Excerpt from Christine Massey’s emaii, links checked and made hot. — PB
From: [email protected] To: “[email protected]” Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2021, 11:50:06 a.m. PST Subject: “germ” FOIs: no records! Emergency letter to Sudbury Police; confusion in freedom movement
Confusion in the freedom movement?
2. Against the gatekeepers. Small bad document – by Dr. Stefano Scoglio, Ph.D. (in Italian but some browsers will translate it for you)
3. Solving the Riddle of [“COVID-19 vaccine” developer] Byram Bridle – by Rosemary Frei
4. Reiner Fuellmich, video:
@8:00: “Turns out there is a virus, yes, no one is denying that, but it is no more dangerous than the common flu at .14 or .15 infection fatality rate… the way he [Drosten] set his test up, it was bound, it was guaranteed, to produce 100% false positives…”
@9:00: “So in short, the virus is no more dangerous than the common flu, the survival rate is 99.97%…“
@9:20: “The PCR test, which is the ONLY foundation for any and all measures, because it is only the PCR test with which the cases, the positive testresults, were created…. The PCR test is totally unreliable. Everyone knows that PCR test alone cannot tell us anything about infections, and the way Drosten set it up it was bound, it was guaranteed to produce false positives”
@19:00: “There are many scientists out there who are saying that this virus has never been isolated. Others are saying yes it has it has been isolated. I am not convinced, I do not think that the virus has been isolated, but I do not want to get into this fight because it doesn’t really matter. […] From what I hear, the isolation of the virus is not what I would consider isolation with a natural virus but rather is an isolation that is being done in a computer model that doesn’t convince me. […] But I don’t want to get into this fight because I think we can do without answering this question. […] If we know that the virus is no more dangerous than the flu and we also know that we don’t have a corona pandemic, but only a PCR test pandemic, let’s go after the people who put out these lies… then let’s follow the evidence from one person to the next…”
My head is spinning. So… Reiner somehow knows “there is a virus”.
And Reiner somehow doesn’t know that people around the world are disputing this. Despite talking to experts and so-called experts from around the world for the last year. Despite the 1.5 million Euro reward offered for proof of the virus, in his own country. Wow.
And Reiner somehow knows the infection fatality rate of this “virus”, despite acknowledging in the same breath that only a digital virus has been “isolated” and the PCR tests are 100% useless and meaningless.
Based on this curious line of reasoning, Reiner will only go after only the PCR tests and leave the anti-science methods of virology alone. Because fraudulent monkey-business “virus isolations” don’t really matter? And fraudulent “isolates” never shown to have anything to do with a virus don’t really matter? And fabricated “genomes” corresponding to nothing in the physical realm don’t really matter? And meaningless arrows on EM images don’t really matter? Fraudulent claims of a “virus” don’t really matter?
And where will that leave us?
With a digital virus and variants that according to Reiner have killed some people?
Needing new and improved tests for the digital virus and variants?
(Just as “multiplex tests” that distinguish between digital influenza and corona-viruses are about to be rolled out. Problem solved!)
Coercion re seasonal injections to protect against ever-mutating digital coronaviruses, on top of those for digital flu viruses? What could possibly go wrong?
I guess it doesn’t really matter? FOI responses and court documents from 141 institutions (and counting) in >25 countries: Every institution failed to cite any record re purification of the imaginary “covid-19 virus” from any patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, or proof of “its” existence.
SARS-COV-2 FOIs grouped by country, plus my signed declaration.
Growing collection of FOI responses re other imaginary viruses (HIV, HPV, Influenza, Measles, etc., etc., etc.). Because “they” don’t exist and virology isn’t a science. Do health and science institutions have studies proving that bacteria CAUSE disease? Let’s find out, via Freedom of Information.
For Truth, Freedom and Sanity,
Peterborough, ON Canada