “with covid”, not “of covid”.
  • From the beginning, the ultimate goal is mass “vaccination” with a self-spreading bio-weapon rolled out unapproved, untested, unsafe and ineffective in preventing infections, and known from science to cause massive serious illness, death and sterilisation.
  • There is no scientific evidence for the need nor the effectiveness of mask-wearing, but ample scientific proofs exist for the physical and psychologic harm.

I encapsulated the science and facts as follows:

  1. Notes dated April 6, 2021 https://piotrbein.net/2021/04/06/draft-disputing-rcmp-ticket-for-mask-exemption/
  2. Basic material, compiled to warn the public: https://piotrbein.net/2021/07/28/updates-collection-concise-genocidal-covid-plandemic/
  3. Statement of claim by Action4Canada and the Constitutional Rights Centre. Expert evidence on PCR test fallacy alone is thousands pages long. https://piotrbein.net/2021/08/28/canada-british-columbia-top-attorney-files-covid-case-against-provincial-and-federal-officials/
  4. Questions re. BC government plandemic policy, by silenced BC health professionals. Current BC Public Health Officer’s testimomy in 2015 re. mask ineffectiveness is included. https://piotrbein.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Open-Letter-to-BH-AD-JH.pdf
  5. As an example of numerous professional statements, a short exposé by a Canadian medical authority, Dr. Roger Hodkinson: Unprecedented horror show, the worst in medical history… pack of lies, pure propaganda… Pandemic of fear… intentionally driven. https://piotrbein.net/2021/08/22/dr-roger-hodkinson-unprecedented-horror-show-the-worst-in-medical-history-totally-unnecessary-grotesque-human-tragedy-its-all-been-a-pack-of-lies-pure-propaganda-pandemic-of-fear/

Exhibit 2: EPA/M012, BC CDC and RCMP guidance

2A. Emergency Program Act, Ministerial Order M012 by the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/mo/mo/m0012_2021

AND WHEREAS it is not possible for some persons to wear face coverings and I have taken that into consideration in this order; […] Exemption from use of face covering
Section 3 [Face coverings required in indoor public spaces] does not apply as follows: […] (b)  to a person who is unable to wear a face covering because of (i) a psychological, behavioural or health condition, or (ii) a physical, cognitive or mental impairment;

I am exempt for 3 physical and 6 psychological/mental reasons: https://piotrbein.net/2021/04/06/draft-disputing-rcmp-ticket-for-mask-exemption/

2B. BC CDC guidance for retail stores interprets the PHO order http://www.bccdc.ca/health-info/diseases-conditions/covid-19/employers-businesses/retail-stores Source accessed at 20:09 on 27.3.2021. Fear-mongering in italics.:

What to do when customers refuse to wear masks

When customers refuse to wear masks in your store it puts workers and other customers at risk.

[…] Employers have a duty to accommodate customers and workers who may not be able to wear masks for disability or other medical reasons.  If a worker or customer shares these as reasons why they cannot wear a mask you should accommodate per the information provided by the BC Human Rights TribunalPoster: Exemptions to mandatory mask orders 

2C. RCMP (Operational Readiness and Response E Division) internal guidance https://piotrbein.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Scan-211070001.pdf

Face shields alone are not considered to be face coverings.

Note: Some mandatory face covering exemptions are broadly defined. Compliance and Enforcement officers are recommended to approach these situations with caution and compassion.

Exhibit 3: Singled out, targeted and entrapped. Thrifty store ban

I may have been sigled out, targeted and entrapped. Following 10.2.2021 incident over face cover, RCMP informed me that stores are video-surveilled and BC PHO’s press announcements confirmed it for Surrey.

In January 2021 one of my two blogs was suspended under circumstances unseen over 12 years at my service provider who always pointed to a suspension reason and advised on repair of terms of service violation. https://piotrbein.net/2021/03/01/killed-by-plandemic-psychos-my-blog-kicks-ass-anew/

This time my blog was closed without any reason, after it published critique and open letters to BC PHO Bonnie Henry, further to her invitation to submit comments, should factual information differ from hers. She never responded to my open letters.

Following a 10.2.2021 incident at Everything Wine, RCMP gave me strange care. It started with unlawful knocking on my door that frightened my wife. Then Cst. Bell kindly arranged an educational meeting with the chief acute covid floor nurse at Surrey Memorial Hospital. https://piotrbein.net/2021/03/31/archive-mask-exemption-saga-feb-2021/

As the nurse failed to undermine my factual base (she gets hers from “guidelines” coming from above, she said), a Polish-speaking RCMP Officer (last name starting with L) phoned me. In pursuing fraudulent plandemic orders, RCMP profiled me ethnically and tried to reform me re. alleged sourcing of information from the internet, like some thought police. Medical staff and RCMP get genocidal “guidelines” from the internet, but contrary info from it should be off limits for this researcher?

Overhearing yet another patronising nonsense from RCMP, my wife told him off, extremely angered by his ignorant, condescending nerve.

The Thrifty store Manager also became befogged by the plandemic mass psychosis. He served me Notice of Prohibition of Entry https://piotrbein.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Scanned-Document-1.pdf at 17:45 pm, i.e. 6 minutes before the RCMP ticket issue. https://piotrbein.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/mask-ticket.pdf

I noted shortly after: https://piotrbein.net/2021/04/06/draft-disputing-rcmp-ticket-for-mask-exemption/

At the start of my Easter shopping at Thrifty’s, I talked amiably with the store manager. I answered him on face covering — I am exempt from mask-wearing. He wished to know why. Even though it’s none of his business, I answered politely: for physical and mental reasons. He neither told me to leave nor warned of any aftermath. He consented tacitly to my shopping by not objecting to it, nor asking me to leave on whatever grounds. It was an entrappment and the Court may want to examine RCMP 911 call records.

Thrifty’s Manager claimed lack of mask put his customers and staff at risk. So why didn’t he request I leave immediately at the beginning of my shopping? It’s an evidence of entrapment, without regard for the safety of staff and customers. Asked to show store license obligating to serve customers, he refused.

Exhibit 4: RCMP officers’ malfeasance

At the checkout, three RCMP officers were waiting for me. They didn’t identify themselves, but demanded proof of. my mask exemption. I said I don’t need to show any, and tried anyway to obtain one on Cst. Bell’s advice in February, and was rejected by the walk-in clinic automatic registration. Cst. Bell didn’t answer my email for help with that.

At Thrifty’s, the White Female Officer interrupted more or less so: “The doctor rejected you so you are not exempt!” I clarified it was the clinic’s machine. To my request for her ID, she wrote something down on one of my grocery packages, but it was confiscated with my groceries eventually. I was left without any note of the RCMP officers’ identity

Against the Nuremberg Code (mask is a medical device), they insisted I put a mask on “just to get through”. Cst. Yung said I must wear a mask like he does, for safety, and the White Female Officer pointed to her “bandana”. I cited science that masks are ineffective and harmful. The Officers’ own face covers and push to put a mask on triggered psychologic/mental associations of points 2.1 to 2.6: https://piotrbein.net/2021/04/06/draft-disputing-rcmp-ticket-for-mask-exemption/

I named Nuremberg Trials for following criminal orders as the RCMP does. Cst. Yung avenged this; he abruptly yanked the shopping cart out of my hand. Ignorant of law, truth and science, the Officers disrespect an informed old man and yank out a cart, his suspport, without regard for the risk of falling!

The Officers escorted me to the store ENTRY, against covid safety rules! They deprived me of Easter groceries I selected for disabled spouse, who can’t go shopping. The Officers rudely and hastily pressed me out of the store, while violating social distance and breathing out their mask-bred bacteria on my neck. I stopped and asked not to do it, as I can’t walk briskly but the Officers didn’t care.

My family saw me return depressed, shocked and angry. I couldn’t sleep well for several weeks after, got arhytmic heart beat, became apathetic, depressed, anxious, feeling helpless and irritable. I recollected earlier traumatic mask exemption incidents, involving hostile panic reactions of masked people since March 2020. 

Since the incident, I wake up in nightmares, a rare occurence in previous years. Only the present Freedom Convoy, a light at the end of the tyrranic plandemic tunnel, gives me new energy and hope my resistance was not in vain.

Exhibit 5: Alleged tresspass of Thrifty’s manager and the RCMP Officers: coercion, assault, torture, extorsion

I found the Manager’s and the Officers’ behaviour disproportional and unlawful for a mask-exempt disabled elderly. Canada is a signatory to the Nuremberg Code. It requires voluntary informed consent to medical procedure such as mask-wearing, without any form of coercion. Nuremberg Code: Article 6, Section 1:

Any preventative, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be expressed and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.

Nuremberg Code: Article 6: Section 3:

In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.

By coercing me to mask-wearing, the Officers and the Manager breached the Nuremberg Code. Misled by “collective community agreement” on the plandemic and mask-wearing, they punished me, with disadvantage and prejudice, causing anxiety, angst, public humiliation and a feeling of being terrorised.

I view the plandemic from the point of my family and nation’s suffering under Nazi, Soviet and communist tyrranies. The Officers and the Manager participated in the plandemic mass crime execution of mass psychosis and medical tyrrany by corrupt, criminal government serving the globalists, who eye genocide and enslavement in New World Order.

The Officers threatened that if I don’t present my ID, they would arrest me and take to a police station. They contravened the Criminal Code of Canada (CCC):

264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat (a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person;

It may be an assault according to CCC section 265, as the Officers carried unknown objects around their belts, while exercising authority by reason of fraud (unlawful public health emergency)

265 (1) A person commits an assault when (c) while openly wearing or carrying a weapon or an imitation thereof, he accosts or impedes another person or begs. (3) For the purposes of this section, no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does not resist by reason of (b) threats or fear of the application of force to the complainant; (c) fraud; or (d) the exercise of authority.

By CCC 269 I have reasons to believe I was tortured:

269.1 (1) Every official, or every person acting at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of an official, who inflicts torture on any other person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

torture means any act or omission by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person (a) for a purpose including (ii) punishing the person for an act that the person […] has committed or is suspected of having committed, and (iii) intimidating or coercing the person […], or (b) for any reason based on discrimination of any kind,

(3) It is no defence to a charge under this section that the accused was ordered by a superior or a public authority to perform the act or omission that forms the subject-matter of the charge or that the act or omission is alleged to have been justified by exceptional circumstances, including […] public emergency.

The Officers were unjustified to make me comply with unlawful order that exempts from mask-wearing anyway. In their extortion to prompt mask-wearing, they had no escuse of not knowing as their duty is to enforce law and order based on truth. They have the capacity to discern truth from fraud and good from evil, being required to possess higher education and a basic knowledge of law.

346 (1) Every one commits extortion who, without reasonable justification or excuse and with intent to obtain anything, by threats, accusations, menaces or violence induces or attempts to induce any person, […] to whom violence is shown, to do anything or cause anything to be done.

Exhibit 6: Requesting witnesses and RCMP case information

Witness1: Mr. Ryan Bancroft https://piotrbein.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/witness1.pdf

Some days after emailing him on 16.8.2921, I went to see Mr. Bancroft at his store. He said he did not receive my email but assured me he would be present as a witness for the Court hearing, called by the RCMP side. At the 17.8.2021 hearing, he wasn’t there.

Upon receipt of the new hearing notice, I renewed my request and sent it to the email address he gave me in August.

Witness2: RCMP officers and request for case information https://piotrbein.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/witness2.pdf

30.8.2021 before  noon I drove to Copy Shop to print out the emails, then to the nearest office in White Rock to re-file the paper copy. With others in the line, I waited ca. 15 minutes. The door opened 1 pm. Inside the library building, on the RCMP office door I found a sign: closed due to the pandemic. RCMP cuts on service and enforces unlawful ministerial orders instead of arresting and investigating the psychos behind fake pandemic!

The sign directed to RCMP, 14355 57th Avenue in Surrey. I drove there, only to be  told by the receptionist to leave for lack of mask. They did not bother to understand my request. To no effect I protested. As in the March 27, RCMP intervention, it was a violation of the provincial health order exemptions and of my right to essential service —  apartheid based on fraudulent pandemic regulations. 

An officer came out with like attitude, treating me like a goofy intruder. He could not even peruse the court hearing notice I showed him. It took explaining to be heard. He came back with Detachment 2 address 10395 148 St. I drove 40 minutes in busy traffic, arriving at ca.3 pm. Very sustainable for the gov’t declarations on saving the environment.

The receptionist promptly gave me Young’s new e-address. On way home  I stopped to eat, but a few resturants showed me the door for mask exemption.

At home, I forwarded the Witness2 email to officer [email protected] He responded reluctantly, delaying for months, when I gave up in November, 2021, realising that I can’t get from RCMP the info I need before an imminent post-poned trial date. Emails chronologically:

On Tuesday, August 31, 2021, 08:17:34 AM PDT, Yung, Milton Ching <[email protected]> wrote:Sir, I will be at the provincial court on Sept 17, 2021 along with all the witnesses. I will have a copy of my notes which you can review on that day prior to 2:30pm. Constable YUNG, 182478, Surrey RCMP, District 3, SCRU

From: Piotr Bein Sent: August 31, 2021 11:04:12 AM To: Yung, Milton Ching Subject: Re: Mask VT

Constable Yung, I need the info sufficiently in advance to study it and prepare for the hearing. The Violation Ticket Centre confirms I have the right to request it, and that failure to  comply justifies my asking the Court for post-ponement to give me time to familiarise myself with the information. Please provide the information in advance. You did not answer my question re. contact information on the other two officers that I need to call to the Court as witnesses. Regards

On Tuesday, August 31, 2021, 12:41:43 PM PDT, Yung, Milton Ching: The other officer will be there. The Asian female officer will not be there because she is on General Duty. My partner and I were seconded to the COVID enforcement team specifically to deal with Emergency Health Act.You were there on the day I gave you the ticket. My notes will say, you were asked to wear a mask by myself, my partner Cst BOYER and the store manager. The manager and Cst BOYER also suggested to you a compromise of wearing a face shield even though the face shield is not a substitute for the mask. You still refused and the manager refused to serve you, ie not ringing your products through the till. You were served a ticket by myself and escorted out of Thrifty Foods by myself and Cst BOYER. I hope that refreshes your memory. As for my report you will be able to review it in on Sept 17, 2021. Regards


After Sep 17, 2022, Court hearing

From: Piotr Bein <[email protected]>
Sent: September 20, 2021 8:24:14 AM
To: Yung, Milton Ching
Subject: Re: Mask VT Sir, 
The notes you kindly allowed me to glance just before the Court hearing today differ from your email summary. Please provide me well in advance with a copy of notes to be used by the Plaintiff in the Court, because I do not want similar surprises in the future. 
Should the Plaintiff allegations change before re-scheduled hearing, please notify me by attaching the new wording. Due to severity and complexity of the case, I do not agree anymore to glancing of the Plaintiff’s notes minutes to trial commencement. 
To prepare for the trial, I need copies of all RCMP records, 911 recordings, the intervening RCMP Officers’ body cam and store video footage, and other documents and evidence in RCMP possession concerning the subject case and any related cases under my name in RCMP files, to be brought before the Court by the Plaintiff. 
What is the proper process for obtaining copies of this material into my hands?
Regards

On Tuesday, October 5, 2021, 08:40:32 PM PDT, Yung, Milton Ching <[email protected]> wrote:

Good afternoon,

The notes I let you review says exactly the same as the email I sent you. You can disagree with it, but at the end of the day you were not wearing a mask in the store and there were ample opportunities offered to you to do so. 

The call for service you will have to contact the Surrey Disclosure unit for the call to police. 

The only thing I can give you is my written report which are my notes as I typed it up shortly after I attended this call. This is the same report you read outside the court room. Cst BOYER took a photograph of you in Thrifty’s not wearing a mask which I can also provide to you. 

If you want video footage from the store, I cannot give that to you as it does not belong to me. 

I am not attached to a traffic unit and therefore, I do not have a body cam and one is not provided to me by the RCMP.

Constable YUNG, 57877, Surrey RCMP, District 3, SCRU

From: Piotr Bein <[email protected]>
Sent: October 7, 2021 11:12:35 AM
To: Yung, Milton Ching
Subject: Re: Mask VT Good morning, Constable Yung
Thank you for your reply. I am not disputing the fact that I did not wear a”face covering”, opportunities to do so were available and offered, but I refused any to put on.
The notes you kindly let me read outside of the Court room on Sep 17, 2021, contain details absent in your emailsummary.such as:- the name of the Thrifty staff who placed the 911 call to RCMP- mention of repeated previous bans in stores for lack of masking- reference to the Thrifty’s manager serving a ban on me for lack of face cover.
These points are important, I believe, to my upcoming representations to the Presiding Judge. 
Unless there are reasons I am not aware of for releasing to me a copy of your official notes, please attach one to an email. 
Should there be problems with copying/scanning at District 3, I can pick up the copy at the reception upon a notice by email.
Regards

On Thursday, October 7, 2021, 02:53:25 PM PDT, Yung, Milton Ching <[email protected]> wrote:

Good afternoon,
As I told you the report was written/typed shortly after Cst BOYER and I attended the file so all the details were fresh in our mind. Did you see at any point either me or Cst BOYER take out our notebooks while talking to you. If we did take notes it would only contain your personal information so we can enter you as an entity for the file. Both Cst BOYER and I checked our notebooks and neither one of us have hand written or “official” notes. 
You were not banned on the previous occasions, you were banned on the date the ticket was issued. Who called police has nothing to do with the court case. Also I based my decision to issue you a violation ticket for not wearing a mak, based on the previous files and warnings you received before.
If you want a copy of Cst BELL’s report,  21-21011, where he went out of his way to arrange to a tour with a Register Nurse at the Peace Arch Hospital to help you understand what COVID is and what it does to people. I suggest you go through Freedom of Information Act to get that report.  Other related reports were you refused to wear a mask, 21-20968 and 21-27212 should you want to get those as well. 
Since you are not disputing the fact you were not wearing a face covering, which is the charge, I do not see the reason to go to trial, but it is your right to do so. All the other points you want to arguing are irrelevant, such as who called. You are already familiar with the manager and staff of Thrifty’s who have dealt with you in the past. 
I have attached a copy of the report you read on September 17, 2021 outside the court room. 
Regards,
Constable YUNG

From: Piotr Bein <[email protected]>
Sent: October 9, 2021 6:32:30 PM
To: Yung, Milton Ching
Cc: Keay, Bob; Ekelund, Brennen
Subject: Re: Mask VT Sir, 
Thank you for copying your supervisors. I am sorry you got upset, I merely used your term”notes” for the “Narrative Text Hardcopy GO# 1301 2021-44034”. You are right, it does not mention multiple bans; it indicates “4 non compliance covid files this year.” Please provide file numbers for all of them for my request under FOIPPA as well. 
The “Narrative” states that I “was very argumentative”.  I am hereby requesting  full disclosure from the Crown of anything that is relevant to my alleged behaviour — actions and what I said to this effect. 
Who called and why is also relevant as will be clear at the Court. 
Neither of the three of you has identified themselves. I remember the two female Officers as petite and dark-haired — one White, the other Asian, and all of you were masked up. I wish to confirm Cst. Boyer’s identity. To this effect I need Thrifty’s store video recordings; please indicate a process for obtaining this material. It is also indispensable to prove what happened between me and the store manager in the beginning of that shopping. 
Regards,

On Oct 14, 2021, at 7:29 AM, Yung, Milton Ching <[email protected]> wrote:

If you re-read the e-mail I sent you, you will see 4 file #’s including the one you were given the ticket for. 
I am not upset and I shared the emails with my supervisors because I do not need you to make up any misinformation’s down the road. 
The video is the property of Thrifty’s and not mine to give and I do not have that. 
If you want the names of the complainants please go through the Freedom of Information’s Act. Also it mentions who called in the report you were provide and you know who the Thrifty’s manager is already. 
Cst BOYER is my partner on that day and we were assigned to COVID Enforcement Team from March 2020 to June 2021, dealing with COVID related matters. The Asian female officer will not be in court as I told you from the first email. It is not advantages for us to lie about our identity in any matter which goes before the courts. It is also in my report that Cst BOYER was there and you can look at her name tag when she attends court on the following date you set. 
Regards, Constable YUNG

From: Piotr Bein <[email protected]>
Sent: October 14, 2021 6:42:56 PM
To: Yung, Milton Ching
Cc: Keay, Bob; Ekelund, Brennen
Subject: Re: Mask VT Sir
I do not set the Court dates, but I do care that everybody’s time would not be wasted again and everything that might be required in my defence and possible appeals is deposited in the current process. 

There are numbers for three reports in your email. What is the fourth report number?
You already wrote that the store video is not your property, but I asked what the proper procedure is for me to obtain it.
I don’t allege that you lie. I state that neither of you were wearing a name tag during the intervention and I have no other way to confirm the identities. RCMP has been vey busy and mistakes are possible. 

Regards

On Tuesday, November 9, 2021, 10:23:30 a.m. PST, Yung, Milton Ching <[email protected]> wrote:

Yes, I realized my mistake after I sent the email.

The fourth report is the one that you were given the ticket on. 

Go ask Thrifty’s for the video. 

I wrote you the ticket and my name is on that ticket. My partner Cst BOYER was wearing her external police vest and her name tag is always on her vest. 

Piotr Bein <[email protected]>To:Yung, Milton Ching

Cc:Keay, Bob,Ekelund, Brennen

Tue., Nov. 9, 2021 at 11:38 a.m.

Thank you. I note the long delay in your answer.
With 90-day response period for FOI request, the copies of reports will not arrive prior to the Court sitting. An illegible signature is on the ticket, along with a number that is not yours. For poor eyesight, I asked an officer’s name be written down for me. It was finally done on a package that minutes later was confiscated being part of my groceries.
In another RCMP intervention, I received similar treatment with non-disclosure of officer names. RCMP needs to improve performance in this area. I hope your supervisors will attend to this issue.
Regards, Piotr Bein

By piotrbein

https://piotrbein.net/about-me-o-mnie/