3rd strike for Dr. McCullough
James Henderson asked Dr. Peter McCullough if any lab in the world has purified samples, taken from humans, of the alleged virus/variants, and whether any experiment exists where healthy living beings were infected with purified “SARS-COV-2”. Dr. McCullough’s reply: “Contact Caldas and Patterson“ (with attachments).
Caldas et al. don’t claim to have isolated/purified a virus. Instead, “SARS-CoV-2 isolate (HIAE-02: SARS-CoV-2/SP02/human/2020/BRA (GenBank accession number MT126808.1) was used in this work.” SARS-CoV-2/SP02/human/2020/BRA originates from another study, SARS-CoV-2 isolation from the first reported patients in Brazil and establishment of a coordinated task network.
Quote: “We used Vero E6 cells for isolation…We cultured Vero E6….with 10% of heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum…”
I think we can safely rule out Caldas et al.
Patterson et al. also don’t claim to have isolated/purified any virus, or to have studied any virus. Quote: “we report … the presence of SARS-CoV-2 PROTEIN“ (my emphasis), which they note was “unaccompanied by corresponding viral RNA“, lol.
Dr. Saeed Qureshi forwarded my Open Letter to “virus” promoter Steve Kirsch to Principia Scientific International:
FOI responses and court documents from 164 institutions (and counting) in >25 countries: Every institution failed to cite any record re purification of the imaginary “covid-19 virus” from any patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, or proof of “its” existence.
SARS-COV-2 FOIs grouped by country
Growing collection of FOI responses re other imaginary viruses (HIV, HPV, Influenza, Measles, etc., etc., etc.). Because “they” don’t exist and virology isn’t a science.
For Truth, Freedom and Sanity,
Peterborough, ON Canada