Back in July 2021, The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced that its PCR test has failed its full review and will have its Emergency Use Authorization revoked.
The Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test, the CDC’s benchmark COVID diagnostic testing system, will be withdrawn for Emergency Use by the end of 2021 due to an inordinate frequency of false-positive and negative results.
“The FDA has identified this as a Class I recall, the most serious type of recall. Use of these devices may cause serious injuries or death,” the FDA stated on its website.
“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only” (source).
“CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives” (source).
The FDA goes on to explain the risks associated with false positives and negatives:
False-negative results may lead to delayed diagnosis or inappropriate treatment of SARS-CoV-2, which may cause patient harm including serious illness and death. False-negative results can also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including when presumed negative patients are grouped into cohorts in health care, long-term care, and other facilities based on false test results.
False-positive results could lead to a delay in the correct diagnosis and the initiation of an appropriate treatment for the actual cause of patient illness, which could be another life-threatening disease that is not SARS-CoV-2. False-positive results could also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when presumed positive patients are grouped into cohorts based on false test results (source)
Although the CDC was also a distributor of the RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel they advised that from September 30, 2021, they would no longer happen and that laboratories should transition away from the Diagnostic Panel by the end of 2021 (source). Why would the CDC wait until the end of 2021 to cease the use of the RT-PCR Test?
The Novel Coronavirus
We are now almost at the second anniversary of the commencement of the governments across the globe terrorising their own people by claiming that there was a deadly new virus due to an initial 44 “cases” of pneumonia with unknown aetiology being discovered.
However, this was a virus that was so deadly, but we had to be tested for it to see if we had it or not.
The RT PCR Debut
This began after a “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC) which was declared by the WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (source). An “emergency” situation was created despite the fact that there were a reported 170 deaths, which with a global population of over seven and three-quarters of a billion people (7,794,798,739) the number was relatively minuscule.
Not to mention the fact that 99% of the “cases” and 170 deaths which were all in China, were deemed to have been from a novel virus that had not been proven to exist, as it had not been isolated.
The Increase of Cases
A week or so before the WHO declaration of the PHEIC on January 23, 2020, a paper now referred to as the Corman Drosten paper had appeared on the WHO’s website (13th and 17th January 2020) from the scientific journal Eurosurveillance.
The authors of the published paper were Dr. Christian Drosten, and several of his colleagues from the Berlin Virology Institute, and the head of a biotech company, TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, claimed to have developed the first effective test for detecting whether someone is infected with the novel coronavirus.
Despite the fact that the authors had acknowledged that they had designed the test “without having virus material available” The RT PCR test was to enter centre stage, enabling the statistics or “cases” to align with the declaration from the WHO resulting in the total number of cases increasing to 9,826.64 by the very next day.
The RT PCR Test Flaws
However, in November 2020 the Cornan Drosten paper which had been the basis for the widespread use of the PCR test had been reviewed by a group of scientists, Pieter Borger, Rajesh Kumar Malhotra, and Michael Yeadon et al.
The group of scientists and researchers concluded that the “external peer review of the RT PCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2” reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level.”
Just as the CDC had found, these flaws were consequences for false-positive results according to the scientists (source).
Also, as reported in the Expose by a biomedical scientist, “when PCR is performed badly and/or at high cycle numbers (as has been common) the target sequence may not even be present in the sample and a “positive” result is simply an artefact of the PCR process”
The scientist argued that “The PCR cannot diagnose the infectious status of a person in any proven way and no consistent link has ever been found between a disease state and the PCR results”
“The misapplication of a completely inaccurate PCR means that COVID-19 is a scientifically meaningless construct that is nothing more than a self-referential illusion (source).
The Flaws Have Been Ignored
For more than a year scientists have alerted us to the fact that the test is meaningless, but their conclusions have not been acted upon by the government and health bodies who have continued to use the test.
Consequently, the “cases” deemed to be COVID infections have continued on a reign of terror, all due to the power of a PCR test that was seriously flawed (source).
The Government Advice
This was also aided by the UK government of course, who advised that if you had any of the 3 symptoms deemed to be COVID-19 symptoms, even if mild to get a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test as soon as possible.
The three symptoms were and still are; a high temperature, a new, continuous cough, or you’ve lost your sense of smell or taste (source). These symptoms are those many people would have had year in year out, of course, due to the common cold.
Nonetheless, the familiar symptoms of the common cold were soon discarded like a commodity victim of a capitalist society by many who now preferred to call their sniffles the “novel COVID-19”.
After all we live in a society that encourages us to bin the old faithful in return for the new improved version whether it is needed or not.
Gone was the need for man flu also, the sympathy for this new virus did not have to be begged for, not even for those people who were “asymptomatic” aka “healthy” just as long as the person was in receipt of a positive PCR result.
Roll Up, Roll Up, Come and Get Your Free PCR Test
Also appealing to our conditioning within a capitalist society, the test has been marketed as “free” as if that will entice us to have it.
Additionally, the UK government also uses terminology akin to consumerism style marketing by saying that they were “offering a service” and that a PCR test kit can even be “sent to your home, book an appointment at a walk-in or drive-through test site”.
They make it sound as frivolous and as easy as an Amazon order or purchasing our fast-food meal, activities that we now have a comfortable familiarity with.
Therefore, speaking the language of the neo-liberal consumer society that we have all become accustomed to the government “offered the service” to healthy people that did not need a test. In fact, they gave more reasons for those without symptoms to have the test, than those with symptoms.
Also, notice below how they boldly use a call to action “Get a free PCR test,” which is a well-known marketing ploy, they are not asking they are telling your subconscious to do it, which perhaps works in a similar fashion to people returning from the supermarket with tat they do not actually need.
Clearly their tactics worked
Despite how obvious it has been that the RT PCR assay is a tool used to afford the statistical basis to a pandemic in order to produce enough cases worthy of the term “pandemic” and therefore all measures that were put in place under the “emergency”.
These measures have adversely affected many and for some, they have been devastatingly life-changing, yet they would not have been accepted so readily by the population without the daily “cases” being used to frighten us all into compliance.
So, there we have it, “the government need the tool in order to frighten us into compliance”, it is meaningless in terms of a diagnostic tool, but it has worked a treat for our government enabling the enforcement of measures, vaccines, and now boosters.
While we still have people queueing up to ascertain if they had the novel coronavirus, we will always be fraudulently placed within that “Public Health Emergency of International Concern”